The ism's in gaming

Recommended Videos
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
So it is wrong to believe that gaining pleasure through hurting someone is bad? I thought that was the baseline of all human morality.
Depends, if the other AGREES to be hurt, then we've no grounds for condemning it. Any sexual act between two(or more) willing participants maybe a fetish, but certainly isn't 'wrong'.

Unwilling is where morality kicks in.
 
Aug 3, 2008
17
0
0
I happen to find something particularly disturbing about the ideals pressed upon your youth. I can see it now, in 50 years time, everyone is a rabid consumer bent on being able to throw as much money as possible to whatever the box says. We can't train our childeren for war, but we can train them to spend.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
GIJED said:
I happen to find something particularly disturbing about the ideals pressed upon your youth. I can see it now, in 50 years time, everyone is a rabid consumer bent on being able to throw as much money as possible to whatever the box says. We can't train our childeren for war, but we can train them to spend.
Some could have said that 50 years ago...
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
If we perceive the conditions as mental illnesses (as they clearly are) the morality of the action goes right out the window.
You do realize you basically just said that sadomasochism is a mental illness because it offends you morally, right?

-- Alex
 

Rshady

New member
Jul 22, 2008
106
0
0
WlknCntrdiction said:
Seriously people, it's a video game. You would think that adults would put video games into context with owning a house, bringing up children, paying off the mortgage and.........OMG theres a game called fat princess that puts fat people in a bad light and I have to be vocal about it because I'm insecure about my weight and want people to know that I'm "offended", but I'm not really, I'm just insecure and can't be assed to do anything about my weight so I use the game as a scapegoat to make myself feel big(pun intended lol).

I think this pretty much sums it up. I've never seen anything in a game that is worthy of causing true offence and probably never will.
 

mshcherbatskaya

New member
Feb 1, 2008
1,698
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
lord kamina said:
you can thank Japanese character designers for most of the the over endowed women in games/anime its just how they worked they never really cared about the whole "oh my god thats sexist" or the cry of "thats raciest"
Just because someone doesn't care doesn't mean what they've done isn't sexist or racist. I don't think any of the issues in this thread were about the Japanese knowingly and deliberately creating these images for the specific purpose of being racist or sexist.
The Japanese are probably a bad example to cite in this argument. The Japanese do not really do identity politics and in fact find the concept a little incomprehensible. This will probably change as the Japanese population becomes more diverse due to the import of labor from China, Korea, the Philipines, and South America, and as feminism and gay rights become more established as social issues.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
mshcherbatskaya said:
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
lord kamina said:
you can thank Japanese character designers for most of the the over endowed women in games/anime its just how they worked they never really cared about the whole "oh my god thats sexist" or the cry of "thats raciest"
Just because someone doesn't care doesn't mean what they've done isn't sexist or racist. I don't think any of the issues in this thread were about the Japanese knowingly and deliberately creating these images for the specific purpose of being racist or sexist.
The Japanese are probably a bad example to cite in this argument. The Japanese do not really do identity politics and in fact find the concept a little incomprehensible. This will probably change as the Japanese population becomes more diverse due to the import of labor from China, Korea, the Philipines, and South America, and as feminism and gay rights become more established as social issues.
....So...

If Capcom and Sony are creating African Zombies, Obese Royalty and unrealistic female clothing it's more likely to be about misunderstanding of identity politics than about -ism's?

Can I call an end to these two threads then? Because at the moment we seem to be targetting the 'majority' as the Big Evil.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
I have no shame? Grief...I'm surprised you can see the screen from looking down your nose so much.
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Yes, and like I keep saying to you, one would be pretty wacky to do so, because that means Capcom was looking to get women who like hairy muscular men into SFII.
Uh...and the problem with that is?
It's even more likely that they they were looking to appeal to MEN into other men who are hairy and muscular than what you're saying. Why aren't you talking about that possibility?
Because, unlike you, I try to keep to the argument at hand rather than inflate a statement to include all possible options.
Could it be that you can't make some "clean hands" argument about women if the objectification of men in video games is no less an appeal to men's fantasies than the DOA girls?
Nope. In fact that works equally as well. Eminem's public image is targetted towards gay men as well as hetero men; in the same way that Kylie or Madonna is.

