Aenir said:
SlainPwner666 said:
Well, I really liked SC1, and I liked the beta of SC2. The question is, I'm more of a single player kinda guy, is there enough content to justify it's purchase?
Personally, I wholeheartedly believe the singleplayer campaign alone is worth the full price. It's just incredible and I love playing through it and hearing the story and messing with all the little things strewn about the Hyperion. It's massive. They did NOT skimp out on the campaign at all.
Cody211282 said:
I'm going to go ahead and do a counter point to this.
The singleplayer felt unfinished, the story is horribly incomplete, and I mean just the Terran part that should have been done(since this is the only game you play as them in). Other then that it's a good game if you liked StarCraft 1.
Felt I should explain myself. I should also mention that I'm more of a, I guess you could call "Macro" player, and I love having nice, long missions where I can play at my own pace, spend hours if I want to creating a nice, big, metaphorical "Fuck you" kind of army, the one that absolutely wipes out everything in it's path. Perhaps get periodically attacked or something, but I despise time limits and I despise escort missions, as well as "Collect these pieces to build this" missions and stealth missions. Attack and Defend missions are simplistic, but that's what I want, and above all, I'm just worried that Blizz might've put in some broken missions to be innovative.
I also worry about hearing a rumor that you have to be connected to battlenet at all times just to play singleplayer, and that has me worried because not only do I travel alot, but when I'm home, my internet is more bipolar then your average teenager.