The Puppy Killer Gets What She Deserves

[Oh That Dude]

She was found in real life, and is currently facing charges up to 6400 US dollars. This should happen instead.

No, breaking of fingers and toes should happen. Then the bamboo bits being hammered up under her nais. Then she gets her feet put into boiling water until the skin boils of her feet. After that she gets her hands and feet hacked of and gets rolled into a bog. Thats justice.

Right, few things:
1. WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS HYPOCRISY
2. WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS HYPOCRISY
3. You don't react this way to someone who murders something not so cute. Even if that someone is a person. So yeah. Might wanna think about priorities.

Killing a person usually has motives and such behind it. Killing bugs is acceptable as they are pests and can be potentially dangerous to your health. To kill a defenseless newborn puppy is simply an act out of pure evil, especially if you giggle while doing it.

Its simply a disgusting and evil act, like rape or pedophelia wich both warrants even worse punishments. So you can shove it.

Wait, so the fact that it has motives makes it better? No.
Killing defenceless little bugs on the basis that they are pests is little different to killing a dog because you can't afford to keep it, i.e. it is a pest.
Also, paedophilia isn't in and of itself a crime or wrong. Child abuse is wrong. And yeah, you definitely show them who has the moral high ground when you torture them in the name of punishment.

 

[Nouw]

Here comes the memes... ahem!

She deserves worse. And I mean Saw worse.
Made me a bit better.

 

[Boba Frag]

Animal Kingdom WINS!

*applauds video*

Fantastic.

Yes, beware and god help you should you harm one of natures cutest animals. The animal kingdom will then team up to kick your ass.

If only, huh?

Glad to hear that wretched person is getting investigated/prosecuted now too.

 

[TheYellowCellPhone]

Very good editing, I like.

Human lives are worth infinitely more than dog lives. Human's have the potential to impact the world in ways that dogs just can't.

It upsets me that people would put the lives of virtually useless animals before humans.

What? WHAT? I'm sorry, my dear sir, but I highly disagree.

You may judge humans as higher than animals, but that doesn't mean animals are useless. In fact, we owe our advancement to an animal's sacrifice.

Also, you don't find anything wrong with killing animals? Especially baby animals?

 

[Kenko]

She was found in real life, and is currently facing charges up to 6400 US dollars. This should happen instead.

No, breaking of fingers and toes should happen. Then the bamboo bits being hammered up under her nais. Then she gets her feet put into boiling water until the skin boils of her feet. After that she gets her hands and feet hacked of and gets rolled into a bog. Thats justice.

Right, few things:
1. WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS HYPOCRISY
2. WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS HYPOCRISY
3. You don't react this way to someone who murders something not so cute. Even if that someone is a person. So yeah. Might wanna think about priorities.

Killing a person usually has motives and such behind it. Killing bugs is acceptable as they are pests and can be potentially dangerous to your health. To kill a defenseless newborn puppy is simply an act out of pure evil, especially if you giggle while doing it.

Its simply a disgusting and evil act, like rape or pedophelia wich both warrants even worse punishments. So you can shove it.

Wait, so the fact that it has motives makes it better? No.
Killing defenceless little bugs on the basis that they are pests is little different to killing a dog because you can't afford to keep it, i.e. it is a pest.
Also, paedophilia isn't in and of itself a crime or wrong. Child abuse is wrong. And yeah, you definitely show them who has the moral high ground when you torture them in the name of punishment.

Ah yes, the moronic modern day mentality of helping the offenders and not giving he victims any justice. Ah its so disgusting it makes my stomache want to leap out of my mouth. And wow, defending pedophelia? You're one sick puppy.

 

[Cheesus333]

Human lives are worth infinitely more than dog lives. Human's have the potential to impact the world in ways that dogs just can't.

It upsets me that people would put the lives of virtually useless animals before humans.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear...

I'm not the sort of anti-human/pro-animal person who would sooner kill a man with a rusty spork than see a kitten stuck in a tree, but even so this comment is pretty messed up. A life is a life, regardless of species or 'impact on the world'. I don't like to argue when it comes to matters of opinion, but this actually kind of offends me.
Let me ask you this, then - this girl (to whom no harm actually came anyway) tries to kill six puppies by flinging them into a river. In this, she is a murderer, objectively speaking. Now granted I don't know the full background of the puppies in question, but I'm willing to assume that they've never actually done anything wrong to anyone - or, if they have, certainly nothing worth death by drowning. Do you still think that she deserves her miserable existence more than the baby dogs she tried to kill?

 

[InfernoJesus]

Human lives are worth infinitely more than dog lives. Human's have the potential to impact the world in ways that dogs just can't.

It upsets me that people would put the lives of virtually useless animals before humans.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear...

I'm not the sort of anti-human/pro-animal person who would sooner kill a man with a rusty spork than see a kitten stuck in a tree, but even so this comment is pretty messed up. A life is a life, regardless of species or 'impact on the world'. I don't like to argue when it comes to matters of opinion, but this actually kind of offends me.
Let me ask you this, then - this girl (to whom no harm actually came anyway) tries to kill six puppies by flinging them into a river. In this, she is a murderer, objectively speaking. Now granted I don't know the full background of the puppies in question, but I'm willing to assume that they've never actually done anything wrong to anyone - or, if they have, certainly nothing worth death by drowning. Do you still think that she deserves her miserable existence more than the baby dogs she tried to kill?

In short, you're asking for my interpretation of modern society's morals in this situation. I'm not going to give it, as it seems that modern society's morals are the result of generations of moral misinterpretations and are near obsolete.

