No prob. As a final point though I do need to clarify something because it's easy to misunderstand the point I am trying to make.Lilani said:-snip-
I don't find it difficult to be immersed in movies. I can watch Star Trek, Battlestar Galactica and other sci-fi/supernatural/fanatsy shows and not need to have things always obey the laws of thermodynamics, conservation of energy or Newton's laws of motion. It's just that if you are committing to a decent and logical plot, then the least I expect is some subtle polishing to the movie - that extra bit of attention that shows you thought of everything. Wouldn't it be nice that if for once a car falling off a cliff, didn't explode like a Michal Bay movie?
It's the braking of the pacing and immersion of a good/logical story with nonsensical things that get to me. As with your example in Back to the Future - I really would not need to have seen McFly change the wheels of the Delorean all the time, for the sake of realism..because right from the start I know it's an unrealistic premise so I am fine with it. That said, movies that take itself too seriously or want the audience to connect with the plot and then show a barrel explode thanks to a stray bullet kind of dampens my immersion.
That's the crux of my complaint. I can appreciate the coolness factor but I much prefer a movie where the plot and logic is in sync.