Dunno if anyone has already pulled this dick move (too many posts now to sift through) but I have to say that dangerous and toxic aren't interchangeable. Toxic is stuff like brevitoxin which is harmful through ingestion. Liquid nitrogen is an asphyxant when it vapourises back into nitrogen simply because it will stop you from taking up oxygen (like how carbon monoxide is), and explosives and napalm... well...
That's not to say that all explosives and asphyxants are non-toxic, but water and nitrogen, regardless of physical state, is non-toxic. The incredibly low temperature of liquid nitrogen is the only danger with it really... Nitrogen under standard conditions is basically inert, so therefore couldn't be toxic. The low temperature is a nightmare though, I can corroborate this due to the large burns I sustained when some prick spilled about half a litre of it over me by barging the tank while I was using it (you can still just about make out the scars several months on). Water... well, considering a massive amount of it is found in the body, we'd be pretty boned if it was toxic (to an appreciable level... given enough of anything you'd probably die).
Everyday toxicity can be found with nicotine, as has been mentioned, as well as stuff as commonplace as chocolate. Chocolate can lead to severe toxic damage to the nervous system, and death, but for humans this would take in excess of 20lbs. Nicotine, in a volume to form a barely visible droplet, dripped onto the tongue, is sufficient to kill an adult. It ranks alongside tetrodotoxin (and other animal venoms) and brevitoxin as one of the most toxic natural products. Also, any heavy metals, unless sufficiently chelated (bound) will do massive damage, such as gadolinium (3+ ion) used in MRI contrast agents.
Sorry... just finished the third year of a 4 years masters chemistry degree this afternoon with a synoptic exam... I'm reeling off so much chemistry to any situation at the moment, so I'm sorry