Maybe you *should* have looked up what a "twink" is; while you're at it, check out 'bears and cubs' ;-D
Maybe I won't. Ya know, because I really am not interested.
No, it really isn't. Calling you a shithead is a flame. Letting you know that I know that you know that you've gone into 'must continue to disagree at all costs no matter what I have to wind up saying' territory isn't a flame. It's an insight ;-D
Right...Insight. Uh-huh. I forgot that you thinking you're better than me must be an insight to you. To most of the rest of us mere mortals though, it's base patronising.

We did have that. You said your explanation was probable. I said it wasn't. Those are opposing viewpoints.
Which you had no basis for. An opinion of something is not deemed false purely on an opposing opinion.
If you wanted me to strengthen my viewpoint with an alternate explanation to yours you just should have asked. Doesn't mean we weren't exchanging opposing viewpoints, though.
Asked twice now...


Well, here it is: they wanted a big wrestling character. In fact, they wanted two. They already had E.Honda, and people associate Russia with big hairy guys who can wrestle in this context. They already had enough Americans and they wanted more international characters, otherwise they would have based the character off of the American one from _Bloodsport_ played by Ogre from _Revenge of the Nerds_. Very simple explanation, right?
And more likely than not to be much further from the truth.
Really? It's more likely that Capcom was trying to get hairy chest chasing women into SFII as an explanation than that they were doing the same thing as the movie _Bloodsport_?
Well, it's unlikely that Capcom in their development stage would have watched "Revenge of the Nerds" or "Bloodsport"; and please don't deliberately misconstrue what I said. The image of Zangief was probably based on a stereotypical Russian which was then altered to appeal to players and to be easier to create for the artists.

Heh, DON'T CROSS THE STREAMS!!! This part of the discussion is about my original disagreement with your SFII example, not about my derivative points meant to show that you're missing what Lisa was trying to say, isn't it?
Dear me, I'm sorry for trying to involve others.
No--you just conflate everyone who disagrees with you together, and assign them the positions you want them to have regardless of what they are actually saying.
Are you really reading what I'm saying here? Or are you just making up arguments as you go along?



Hold on...so we're sexist for thinking the designers were influenced solely by sex? I think you have your terms muddled.
Nope--I think you've got the streams crossed.
Then please explain Egon?
I never called you sexist, so I figure Lisa must have at some point[/quote]
You figure? I'm trying to bolt you down to what you're actually saying.

Now I know you've read this, so I've just underlined the relevant details.
Those details are not relevant: look up the word "verisimilitude" in that dictionary of yours and you'll see why.
Verisimilitude in its literary context is defined as the fact or quality of being verisimilar, the appearance of being true or real; likeness or resemblance of the truth, reality or a fact?s probability. Verisimilitude comes from Latin verum meaning truth and similis meaning similar.
Nope, please explain to me why "Unrestricted by reality" does not mean "unrealistic".

Ok, let's take the characters of Mr. D'arcy, Heathcliff or Mr Rochester. Each of these is detailed very thinly (Can you tell me what hair colour any of them have?) but are put across as a man that woman want to love. They're unrealistically sketched so as to apply to the sexual image of most women.
You're confusing the words "incompletely" and "unrealistically."
Both words apply. Don't try to avoid.

Besides, let's grant for the sake of argument that all sexual fantasies are unrealistic. It does not follow that Lisa was arguing against them because they were unrealistic, because she could be arguing against them because they were the sexual fantasies of men. Realistic or not, her problem was with them being sexual fantasies.
At which point I pointed out that there were men in that situation and women not in that situation. Are you crossing the streams, or just your medication?

Your logic is that of someone who responds to "I hate dolphins because they swim in the ocean" with "why do you hate mammals--monkeys and dogs are great!"
Well, I'd try to use better syntax, grammar and punctuation; but I'd be more likely to point out that Whales also swim in the ocean, and why don't you hate them?

