Exactly! But he doesn't exactly wear anything underneath itSpacelord said:Then it'd kinda make sense if he wore 1/4th of a kilt.02cfranklin said:My Scottish mate wears his kilt quite reguarly.. and he's only ¼ Scottish...
But then again you'd get a clear view of his junk. *cringes*
I just want to say in general, even though it relates to this post: Real men don't need to wear underwear.02cfranklin said:Exactly! But he doesn't exactly wear anything underneath itSpacelord said:Then it'd kinda make sense if he wore 1/4th of a kilt.02cfranklin said:My Scottish mate wears his kilt quite reguarly.. and he's only ¼ Scottish...
But then again you'd get a clear view of his junk. *cringes*
By all means try it if you think your going to be able to walk away with it like that. Be sure to let them know your unarmed and all that jazz. They will still haul you off, believe me.CaptainEgypt said:Five to ten minutes before what? Some idiot calls the police and they show up to find that they're accosting someone who is literally just standing there wearing a ski mask, who is undoubtedly unarmed and has no intention of robbing the bank, upon the discovery of which the officers will realize they've just wasted their time?Biek said:Or what the local law enforcement thinks when they see it. Wanna know what I mean? try wearing a ski mask and stand in front of a bank.
I'll give you 5 to 10 minutes.
I could see if I walked into the bank wearing the ski mask, but even then, if I walked in to make a transaction like any other account holder there'd still be nothing anybody could do about it.
I'm 15. It wouldn't work would it, unless I had a scar running underneath hinting that I'm some kind of action movie character.Ziadaine said:Depending on your age and facial looks/hair, I'd say its pull-offableTheGreenManalishi said:Eyepatch for epic coolness
Did you not watch the incridibles?dreadedcandiru99 said:I would totally wear a cape. I still don't see why those went out of style.
Its called the snuggieLord Kofun said:I know this is going to sound terrible, but just think about it for a second. Simply for anatomical reasons, why was it that men wear pants, and women wear dresses? That makes no sense. Men need more room. I genuinely wish, every so often, that it was not so weird for men to wear skirts/dresses. At the very least, I think it should be more normal for men to be able to wear robes like a monk or a wizard. Hmm.. more like a wizard. Before you hate the idea, just think about it for a minute. A little bit of freedom down there goes a long way.
I am a little confused what sounds weird about that sentence. It seems pretty clear to me. By the way, I am from the US.Triple AD said:Okaaaay where do you come from cuz that sentance sounds wierdJumping_Over_Fences said:No pants or shoes!
That would make my life easier. I know I am going in the opposite direction here, but still I don't want to have to wear pants or shoes in public. Mostly shoes, I hate those damn things.
For me gaming t-shirts because they jus' look wierd
Those are redundant. Those are just robes turned around and worn backwards. I have two a snuggie right now, by that definition. A giant, fluffy, old-man snuggie. Nah, I mean some Merlin looking robe. That would be superb.Lazzi said:Its called the snuggieLord Kofun said:I know this is going to sound terrible, but just think about it for a second. Simply for anatomical reasons, why was it that men wear pants, and women wear dresses? ... Hmm.. more like a wizard. Before you hate the idea, just think about it for a minute. A little bit of freedom down there goes a long way.
Because I'm English and the sentance sounds like you wear no underwear and go around with your socks onJumping_Over_Fences said:I am a little confused what sounds weird about that sentence. It seems pretty clear to me. By the way, I am from the US.Triple AD said:Okaaaay where do you come from cuz that sentance sounds wierdJumping_Over_Fences said:No pants or shoes!
That would make my life easier. I know I am going in the opposite direction here, but still I don't want to have to wear pants or shoes in public. Mostly shoes, I hate those damn things.
For me gaming t-shirts because they jus' look wierd
It is really bothering me now. Please tell me what is so weird about my sentence!
I'm familiar with the type. The thing is, even if they could pass as belts, they still count as clothing, for some reason, and I think she wasn't wearing even one of those. Is it still okay, in that case?traceur_ said:I'm guessing you weren't in Australia at the time, length of legwear or lack there of is no surprise to us, here it is common to see pants that could pass as belts.Silver said:On a somewhat related topic, I saw a girl/woman/whatever walking around without pants today. I at least think she was without pants, she wore a t-shirt that went down to about the start of her thighs, and I don't see how something would fit under there. It got me wondering wether that was socially acceptable garb. No one seemed to react, apart from me, who of course immediately started gauging people's reactions, and comparing her clothing to other examples I'd seen during the day, and probably would have started taking notes if I wasn't eating at the time.
Also skirts can look brilliant on guys if they have the right body shape for them.Lord Kofun said:I know this is going to sound terrible, but just think about it for a second. Simply for anatomical reasons, why was it that men wear pants, and women wear dresses? That makes no sense. Men need more room. I genuinely wish, every so often, that it was not so weird for men to wear skirts/dresses. At the very least, I think it should be more normal for men to be able to wear robes like a monk or a wizard. Hmm.. more like a wizard. Before you hate the idea, just think about it for a minute. A little bit of freedom down there goes a long way.