I get where your mom is coming from but seriously, the series has been stagnant. Lara is an interesting character. But an untapped one. When they make her shallow as they have, she isn't interesting at all. Her back story and who they CLAIM she is is interesting, but who she actually is in the game is a smarmy rich chick with daddy issues and a nice rack. Her potential way outshines her current design.
I would say how the hell did she not recognize her if she plays that often? But I am not sure how I recognized her right off the bat. I am a pretty large Tomb Raider fan and when I saw the cover I got excited that they may finally be "fixing" Lara. Tomb Raider's stories are decent but the back story has gaping holes and is diluted with contrived "mysterious" BS writing. The dialogue can be horrendous at times. This is me speaking as a fan.
What the character and the story has is potential but potential is worthless if never tapped into. The puzzles are decent in every title if sometimes a little railroaded. But they are addressing that too. They are doing more than just reimagining Lara. In the article they tell you that you are going to learn how Lara came to be the Lady we know.
Paragon Fury said:
"But she isn't supposed to be "realistic". She is supposed to be a fearless, beautiful treasure hunter who goes anywhere and does pretty much anything. This Lara looks like a random, average college student who looks like she'd shit herself at the sight of a large dog, much less having to fight a pack of wolves moments into her first adventure. If they're trying to "fix" the series, why would they mess with the part that really never had anything "wrong" with it?"
Kudos for the team then because that is exactly what they wanted her to look like. If you had read the article you would know this is Lara fresh out of College in her younger years when she first started adventuring. She is naive and young and most important, human. She has fears, and inadequacies, and all that jive. We may actually get to learn about her father finally and the family business rather than have it clouded in that irritating "mystery fog" that is cliche and just plain bad writing. We are actually going to get to 'meet' Lara instead of just see her. This is how she was originally intended to be seen anyways. The previous Lara was big wigs whoring her out to adolescents.
I would have told her the truth, "Because
most of the fanbase is bored with her. She isn't an interesting character to the majority of the fanbase and they are
LOSING the fanbase because of it. It isn't just that but come on, everybody here at the escapist knows the shallow portrayal of Lara all to well. Hell, she is frequently sited here as an example of a shallow character. Some of us fans will mention her untapped potential but we are few and far between.
Of course the point was driven even further home when after I shrugged she added "And I'm not going to lie; from that mugshot, if it wasn't for the lips, you wouldn't be able to tell if that was a man or a woman. Lara always had way more feminine features than that."
And some people just really hate change and have to adjust before they can see it as better. She may like it down the road much more than the previous ones. Some people need time to accept change. Not saying she will for sure, but it is a human trait. We fear change instinctively. Especially, in the case of fanboys/girls.
Its just one example, but I think it makes the point pretty clearly; when someone who loves the games and has played pretty much on releases ever since they came out cannot recognize the main character on sight, but rather has to be told and shown who it is, you've gone too far. For all intents on purposes, it might as well be a different character.
I recognized her on site and I play a much wider selection of games and am a fan of Tomb Raider. I see no validation in that point. Is what it is, is she didn't see the "graphic" her mind has associated with Lara. Lara is more of an Icon. Lara is an aesthetic memory recognition for her. I can show an easy demonstration of this if I have to but can't be bothered to google some images right now.
And they don't even have the same out that the new Devil May Cry Dante does, in that the "new" Dante will wind up looking more like the "old" Dante by the end of the new game, since its supposed to explain how he wound up like that.
Unless Lara gets some serious plastic surgery, "new" ain't looking like "old" ever again.
Well considering that is like 19 year old Lara, they could swing it back that way a bit. I mean she is roughed up in the photos. You know, we have never seen what she looks like "roughed up" EVER. Despite crawling in tombs and in gunfights and twirly flipping, all her hairs stay in place. I think people fear change a little too much. When this info was first released I was going to make a thread about it. (I actually still have it saved in notepad and may end up assimilating it in with a review when TR is released.) But then one popped up and after reading so much QQ about a character nobody ever seemed to give a damn about and would even
***** about beforehand I decided it wasn't worth it. Some people just want to cry about video games regardless and I knew my thread would drag em all in.