I just spent the last hour writing a 1500-word paper for my management class. In the grading requirements, it said "cite at least four sources, one of which must be a magazine article and one of which must be a newspaper article, but other sources you are free to choose."
Well, where am I going to find a pile of magazines and newspapers at eight in the morning when I haven't started the paper yet and it's due at 11? Wikipedia, of course! Simply read the article about my topic (the paper was about Lance Armstrong and motivational theory), yank the quote, cite the source, and it ceases to be plagiarism because thanks to web archives, I did read the article! Just found it via the wiki is all. Maybe not ethical, but not against the rules---kind of like Lance Armstrong's alleged steroid use?
Citing a book I haven't read may have been a bit much, but I'd have done that anyway---back in my high school days I'd go to the library, find books on the subjects I had to write papers on, turn to a random page to find a quote out of context, then cite it. This is just a digital-age version.
(also, I make a point to cite at least one REALLY oddball source every time I write a paper. I've cited Cracked, TVTropes, and Zero Punctuation. For today's unorthodox source? I threw in a quote about "the dividing line between a live hero and a dead one is a sharp sword", used it as a metaphor for Lance Armstrong's oncologist, and cited the UESP article on Tun-Zeeus in my works cited page!)
For Discussion: Share your triumphant tales of academic bullshit! Dubious sources, "What, you wanted a citation!" moments, that sort of thing. And did you get away with it? (I once wrote a paper that had 14 TVTropes cites in the references section and got an A on it, including the Crazy Enough to Work trope!)
Well, where am I going to find a pile of magazines and newspapers at eight in the morning when I haven't started the paper yet and it's due at 11? Wikipedia, of course! Simply read the article about my topic (the paper was about Lance Armstrong and motivational theory), yank the quote, cite the source, and it ceases to be plagiarism because thanks to web archives, I did read the article! Just found it via the wiki is all. Maybe not ethical, but not against the rules---kind of like Lance Armstrong's alleged steroid use?
Citing a book I haven't read may have been a bit much, but I'd have done that anyway---back in my high school days I'd go to the library, find books on the subjects I had to write papers on, turn to a random page to find a quote out of context, then cite it. This is just a digital-age version.
(also, I make a point to cite at least one REALLY oddball source every time I write a paper. I've cited Cracked, TVTropes, and Zero Punctuation. For today's unorthodox source? I threw in a quote about "the dividing line between a live hero and a dead one is a sharp sword", used it as a metaphor for Lance Armstrong's oncologist, and cited the UESP article on Tun-Zeeus in my works cited page!)
For Discussion: Share your triumphant tales of academic bullshit! Dubious sources, "What, you wanted a citation!" moments, that sort of thing. And did you get away with it? (I once wrote a paper that had 14 TVTropes cites in the references section and got an A on it, including the Crazy Enough to Work trope!)