The most hilarious screw ups in history

Recommended Videos

The Artificially Prolonged

Random Semi-Frequent Poster
Jul 15, 2008
2,755
0
0
Eleuthera said:
I have a nice Dutch one.

During WWII, after already having been invaded (but not yet defeated) by the Germans, the government still refused to allow the armed forced to go over budget. No extra people, no extra ammo, nothing.

I'm not saying we would've beaten the german with some extra cash, but still refusing to send your own army extra cash during an invasion that's gotta be up there somewhere...
You'd think you would get at least time and a half during an invasion :p
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,681
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
IamQ said:
Regalskeppet Vasa. If you are Swedish then this is the first thing you will think of. It was in the 1600s, Sweden was becoming a major power in Europe and to survive a 30-year long war with Russia amongst other countries, we needed a good fleet. So a ship was built was build to lead the fleet, named after the first Swedish King (Gustav Vasa). It had two decks of canons, gold and jewels everywhere... and it was also too heavy on one side.

Long story short: It leaves the dock and sinks after 200 meters from the wind.
Only just remembered about the Vasa (rather an unlucky set of circumstances when that was the king's name as well...). It just about bankrupted Sweden as well at the time while they were still squabbling with Poland... and IIRC, their king (Sigismund III) was one of Gustav's in-laws and a fairly close one at that.

The Swedish Mary Rose, only a little bit more laughable, no disrespect if you're Swedish... -_-
 

IamQ

New member
Mar 29, 2009
5,226
0
0
SckizoBoy said:
IamQ said:
Regalskeppet Vasa. If you are Swedish then this is the first thing you will think of. It was in the 1600s, Sweden was becoming a major power in Europe and to survive a 30-year long war with Russia amongst other countries, we needed a good fleet. So a ship was built was build to lead the fleet, named after the first Swedish King (Gustav Vasa). It had two decks of canons, gold and jewels everywhere... and it was also too heavy on one side.

Long story short: It leaves the dock and sinks after 200 meters from the wind.
Only just remembered about the Vasa (rather an unlucky set of circumstances when that was the king's name as well...). It just about bankrupted Sweden as well at the time while they were still squabbling with Poland... and IIRC, their king (Sigismund III) was one of Gustav's in-laws and a fairly close one at that.

The Swedish Mary Rose, only a little bit more laughable, no disrespect if you're Swedish... -_-
It's okay. I mean 200 meters? That's got to be one of the first Darwin Award winners surely. At least it keeps selling museum tickets...
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,681
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
IamQ said:
It's okay. I mean 200 meters? That's got to be one of the first Darwin Award winners surely. At least it keeps selling museum tickets...
What's stupid is that the ship was so unstable... even when in port and not moving! It got capsized by a light squall, and the captain was an idiot as well (leaving the gunports open so he could salute the king, who was in Germany at the time)!
 

Spade Lead

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,042
0
0
Belaam said:
I don't really rate the war ones as hilarious as they led to a lot of death (likewise any that may go up involving people holding evidence-free religious beliefs). However, I'll stick with the military theme that has developed from the OP

Either the oil embargo against Japan in 1941 or Japan's raid on Pearl Harbor (neither went well).

Situation: The U.S. started an oil embargo against Japan (which got 80% of its oil from the U.S.) to force them out of China and do what the U.S. wanted.

How the U.S. screwed up: Japan realized that if they attacked any neighboring countries with oil, the U.S. would attack them, so they decided to take out the U.S.'s fleet all at once. Which they were able to do reasonably easily as the U.S. conveniently put most of their navy in the same place.
Actually, The Admiral in charge of the operation considered it a failure because not a single aircraft carrier was sunk. In the end, he was right.

Situation: Suffering from a lack of oil, Japan takes out the U.S.'s Navy and hopes to gain oil supplies before the U.S. rebuilds its fleet.

How Japan screwed up: The U.S. rebuilt much faster than expected, getting oil supplies took longer, and, you know, atomic weapons.
Actually, those three are unrelated. The atomic weapons were already in development before the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The U.S. had thousands of people capable of working, looking for work, that couldn't get jobs because of the economy. When the government said "Build this!" the American people said, "For Freedom" and the economy spooled up to build everything it would need to take over a continent. Of course, with no one knowing what the Americans were capable of building because half our workforce wasn't working, we spooled up for war even faster than our own allies thought we would.

As for the problem with conquering China for their oil:

no plan of operations extends with any certainty beyond the first contact with the main hostile force. [http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Helmuth_von_Moltke_the_Elder]

That is a quote by a German military commander. The Axis should have known better.

Really, any player of the Civ games could have predicted these screw ups: if you make demands of a country that can't fulfill the demands OR if you attack a more developed country to get its supply nodes and fail, you're going to pay for it.
Really? Anyone from that era who played Civ games would have known better? Where do you think the creators of Civ got their pre-programmed responses from?

You are mistaking hindsight with common sense.
 

