I don't know why these idiots think they can make legislation with such far reaching implications. Well, at least we know they REALLY wanna control us.
Well... not quite political but Jobs categorically banished Abobe Flash from all iOS devices in protest over their poor standards of stability and so on, but it certainly wasn't a technical nor legal impossibility of iPhones and iPads running Flash. And people bought iPod, iPhones and iPads anyway in greater numbers than competition who did stick with flash.Space Jawa said:Your attempt at a comparison here kind of falls flat given the differences between your example and the situation we're looking at.Treblaine said:Bing is the default search engine on my placement PC's browsers. I can't stand it. The most common search on Bing must be "google" to quickly link them to a better search engine. Google is on top for a reason.Space Jawa said:Or alternatively, it would just drive their customers to go use one of the other dozens of search engines out there. Do you really think people are that attached to Google that they'd refuse to use any other search engine and go complain to the government rather than saying "hey, I wonder if I can find what I'm looking for on Bing or Yahoo instead?"?illas said:If Google goes down for a day that could kill SOPA stone dead...
Everyone got an ipad because it was so much freaking better than almost every other MP3 player out there. Shortages of iPads didn't drive them to competition, they waited rather than spend almost as much on something inferior.
For one, getting an iPad or an iPod is a far bigger commitment than deciding what web browser you're going to use on a given day, especially since you're paying a lot more money for it and you can't switch your MP3 player for another model or brand quite as easily.
Plus, given the circumstances, you'd either have to have Google or Wikipedia saying "Sorry, we don't have enough room for you to search our site right now, please come back later" OR you'd have to have Apple saying "Sorry, but we're not going to sell you an iPad right now because we're protesting X Legislation" in order for the comparison to match up.
Ok! I'll start us off! With some Susumo Hirasawa [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANasgaDH_Z0&feature=related]LordXel said:Indeed! Come around everyone, lets sing songs from The Hobbit so I can feel like Gandalf! Then afterwards we chase an internet dragon in the dark.FalloutJack said:*Starts passing around candles*
Anyone care for a round of singing?![]()
Besides, Apple never had the best mp3 players on the market -- or if they did, it was for a very brief period, before San Disk and Creative entered the market. My little Sansa from 2007 has a lot of features that apple refuses to put on their hardware even /today/, and it was a mid range model at the time. Apple has good marketing and a nice aesthetic, and that's pretty much what their media player business runs on. Their computer business runs on that, plus some exclusive software that you pretty much need if you work in certain industries.Space Jawa said:Your attempt at a comparison here kind of falls flat given the differences between your example and the situation we're looking at.Treblaine said:Bing is the default search engine on my placement PC's browsers. I can't stand it. The most common search on Bing must be "google" to quickly link them to a better search engine. Google is on top for a reason.Space Jawa said:Or alternatively, it would just drive their customers to go use one of the other dozens of search engines out there. Do you really think people are that attached to Google that they'd refuse to use any other search engine and go complain to the government rather than saying "hey, I wonder if I can find what I'm looking for on Bing or Yahoo instead?"?illas said:If Google goes down for a day that could kill SOPA stone dead...
Everyone got an ipad because it was so much freaking better than almost every other MP3 player out there. Shortages of iPads didn't drive them to competition, they waited rather than spend almost as much on something inferior.
For one, getting an iPad or an iPod is a far bigger commitment than deciding what web browser you're going to use on a given day, especially since you're paying a lot more money for it and you can't switch your MP3 player for another model or brand quite as easily.
Plus, given the circumstances, you'd either have to have Google or Wikipedia saying "Sorry, we don't have enough room for you to search our site right now, please come back later" OR you'd have to have Apple saying "Sorry, but we're not going to sell you an iPad right now because we're protesting X Legislation" in order for the comparison to match up.
I don't know if you or anyone else noticed this, but the freaking CIA website (cia.gov) is on that list. Hopefully that will raise a few eyebrows and make people give some thought to this bill.SPARTANXIII said:Kind of irrelevant, seeing how SOPA hasn't passed (For now anyway).
Still, a good way to show how any censorship on the net will end up. I have the list here for people to look at:
http://sopastrike.com/on-strike/
The few, the brave, the hateful of Youtube takedowns
It's on the list, but it's also still up -- and it's past midnight everywhere on the continent right now. I have a feeling some troll added that to the list; the CIA is a part of the government, one whose job it is to take orders from higher up in the government. I don't think they're legally able to take an official stance against a piece of legislation, at least not in a manner that public.brom0220 said:I don't know if you or anyone else noticed this, but the freaking CIA website (cia.gov) is on that list. Hopefully that will raise a few eyebrows and make people give some thought to this bill.SPARTANXIII said:Kind of irrelevant, seeing how SOPA hasn't passed (For now anyway).
Still, a good way to show how any censorship on the net will end up. I have the list here for people to look at:
http://sopastrike.com/on-strike/
The few, the brave, the hateful of Youtube takedowns
Tumblr is still up, but the CIA an Facebooks sites are down for me..so i'd say check again?The Cool Kid said:Have you been on those sites?TopazFusion said:Actually . . .The Cool Kid said:Those sites aren't part of the blackout...So why have you mentioned them?
[br]Seriously? You spam links at people, but you fail to properly read links that people provide to you.[br]![]()
[br]![]()
[br]![]()
![]()
Your credibility just reached rock-bottom.
They are all working just fine. They are not part of the blackout.
https://www.cia.gov/
https://www.facebook.com/
http://www.tumblr.com/explore
and so on. Shows the quality of the website if it falsely puts websites on it.
Dude, maybe you should actually read about the blackout <a href=http://techland.time.com/2012/01/12/sopa-reddit-confirms-january-18-blackout-wikipedia-and-others-may-follow/?iid=tl-main-mostpop1>here, because if you actually knew what you were talking about you'd know the blackout doesn't start until 8am EST. Which is 1pm GMT. Which isn't for 2 hours. So of course those sites are still up.The Cool Kid said:Have you been on those sites?TopazFusion said:Actually . . .The Cool Kid said:Those sites aren't part of the blackout...So why have you mentioned them?
[br]Seriously? You spam links at people, but you fail to properly read links that people provide to you.[br]![]()
[br]![]()
[br]![]()
![]()
Your credibility just reached rock-bottom.
They are all working just fine. They are not part of the blackout.
https://www.cia.gov/
https://www.facebook.com/
http://www.tumblr.com/explore
and so on. Shows the quality of the website if it falsely puts websites on it.