The difference is lost from the equation. But feel free to carry on condemning my posts, I've wanted to see how an -ism felt.
I'm not condeming your posts; I'm pointing out how you've strayed into that "I'll make up wacky shit like Zangeif was intended for women and Huck Finn is an Unrealistic character"
Feel free to define what condemnation is then.
My definition is not important in this case.
Avoidance of a direct question again Cheese. You're just trolling now.
Your definition seems to include the idea of unsupported, uncalled for disapproval. I am not doing that.
It includes the basis of respecting other's opinions until you can bring solid fact against them. Merely holding your nose up high and looking over your glasses at me doesn't make you any closer to the truth.

See, that's me expressing cultural relativity towards you!
Nope, that's you being patronizing. I'd advise you stop it before you run into someone who has a lesser fuse and busts your nose.

You have no shame, do you ;-D
I do have friends though. And people who agree with me.
 

mshcherbatskaya

New member
Feb 1, 2008
1,698
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
mshcherbatskaya said:
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
lord kamina said:
you can thank Japanese character designers for most of the the over endowed women in games/anime its just how they worked they never really cared about the whole "oh my god thats sexist" or the cry of "thats raciest"
Just because someone doesn't care doesn't mean what they've done isn't sexist or racist. I don't think any of the issues in this thread were about the Japanese knowingly and deliberately creating these images for the specific purpose of being racist or sexist.
The Japanese are probably a bad example to cite in this argument. The Japanese do not really do identity politics and in fact find the concept a little incomprehensible. This will probably change as the Japanese population becomes more diverse due to the import of labor from China, Korea, the Philipines, and South America, and as feminism and gay rights become more established as social issues.
....So...

If Capcom and Sony are creating African Zombies, Obese Royalty and unrealistic female clothing it's more likely to be about misunderstanding of identity politics than about -ism's?

Can I call an end to these two threads then? Because at the moment we seem to be targetting the 'majority' as the Big Evil.
I'm not excusing it at all. I actually think that the lack of a concept of "diversity" in Japan is a real problem that limits their potential global participation on a number of levels. So just as I think that lack of diversity (to use a clumsy and ill-defined term) in the gaming industry is a serious business issue that limits expansion, I think it is similarly an issue with the Japanese.

That being the case, what I am saying it that pointing to the Japanese and saying, "Well, they don't have a problem with it!" or "The Japanese are a lot worse than us!" is not a particularly useful argument.

As far as calling an end to the thread, you can do that at any time. Just stop posting to it. I quit reading it a long time ago, and the only reason I'm posting over here now is that I was seeing what Cheeze was up to, just happened to see the comment about Japanese games, and identity politics or lack thereof in Japan happens to be an interest of mine.

One of the main factors that keeps this thread from falling off the first page is the continued to-ing and fro-ing between you and Cheeze. I bet the thing would die pretty quickly if either one of you stopped feeding it, and you seem to be more sick of it than he is. If this thread was a game and you found it as boring, repetitive, and pointless, you would have quit playing a long time ago, wouldn't you?
 

lord kamina

New member
Jun 24, 2008
78
0
0
Just because people didn't care doesn't mean it was okay.
never heard anyone complaining back also i do wonder why they did change her dress in the alpha series to that jump suit thing?
 

lord kamina

New member
Jun 24, 2008
78
0
0
yes they did star wars and star trek fans where all over the place and they didn't have the internet to ***** on so it was all done in the local comic book/game shops, shadow run was all the rage, fantasy games and movies was the dog bollocks for the old school hardcore gamers aka sweaty nerds in the basement sat playing D&D and as for the costume change because it was a bad move thats why they went back to the old style in 3rd strike, i miss the back then period...(emo tier)
 

lord kamina

New member
Jun 24, 2008
78
0
0
Okay, so, what's you're point?
that people could talk about things like sf 2 and such but didn't complain back then all they argued about was who would win in a fight between Mario and sonic or how a street fighter movie may or may not be awesome if you have ever seen an old games mag you would see what i mean