Things that will be Obsolete in the future?

Recommended Videos

mayney93

New member
Aug 3, 2009
719
0
0
Twad said:
Pretty much like today, but with an "i" in front of everything.
ooh, a mac quote, I doubt very much so, as you see mac will go to far and overprice the i-soul, so people will turn to stealing and looting the mac stores, this will lead to the down fall of mac!
 

mayney93

New member
Aug 3, 2009
719
0
0
Dahni said:
Men.

Believe me, scientists can now grow sperm so women won't really need to spend any time around a man to have millions of kids with him.
just one thing, name 10 scientists off the top of your head, are any woman? no , because women mainly study language etc, they aren't interested in science so if they wiped out men then they'd never progress well except from the soft furnishings department ofc

btw thats a conclusion derived from stats not just pulled out of the air
 

Claymorez

Our King
Apr 20, 2009
1,961
0
0
Aby_Z said:
I have a feeling things will be surprisingly similar to how things are now, just maybe a little smaller or intuitive. I mean hey, they thought we'd have jet packs and hover cars by now.
WE do its just not practical for wider market costs
 

Claymorez

Our King
Apr 20, 2009
1,961
0
0
ALL future technological development and how common they are wether they be jet packs or talking houses will depend on if humanity can lick cold fusion or typical fusion because atm u need energy to run these things and its the one thing we are running out of....look on the bright side project crywolf in cambridge switched on last month and 2 months ago the Americans switched on their magnetic plasma fusion generator and seems to have some promising results so who knows.
 

The DSM

New member
Apr 18, 2009
2,066
0
0
Twitter, soon the morons will move to a more idiotic social networking site and it will shrivel up and die.
 

Deleted

New member
Jul 25, 2009
4,054
0
0
the Dept of Science said:
Discovering how to beat death will be a very bad thing. I'd assassinate the scientist before he releases the method even if it costs me my life. Overpopulation is going to make up all live like in that movie "Soylent Green".
 

Dahni

Lemon Meringue Tie
Aug 18, 2009
922
0
0
mayney93 said:
Dahni said:
Men.

Believe me, scientists can now grow sperm so women won't really need to spend any time around a man to have millions of kids with him.
just one thing, name 10 scientists off the top of your head, are any woman? no , because women mainly study language etc, they aren't interested in science so if they wiped out men then they'd never progress well except from the soft furnishings department ofc

btw thats a conclusion derived from stats not just pulled out of the air
excuse me?
there's plenty of scientists who are women. just because you don't hear about them all the time, doesn't mean they don't exist. I know there's more male scientists than female, but that doesn't mean women don't want to be scientists. I can guarantee you that every single solitary experiment, project, discovery, etc that you hear about will have had women scientists working on it. The media only ever seem to publicly commend the men in charge of it, never the people who worked with them.

I plan to be a scientist so don't go making statements like "women aren't interested in science".
fuck sake.
 

Latinidiot

New member
Feb 19, 2009
2,215
0
0
physical proof of music. I guess I'll be one of those that crosses the atlantic to get my hands on 'Ghost Reveries'
 

MiserableOldGit

New member
Apr 1, 2009
553
0
0
Toilet paper, Trial and error medicine, fossil fuels (well, they'll be all used up anyway), and hopefully, any and all reality TV shows.
 

MiserableOldGit

New member
Apr 1, 2009
553
0
0
Dahni said:
Men.

Believe me, scientists can now grow sperm so women won't really need to spend any time around a man to have millions of kids with him.
Sooo, you're going to step in with your size nines and completely bugger an aspect of evolution that has assured the the development of any species with aspirations beyond being a fungus. When you can demonstrate that degree of arrogance I suppose men truly are obsolete...
 

AkJay

New member
Feb 22, 2009
3,555
0
0
People, they are already starting to get obsolete, case in point, those robots that solve Rubik's Cube's and beat people in chess.
 

ItsAChiaotzu

New member
Apr 20, 2009
1,496
0
0
baggyn said:
This thread
But seriously, DVD's Blu-Ray and whatever replaces that
I really hope that woman is holding a chainsaw....


Anyway, disc format, and all the game consoles you play on now. Oh, and the computer you're using.
 

Dahni

Lemon Meringue Tie
Aug 18, 2009
922
0
0
MiserableOldGit said:
Dahni said:
Men.

Believe me, scientists can now grow sperm so women won't really need to spend any time around a man to have millions of kids with him.
Sooo, you're going to step in with your size nines and completely bugger an aspect of evolution that has assured the the development of any species with aspirations beyond being a fungus. When you can demonstrate that degree of arrogance I suppose men truly are obsolete...
I don't agree with it. I think it's fucked up and wrong, and I like the male form too much to replace it with test tube grown sperm. I was simply saying what has happened. If it's allowed to become a widely available procedure, all those feminist women will raise legions of daughters who don't believe that men are at all necessary, literally. Should these sort of women become the majority, that's when men will become obsolete.
 

mayney93

New member
Aug 3, 2009
719
0
0
Dahni said:
mayney93 said:
Dahni said:
Men.

Believe me, scientists can now grow sperm so women won't really need to spend any time around a man to have millions of kids with him.
just one thing, name 10 scientists off the top of your head, are any woman? no , because women mainly study language etc, they aren't interested in science so if they wiped out men then they'd never progress well except from the soft furnishings department ofc

btw thats a conclusion derived from stats not just pulled out of the air
excuse me?
there's plenty of scientists who are women. just because you don't hear about them all the time, doesn't mean they don't exist. I know there's more male scientists than female, but that doesn't mean women don't want to be scientists. I can guarantee you that every single solitary experiment, project, discovery, etc that you hear about will have had women scientists working on it. The media only ever seem to publicly commend the men in charge of it, never the people who worked with them.

I plan to be a scientist so don't go making statements like "women aren't interested in science".
fuck sake.
im just saying that most women aren't interested in science, and those that are, don't rise to the top of the game and become leaders of their field . there is many female scientists just not that many that people know of.
 

lvl9000_woot

New member
Oct 30, 2009
856
0
0
mooseodeath said:
pc's

they're already too broad in scope, purpose built electronics are smaller, cooler, more effective at their tasks and most importantly cheaper. assuming your talking about being an octogenerian , 50 years ago computers were the size of a room and the personal computer was ludicrous.

for me 50 years from now, pc's will be ludicrous again. it'll get all hitchhikers guide five. why make millions of pc's to sell to individual people when you can make ONE computer and sell it millions of times to millions of people.

don't believe me look at what apple's doing. selling purpose built computing devices. the touch focus's on media, the pad on websurfing, the phone on communicating. eventually they'll sell the interface and the computing will be done somewhere they have total control of it's coming and goings. non-conformance simply means you get the pleasure of living as a ludite.
True. But we'd have less privacy....not that we have much nowdays.