IamQ

New member
Mar 29, 2009
5,226
0
0
SckizoBoy said:
IamQ said:
It's okay. I mean 200 meters? That's got to be one of the first Darwin Award winners surely. At least it keeps selling museum tickets...
What's stupid is that the ship was so unstable... even when in port and not moving! It got capsized by a light squall, and the captain was an idiot as well (leaving the gunports open so he could salute the king, who was in Germany at the time)!
The canons were also a major part of it's faliure. Because it had 64 cannons, it required 2 decks for them, but the lower deck was so low, that the gunports started filling up with water instantly when it tipped only a bit.
 

Roxas1359

Burn, Burn it All!
Aug 8, 2009
33,758
1
0
Looked through the thread and I don't think I saw this. Always makes me laugh because he's got such a smug look on his face:

Silly Dewey. Silly silly Dewey. XD
 

Malty Milk Whistle

New member
Oct 29, 2011
617
0
0
IamQ said:
Regalskeppet Vasa. If you are Swedish then this is the first thing you will think of. It was in the 1600s, Sweden was becoming a major power in Europe and to survive a 30-year long war with Russia amongst other countries, we needed a good fleet. So a ship was built was build to lead the fleet, named after the first Swedish King (Gustav Vasa). It had two decks of canons, gold and jewels everywhere... and it was also too heavy on one side.

Long story short: It leaves the dock and sinks after 200 meters from the wind.
Just like the Mary Rose, a Huge ass ship that one of the Henrys commissioned, it sunk before it's first engagement. There's also this local legend that this saxon king was hiding in some marshes, working as a helper to this old witch lady, and he burned a tray of cookie/biscuit/cake things.
Those wacky Saxons.
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,681
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
IamQ said:
The canons were also a major part of it's faliure. Because it had 64 cannons, it required 2 decks for them, but the lower deck was so low, that the gunports started filling up with water instantly when it tipped only a bit.
Low gundeck... plus high stern castle... plus short keel... plus heavy broadside (I think the Vasa had the heaviest broadside for its size... by quite some distance, even leading into the 'modern rating' era) = *derp* ... -_- All the guns were 24lbers as well, which made it worse...
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,286
0
0
Spade Lead said:
Really, any player of the Civ games could have predicted these screw ups: if you make demands of a country that can't fulfill the demands OR if you attack a more developed country to get its supply nodes and fail, you're going to pay for it.
Really? Anyone from that era who played Civ games would have known better? Where do you think the creators of Civ got their pre-programmed responses from?

You are mistaking hindsight with common sense.
I'm pretty sure that's a joke, along these lines:


Anything North Korea has done recently has been pretty darn hilarious, although unfortunately they're the only ones not in on the big joke, which is a problem when your country believes it's own spin and pours all it's GDP into maintaining it's Cold War Era army and creating massive propaganda marches and monuments while its people live in poverty.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Malty Milk Whistle said:
There's also this local legend that this saxon king was hiding in some marshes, working as a helper to this old witch lady, and he burned a tray of cookie/biscuit/cake things.
Those wacky Saxons.
Peasants, and he was in hiding after losing a battle, IIRC.

Also, those cake things are really easy to burn.
 

Maxtro

New member
Feb 13, 2011
940
0
0
Terrorists affiliated with al-Qaeda, originating from Afghanistan attack the World Trade Center buildings in New York on September 11th, 2001.

March 20th, 2003, the United States of America begins a full scale invasion of Iraq, believed to be harboring al-Qaeda terrorists and possessing WMD's. Both were later confirmed to be false.

Five years later former President Bush tells in an interview, "The biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/02/george-bush-iraq-interview
 

busterkeatonrules

- in Glorious Black & White!
Legacy
Jun 22, 2009
1,280
0
41
Country
Norway
During the Russo-Japanese war, the Russian admiralty decided to send their battleships to Japan - the long way, around most of the Eurasian continent, a voyage which lasted almost as long as the war itself. (Vodka was involved.)

In the early stages of the voyage, a British fishing boat was encountered - and mistaken for a Japanese battle cruiser. (Vodka was involved.) Hundreds of shots were fired. Casualties: 3 fishermen, 2 russians. (MUCH vodka was involved.) Avoiding a war with Britain took some serious diplomatic skills.

And finally, on arrival in Japanese waters, the entire Russian fleet was pwned almost immediately. (Sake was not involved.)

Also, the very existence of the USS William D. Porter [http://www.cracked.com/article_19637_the-5-craziest-war-stories-all-happened-same-ship.html].
 

Darren716

New member
Jul 7, 2011
784
0
0
I love the parallel between Napoleon and Hitler, Napoleon is never able to cross the English channel because of Britain's navy Hitler tries and is stopped by the navy. Napoleon invades Russia but gets stranded during the winter and loses a majority of his troops, Hitler makes the same exact mistake.

EDIT: Another one I just thought of. The first assassination attempt against a US president was against Andrew Jackson the attempt failed when both of the would be Assassin's flint lock pistols miss fired due to the humid weather and after his guns went off Jackson personally beet him with his cane and Davy Crockett apprehended him. While he was being interrogated he claimed to be King Richard III.