You know, I?ve heard people say that there?s more than one gender, and point to intersex people. But, I?m sorry?how? Even if they?re born with both genitalia or something, aren?t they still technically both male and female? That?s not a new gender; that?s just a combination of the only two existing ones. What would be the ?other genders?? I hope I don?t come off as totally ignorant, since I?m willing to learn.
Oh, and in case some people didn?t know, there are some asexuals that can be attracted to another romantically, just not sexually. There?s a distinct difference which many don?t seem to separate, or have the ability to, in relationships. And it?s not as if all asexuals have no sexual activeness or interest at all. I mean, haven?t you ever just masturbated without an aid and just focused on exploring your body without thinking of a man or a woman? Especially when you were younger? Yeah. And, as I aforementioned, some just like sex, no matter who it?s with. Just because asexuals are a minority doesn?t mean they don?t exist. They?ve done sexology tests for all this stuff, haven?t they?
So yeah, you can get sexually comfortable heterosexual men that have had sex with other men and still identify as heterosexual, and you can get sexually active asexuals with relationships with others. And just count how many gay guys in the public eye there are who have had children with women. Humans are?complicated.
And I?m one of those people who finds the category of ?pansexuality? mostly worthless, because it?s basically the same as bisexual, just with less focus on the sexual attraction and more on the romantic attraction. Just because you like transsexuals doesn?t make you pansexual, since a trans woman would overall exhibit the traits of a genetic woman, even if she has a few angular features and a penis. I?m straight, I?ve got something of a trans fetish (that encompasses transsexuals and transvestites, oddly enough; although, of course, it depends), and I probably wouldn?t mind banging a trans woman either, because I?d still class her as just a woman nonetheless. Just with that something special. Not much different than cute freckles, a unique hair colour or a charismatic attitude.
I have been compelled to say that, objectively, women are sexier than men, but that would be an oversimplified way of describing things I don?t quite know how to describe in a competent enough way. Does anyone know what I?m talking about? I?m just saying, even aside from society?s effect itself, there seems to be quite an?imbalance, which might make sense from a purely biological standpoint. Maybe men are ?meant? to be more sexually attracted to women (and more consistently) than women are ?meant? to be sexually attracted to men, and the conventional missionary sex is basically the man giving and the woman taking. And I think I recall someone here saying that the female orgasm has no biological purpose, whereas the male needs to orgasm to inseminate (or whatever the scientific word for it is) the woman?s eggs. Although a man can orgasm without ejaculation, but I think that takes so much training that it?s virtually irrelevant.
To be honest, I find the whole thing quite fascinating, and I can't possibly imagine how someone can dislike another just because they happen to like a member of the same sex. But I know, humans will be humans.
