Aitruis said:
No, nuclear power works by using radioactive material to heat coolant, which in turn heats water in a closed system, which turns to steam, and the steam drives turbines, which generate electricity.
We do not have a working fission reactor. Last I heard, which was a few years ago, someone was trying to make one, it's the size of a warehouse, and they can only keep it running for about 30 seconds before it fizzles. I have no idea if they've scrapped the project by now, but I hope not.
And what do you think happens to the radioactive material for it to produce heat? There has to be a reaction...
I'll fill you in - you take some uranium or similar fuel, and shoot high-speed neutrons into it. When a neutron collides with an atom's nucleus, it causes the already-unstable nucleus to split, breaking the uranium atom into a thorium atom and... uh... something else, can't remember what the second by-product is. Hence, fission. The split also releases 3 more stray neutrons, which can go on and split other atoms, resulting in a chain reaction. Control of the reaction is achieved by large boron rods, which block, slow or absorb the stray neutrons harmlessly, limiting the amount of splitting atoms and thus the amount of heat produced. In the case of Chernobyl, the reaction was allowed to get too hot, the boron rods melted and collapsed (modern reactors now have them descend from the ceiling instead, so if this happens they fall into the reactor), and the reaction continued unabated, until BOOM.
That's what they told me in A-level physics, anyway.
The gigantic 30-second-wonder (man, that sounds dirty) is a FUSION reactor. Fusion reactors work (or don't, yet) by combining light elements like hydrogen at the nuclear level, forming heavier isotopes and releasing energy. At the moment, the amount of power you need to put into them to make the reaction happen is greater than their output, so they aren't yet viable.