Favourite Post Title of 2012 so far.Lazier Than Thou said:The right to bear drain cleaner?
Favourite Post Title of 2012 so far.Lazier Than Thou said:The right to bear drain cleaner?
You're right, it won't help. There are just too many people who buy drain cleaner and the like for any registry to help. It's crap, but so is the NDAA, the SOPA, and a whole lot of other laws on the books both federally and in several states. Hell, look at the assault-weapon ban in california. It's practically a handbook on how not to make a gun law.Lazier Than Thou said:So in Illinois, there's a new state law stating that:
Why?http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/01/05/new-law-requires-photo-id-to-buy-drain-cleaner/ said:A new state law requires those who buy drain cleaners and other caustic substances to provide photo identification and sign a log.
This leads me to a question and maybe it's a stupid question.the article said:State Rep. Jack Franks (D-Woodstock) obtained passage of the new law following attacks in which drain cleaner was poured on two Chicago women, badly scarring them.
What in the name of all that is holy is wrong with the government officials in Illinois? In what possible way could this, even theoretically, help prevent(or even help apprehend) someone doing this exact same crime in the future?
Look, I understand gun registration or background checks and all that. I don't necessarily agree with it, but I understand where it's coming from. This just blows me out of the water.
What happened to those poor women is absolutely deplorable. I'm not going to suggest otherwise. But making people show a photo ID when the buy drain cleaner is not going to change what happened or prevent it from happening again. I even have serious doubts it'll help in finding the dirtbag that would have committed such a heinous crime.
I don't even have words for this anymore. Thoughts?
There's a brand of lemonade that's probably the same, it's just slightly alcoholized, and I was buying it since age 12, I think. It had only 0.05% alcohol, though.Lawnmooer said:Thats a bit excessive...
Though I've always wondered if any criminals ever tried using drain cleaner to dissolve bodies (Due to bathroom varieties being designed to dissolve hair and dead skin that clog up bath drains)
Also I recently found out that in certain shops I frequent that you need to be 18 and have ID to buy Lemonade Shandy (<0.1% vol of alcohol) and need to be 21 and have ID to buy lighters (Yet other shops allowed me to buy Zippo's and lighter fluid and the like at 16)
It seems some people are a bit paranoid about youths being idiots and criminals...
All that hair clogs their shower drain silly.teknoarcanist said:Why would a bear need drain-cleaner?
I umm... okay? Where the heck are you coming from here? Is this a concern in Illinois? Last time I checked poor people can vote too and a state ID isn't required by law. If it was it'd either have to be privatized or free.ravenshrike said:What's really funny is the dipshit who got this law passed would be horrified if you proposed being forced to show the same photo ID to vote. Ostensibly because poor(read black) people can't be bothered to find the time to get Government ID once every 5 years. In reality it's because it's much more hassle to get a bunch of fake IDs for your fake voters.
Apparently however he has no such compunction upon banning poor people from purchasing drano.
While we're at it, why don't we have a registry for everything else potentially dangerous at the hardware store, like hammers, bolt cutters, wrenches, paint thinner...? Might as well just log every purchase everyone makes just in case, because I'm sure a tiny fraction of them will be used for something nefarious.godofallu said:This is actually a good law.
1 You don't have to be 18 at the moment to buy drain cleaner, which is an incredibly damaging acid. How stupid is that?
2 Gangs have been known to use it to melt bodies.
So you get a quick ID check, and sign a sheet. Who cares? We have ID checks for alcohol and cigarets too. It is no big deal.
If someone is buying 50 bottles of drain-o frequently, that should be recorded and someone should know about it. The thing is people aren't stupid, they don't buy all 50 at once. They buy a few from one place then drive to the next store over and over. This is then used for making meth and melting human flesh.Nalgas D. Lemur said:While we're at it, why don't we have a registry for everything else potentially dangerous at the hardware store, like hammers, bolt cutters, wrenches, paint thinner...? Might as well just log every purchase everyone makes just in case, because I'm sure a tiny fraction of them will be used for something nefarious.godofallu said:This is actually a good law.
1 You don't have to be 18 at the moment to buy drain cleaner, which is an incredibly damaging acid. How stupid is that?
2 Gangs have been known to use it to melt bodies.
So you get a quick ID check, and sign a sheet. Who cares? We have ID checks for alcohol and cigarets too. It is no big deal.
If someone is buying 50 bottles of Drano frequently, they probably run a plumbing business. If someone is doing something "evil" with caustic chemicals, they can just steal them (or use fake IDs, etc.) instead of getting their names recorded. The vast majority of people who buy and use hammers are carpenters and other people doing construction work, and they still would be even if all gun-related crime were replaced overnight with hammer-related crime.godofallu said:If someone is buying 50 bottles of drain-o frequently, that should be recorded and someone should know about it. The thing is people aren't stupid, they don't buy all 50 at once. They buy a few from one place then drive to the next store over and over. This is then used for making meth and melting human flesh.
If there were giants groups of criminal organizations that beat thousands of people to death with hammers, then I would support a law that made it so the government knows how many hammers you are buying. Kind of like how every place in the world checks gun sales.
All governments have to manage privacy vs need. To compare drain-o to a hammer is idiotic, you can't create meth or destroy evidence or poison people with a hammer.Nalgas D. Lemur said:Snip
Just a quick note for you:Blablahb said:More likely in that case the only victims would be the prospective arsonist's eyebrows you know. ^_^Jedoro said:OT: Wow, great idea, Illinois. Funny how you have to show ID and sign for drain cleaner, yet anyone can buy GASOLINE at a pump and put it in one of those red plastic jugs with no suspicion whatsoever, then find a lighter and burn some shit up.
It occured to me that the only other countries I'm aware of having had such attacks on women, are Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran.Lazier Than Thou said:I don't even have words for this anymore. Thoughts?
They don't [http://www.gop.com/index.php].Blargh McBlargh said:Doesn't the US test their senators for mental retardation before putting them in office? :/
Actually, on second though they definately, totally, completely don't [http://www.constitutionparty.com/].