Yes.SkarKrow said:Alot isn't a word. A lot. It's two. Was that what you were getting at?
When you browse the forums now, look at how many people correctly use a lot and how many do not.
Yes.SkarKrow said:Alot isn't a word. A lot. It's two. Was that what you were getting at?
Lyri was almost eaten by an alot. Luckily 2fish rushed in and saved Lyri with literally the best sword ever. 2fish was wearing the objectively most stylish shoes in the room. 2fish?s sword was all irony.Lyri said:Yes.SkarKrow said:Alot isn't a word. A lot. It's two. Was that what you were getting at?
When you browse the forums now, look at how many people correctly use a lot and how many do not.
Perhaps you keep seeing the term because so much of arguing on the Net involves people making them. Just look at any big argument about sexism, feminism, ism'ism -- it's all people beating up the bogeyman versions of things they are upset about. That's what it is. But yes, it does get used too much when an actual description of WHY would be more valuable.BarbaricGoose said:MrDeckard said:Strawman - Noun
A statement characterized by being a counter-argument.Gonna go ahead and agree with these.DugMachine said:-Strawman (only applied here as I've heard it nowhere outside these forums)
I don't think most people know what they mean when they say it. Hell, I don't even know what it means. It just screams "Look at me and this new word I learned! I'll try to sound intelligent when actually I'd never use this word in real life, just petty forum arguments!"
I learned that word probably about 20 years ago, and never--LITERALLY never--heard the word again until I discovered the Escapist. Since then, I've heard it at least once a month. You can't find a thread with an argument and not see "Strawman" pop up at least 3 times per page. If the Escapist had a mascot, it'd b one of these guys:
Strawman. STRAWMAN. STRAWMAN!UberNoodle said:Perhaps you keep seeing the term because so much of arguing on the Net involves people making them. Just look at any big argument about sexism, feminism, ism'ism -- it's all people beating up the bogeyman versions of things they are upset about. That's what it is. But yes, it does get used too much when an actual description of WHY would be more valuable.
That'd be the joke.SkarKrow said:Alot isn't a word. A lot. It's two. Was that what you were getting at? I make that as a genuine mistake.Lyri said:Alot.
![]()
BarbaricGoose said:Strawman. STRAWMAN. STRAWMAN!UberNoodle said:Perhaps you keep seeing the term because so much of arguing on the Net involves people making them. Just look at any big argument about sexism, feminism, ism'ism -- it's all people beating up the bogeyman versions of things they are upset about. That's what it is. But yes, it does get used too much when an actual description of WHY would be more valuable.
I wasn't saying they weren't right to use the word, I was just saying it gets used a lot.
And don't even say I didn't use it correctly. Because I probably didn't. But neither does anyone else. Quit being such a strawman.
SkarKrow said:Alot isn't a word. A lot. It's two. Was that what you were getting at? I make that as a genuine mistake.Lyri said:Alot.
![]()
Ah thats good, just making sure that I got it. I'm a touch dumb that way!
That'd be the joke.
That picture is saying "Alot" is some sort of horned creature, and not simply a misspelled version of "A lot." The joke is that so many people misspell "A lot."
See also. "Sorry, but..."Hjalmar Fryklund said:Oh yes. See also "I am not homophobic/sexist, but..."JimB said:If I may stretch the rules of the game a bit?
No offense, but:
-A phrase preceding a deliberately offensive statement, intended to absolve the speaker of any responsibility for giving offense.