Hader said:
TheRealCJ said:
Edit: Gee, sorry for stepping on all your little fanboy toes people. I didn't know this was such serious business.
What did you expect? Everyone knows the Pokemon world is absurd and unrealistic, but who gives a shit, it's still fun. Realism or the lack thereof has little to no effect on how fun a game can be.
Absolute bullshit
Pokemon IS the real world, they just dumped a heap of strange creatures and easily entertained children into it. Take a look at any other game/ movie/ story that does the same thing and you will see a major difference. When a new, fictitious concept is put into real life society, certain steps are taken to explain things that wouldn't normally work, or at least they explain the things that matter. I'm sure if pokemon did this it would be a much better game and probably have more people playing, probably from higher age groups.
What if they showed you and explained (simply for the young'uns) how the world works with pokemon? "Hey look, electric type pokemon! Guess what? We use them to power your house and stuff." Electric types could also help with repairing machines such as the ones used to heal pokemon in pokeballs (A machine which should come in a larger size to heal people, and should be kept in the same building.)
Water pokemon being used to hep in surfing lessons, swimming lessons, cleaning jobs firefighting, lifeguards and safety crew on cruise ships or something along those lines.
Grass types being used to attend to plants, work on farms, be misused by environmentalists because they are douchebags. Or so i'm assuming. (scapegoating makes your argument more valid apparently)
Fire types could be used in colder areas of the world for heating purposes, in firefighting if the fire is too strong for water types and they have to backburn,clearing the ice if a boat had to go through icy waters (titanicemon saved) or for any other reason.
Grounds types could be used to dig tunnels for underground piping, wiring and all that sort of thing.
Flying types could help with flying over areas to report damages and other necessary information about power lines and the sort.
Considering the "bad guys" bit, instead of always going to steal pokemon they could rob the stores, disrupt travel and a fair few more things to make profit. After all pokemon are a means, and not the only means, to get the money the "bad guys" want. Sometimes they aren't after profit but still, that's not much of the time.
As for the scientists only doing research on pokemon, it kind of makes sense. If you can achieve a task by simply using their talents then why bother with any fancy technology. However there still should be some scientists working on other things because disease is still a problem, and people are always looking forward to that new pokeball or pokedex. (The story of pokemon still has humans in it and as everyone knows we are consumer whores, and a couple of fucked up little animals won't change that)
Some of these i've stolen from the tv series and some wouldn't work because children are playing these games, but my point still stands. When you alter the real life scenario you are going to create some questions, and if these questions aren't answered it creates holes in your concept. Holes which most ten year olds would probably ignore, but still, it does seem a little lazy.
Then again, if the creators of pokemon weren't lazy they'd have probably moved on from the birds-eye view play... or maybe its just they lack the funds. Or don't want to spend much of their profit.