I try to think about the results of my actions, rather than the actions themselves. It helps me stay away from the influence of mundane customs that society has developed.

 

[Tanis]

John Smith was a pedophile....just saying.

OT: Decent vid, girl is lucky that wasn't cats she was tossing.

 

[Oh That Dude]

Ah yes, the moronic modern day mentality of helping the offenders and not giving he victims any justice.

Lol, learn to read please. I never claimed I wasn't in favour of punishment for crimes. I simply said torture such as what you described is a fucking moronic idea: a) it's hugely cruel, hypocritically, and b) how can you hold the moral high ground if you torture people?

Ah its so disgusting it makes my stomache want to leap out of my mouth. And wow, defending pedophelia? You're one sick puppy.

I'll defend paedophilia, sure. I won't defend acting on the desires resulting from it, in case I didn't make that explicitly clear, but it's not like the desires themselves can be helped.

Anyway, so so far you've strawman'd and defended the suggestion that torture is a viable punishment for animal abusers. Seems kinda like you might just possibly be trolling.

 

[Axolotl]

Human lives are worth infinitely more than dog lives. Human's have the potential to impact the world in ways that dogs just can't.

It upsets me that people would put the lives of virtually useless animals before humans.

Do you honestly think that the sort of person who would kill harmless creatures for amusement will have a positive impact upon the world?

 

[littlebunnyfifi]

Yaaay, *****-eating sharks rule!

 

[duchaked]

I have to say, I did enjoy that. As did the dog and freshwater man-eating shark in the river judging by the smiles.

lol freshwater man-eating sharks are the best (worst? haha)

 

[WhoaItsBrett]

Why do you value the lives of other animals equally with humans?

I value life in general.
All life is equal, whether it be a human life, or the life of a bug.
I feel that we don't have the right to try and assume our lives are any more important than the life of a dog. (or any other animal.)
All life is important.
I'll throw out there that I do eat meat, and have killed a bug before.
But I don't think for a second that I'm anymore important then the animal I may be eating, or the bug I may have stepped on.

You can't say that all life is equal while eating meat. Especially, the way animals are treated by the meat industry.

I can, and did say that all life is equal.
I eat meat because I believe it is natural.
I also get my meat from local farmers, ones who treat their animals properly.
I don't think its right to try and "compare" one living things life worth with anothers.
Life, is life. Plain and simple, whether it be a bugs life, or a humans, or a dogs. Killing an animal to eat it, is fine. But killing one of boredom, or to just have "fun" isn't. Life isn't something we should take away just to have "fun."

 

[Blatherscythe]

Yaaay, *****-eating sharks rule!

Agreed. They are awesome.

 

[Mighty the Moose]

Human lives are worth infinitely more than dog lives. Human's have the potential to impact the world in ways that dogs just can't.

It upsets me that people would put the lives of virtually useless animals before humans.

And this point is supposed to justify her behavior?

It is one thing stating that human lives are intrinsically more valuable than non-human ones, its something else entirely to state that cruelty to animals is acceptable. I hope that is not what you are implying...

Also, with which strange metric are you measuring the usefulness of a life, human or not?

You go think about it, and I'll go get some popcorn ready for what I am sure is to be some profound philosophy.

I value everything based on how it will/may impact my life. If an animal being killed does not have the potential to impact me whatsoever, said incident has no value to me.

I determine the usefulness of a life based on its potential to impact society as a whole. Using this metric, you will likely come to the same conclusion I have. In fact, in this case, this girl's amusement is likely more useful than the dog's life, therefor I condone this act of "cruelty".

Backing up an argument with morals obsoletes the argument, as morals are illogical ideals, implanted into children at birth.

How completely juvenile and trite your points are. I recently heard a 14-year old spout an analogously inane set of "arguments" a few days ago. I smiled and gave him a pat on the head as he was coming into his intellectual own and was the son of a friend.

And of course you didn't answer the question. "I determine the usefulness of a life based on its potential to impact society as a whole" is about a meaningless a statement as any I've heard.

 

[Engarde]

Meanwhile, in poverty. I am sorry to everyone who loves animals out there, I just cannot get...motivated about them, whilst the huge amounts of issues plague human society. I do not want to argue, as my opinion is just that, and opinion. I guess I am just a...hmm....speciesist? I do not know.

 

[Jezzascmezza]

Pity that didn't actually happen.

 

[Sir Thomas Sean Connery]

Wasn't as funny as the original.

 

[SAMAS]

Personally, I think that's wrong too. You don't want your dog to have puppies, then spay the *****(and I mean that literally).

But then, those farmers aren't stupid enough to brag about it by putting a video of it online.

And sometimes that's the difference between necessary Evil and real Evil: You're not supposed to take pleasure in it.

 

[Mighty the Moose]

Meanwhile, in poverty. I am sorry to everyone who loves animals out there, I just cannot get...motivated about them, whilst the huge amounts of issues plague human society. I do not want to argue, as my opinion is just that, and opinion. I guess I am just a...hmm....speciesist? I do not know.

It seems that you are incorrectly treating animal welfare and human-centric social welfare as a zero-sum game. It's not one or the other. Yes, it is absurd how poorly our attempts to alleviate human suffering have failed. That does not mean, however, there is no room to conduct ourselves respectfully and humanely towards animals in addition to each other. There is clearly space for both.

BTW, I grew up amongst poverty when my family was assigned to Africa. You have a computer, an internet connection and the time to post on this website in contrast to more than 95% of the world's population.