I have no shame? Grief...I'm surprised you can see the screen from looking down your nose so much.
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Yes, and like I keep saying to you, one would be pretty wacky to do so, because that means Capcom was looking to get women who like hairy muscular men into SFII.
Uh...and the problem with that is?
It's even more likely that they they were looking to appeal to MEN into other men who are hairy and muscular than what you're saying. Why aren't you talking about that possibility?
Because, unlike you, I try to keep to the argument at hand rather than inflate a statement to include all possible options.
Could it be that you can't make some "clean hands" argument about women if the objectification of men in video games is no less an appeal to men's fantasies than the DOA girls?
Nope. In fact that works equally as well. Eminem's public image is targetted towards gay men as well as hetero men; in the same way that Kylie or Madonna is.
Maybe you *should* have looked up what a "twink" is; while you're at it, check out 'bears and cubs' ;-D
Maybe I won't. Ya know, because I really am not interested.
No, it really isn't. Calling you a shithead is a flame. Letting you know that I know that you know that you've gone into 'must continue to disagree at all costs no matter what I have to wind up saying' territory isn't a flame. It's an insight ;-D
Right...Insight. Uh-huh. I forgot that you thinking you're better than me must be an insight to you. To most of the rest of us mere mortals though, it's base patronising.
We did have that. You said your explanation was probable. I said it wasn't. Those are opposing viewpoints.
Which you had no basis for. An opinion of something is not deemed false purely on an opposing opinion.
If you wanted me to strengthen my viewpoint with an alternate explanation to yours you just should have asked. Doesn't mean we weren't exchanging opposing viewpoints, though.
Asked twice now...
Well, here it is: they wanted a big wrestling character. In fact, they wanted two. They already had E.Honda, and people associate Russia with big hairy guys who can wrestle in this context. They already had enough Americans and they wanted more international characters, otherwise they would have based the character off of the American one from _Bloodsport_ played by Ogre from _Revenge of the Nerds_. Very simple explanation, right?
And more likely than not to be much further from the truth.
Really? It's more likely that Capcom was trying to get hairy chest chasing women into SFII as an explanation than that they were doing the same thing as the movie _Bloodsport_?
Well, it's unlikely that Capcom in their development stage would have watched "Revenge of the Nerds" or "Bloodsport"; and please don't deliberately misconstrue what I said. The image of Zangief was probably based on a stereotypical Russian which was then altered to appeal to players and to be easier to create for the artists.
Heh, DON'T CROSS THE STREAMS!!! This part of the discussion is about my original disagreement with your SFII example, not about my derivative points meant to show that you're missing what Lisa was trying to say, isn't it?
Dear me, I'm sorry for trying to involve others.
No--you just conflate everyone who disagrees with you together, and assign them the positions you want them to have regardless of what they are actually saying.
Are you really reading what I'm saying here? Or are you just making up arguments as you go along?
Hold on...so we're sexist for thinking the designers were influenced solely by sex? I think you have your terms muddled.
Nope--I think you've got the streams crossed.
Then please explain Egon?
I never called you sexist, so I figure Lisa must have at some point[/quote]
You figure? I'm trying to bolt you down to what you're actually saying.
Now I know you've read this, so I've just underlined the relevant details.
Those details are not relevant: look up the word "verisimilitude" in that dictionary of yours and you'll see why.
Verisimilitude in its literary context is defined as the fact or quality of being verisimilar, the appearance of being true or real; likeness or resemblance of the truth, reality or a fact?s probability. Verisimilitude comes from Latin verum meaning truth and similis meaning similar.
Nope, please explain to me why "Unrestricted by reality" does not mean "unrealistic".
Ok, let's take the characters of Mr. D'arcy, Heathcliff or Mr Rochester. Each of these is detailed very thinly (Can you tell me what hair colour any of them have?) but are put across as a man that woman want to love. They're unrealistically sketched so as to apply to the sexual image of most women.
You're confusing the words "incompletely" and "unrealistically."
Both words apply. Don't try to avoid.
Besides, let's grant for the sake of argument that all sexual fantasies are unrealistic. It does not follow that Lisa was arguing against them because they were unrealistic, because she could be arguing against them because they were the sexual fantasies of men. Realistic or not, her problem was with them being sexual fantasies.
At which point I pointed out that there were men in that situation and women not in that situation. Are you crossing the streams, or just your medication?
Your logic is that of someone who responds to "I hate dolphins because they swim in the ocean" with "why do you hate mammals--monkeys and dogs are great!"
Well, I'd try to use better syntax, grammar and punctuation; but I'd be more likely to point out that Whales also swim in the ocean, and why don't you hate them?
The difference is lost from the equation. But feel free to carry on condemning my posts, I've wanted to see how an -ism felt.
I'm not
condeming your posts; I'm pointing out how you've strayed into that
"I'll make up wacky shit like Zangeif was intended for women and Huck Finn is an Unrealistic character"
Feel free to define what condemnation is then.
My definition is not important in this case.
Avoidance of a direct question again Cheese. You're just trolling now.
Your definition seems to include the idea of unsupported, uncalled for disapproval. I am not doing that.
It includes the basis of respecting other's opinions until you can bring solid fact against them. Merely holding your nose up high and looking over your glasses at me doesn't make you any closer to the truth.
See, that's me expressing cultural relativity towards you!
Nope, that's you being patronizing. I'd advise you stop it before you run into someone who has a lesser fuse and busts your nose.
You have no shame, do you ;-D
I do have friends though. And people who agree with me.