OldKingClancy said:
There's been more than few threads on this site about 'The worst game you ever played' or 'The worst movie you ever seen' and some of the choices are well deserved to be hated. However in one of the recent movie threads - and this is something I've noticed in a lot of these threads - people are picking decent films and games and claiming them to be the worst ever. Now everyone's entitles to their opinion but really; just as an example in the most recent thread someone said the Lord Of The Rings Trilogy was the worst they ever seen, now sure you may not have liked it but was it really the worst you've ever seen?
My question to you Escapists is 'Are choices like these done by trolls, are they the only thing the commentor can think of at that moment or am I just making too big a deal out of this and people genuially hate these films and games?'
The issue is that people cannot for the life of themselves be objective about how good or bad something is. Yes, people genuinely dislike films such as
The Lord of the Rings and I don't begrudge them that. They're long films with a rather excessive amount of slow, quiet scenes that are a huge contrast to whenever the fight scenes break out. It's also set in the "typical" fantasy setting which is something many people are not fans of.
I'd wager that your second question is a bit valid. Objectively speaking,
The Lord of the Rings is a fantastic bit of cinematography. It's hardly worse than something you'd see on a "SyFy Original Movie" night or a list of Uwe Boll movies. But it's a big-name title that people will find bored them, and it's a lot easier to remember than
In The Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale (case in point, I had to Google that to remember its actual name) so there will be people who say it out of ease and laziness.
There are people who genuinely like bad B-Movies and whatnot, but I'd say that most people haven't actually taken the time to get perspective and actually
watch objectively "bad" movies, so their opinions are colored by whatever last huge budget title they watched that they felt was lacking. Also, a lot of things get blown pretty far out of proportion when it comes to . . . well, anything involving subjectivity, really. I've seen people say that the CGI in the
Transformers films was terrible. Really? I mean, okay, it was a bit of an aesthetic nightmare, but for all of the hammy acting, dolled up token love interests, and terrible writing in those films the CGI was probably the best part. Again, far better than anything you'd see on a late-night "SyFy" movie. I think what hammers it home for most people is when there are parts that are good (good acting/music/directing/CGI/writing) which are then combined with things that are terrible (bad acting/music/directing/CGI/writing) and it becomes more of a disappointment than anything else.
It hits me the same way the hate for
Call of Duty does. Okay, you may not personally like
The Dark Knight, but do you
really think it's objectively
worse than
House of the Dead,
Bloodrayne,
Birdemic, or god-forbid
The Room?