Things you wish were normal to wear in public

Recommended Videos

02cfranklin

New member
Dec 30, 2008
104
0
0
Spacelord said:
02cfranklin said:
My Scottish mate wears his kilt quite reguarly.. and he's only ¼ Scottish...
Then it'd kinda make sense if he wore 1/4th of a kilt.

But then again you'd get a clear view of his junk. *cringes*
Exactly! But he doesn't exactly wear anything underneath it
 

Frizzle

New member
Nov 11, 2008
605
0
0
02cfranklin said:
Spacelord said:
02cfranklin said:
My Scottish mate wears his kilt quite reguarly.. and he's only ¼ Scottish...
Then it'd kinda make sense if he wore 1/4th of a kilt.

But then again you'd get a clear view of his junk. *cringes*
Exactly! But he doesn't exactly wear anything underneath it
I just want to say in general, even though it relates to this post: Real men don't need to wear underwear.
There are 2 occasions where underwear are necessary. one of them is an underwear fashion show. The other, trying to hide certain things in public...
 

Biek

New member
Mar 5, 2008
1,629
0
0
CaptainEgypt said:
Biek said:
Or what the local law enforcement thinks when they see it. Wanna know what I mean? try wearing a ski mask and stand in front of a bank.

I'll give you 5 to 10 minutes.
Five to ten minutes before what? Some idiot calls the police and they show up to find that they're accosting someone who is literally just standing there wearing a ski mask, who is undoubtedly unarmed and has no intention of robbing the bank, upon the discovery of which the officers will realize they've just wasted their time?

I could see if I walked into the bank wearing the ski mask, but even then, if I walked in to make a transaction like any other account holder there'd still be nothing anybody could do about it.
By all means try it if you think your going to be able to walk away with it like that. Be sure to let them know your unarmed and all that jazz. They will still haul you off, believe me.
 

TheGreenManalishi

New member
May 22, 2008
1,363
0
0
Ziadaine said:
TheGreenManalishi said:
Eyepatch for epic coolness
Depending on your age and facial looks/hair, I'd say its pull-offable
I'm 15. It wouldn't work would it, unless I had a scar running underneath hinting that I'm some kind of action movie character.
 

Lazzi

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,013
0
0
The leather Harness and chaps I bought for halloween.

It was for my sick twisted version of the big bad wolf.
 

Lazzi

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,013
0
0
Lord Kofun said:
I know this is going to sound terrible, but just think about it for a second. Simply for anatomical reasons, why was it that men wear pants, and women wear dresses? That makes no sense. Men need more room. I genuinely wish, every so often, that it was not so weird for men to wear skirts/dresses. At the very least, I think it should be more normal for men to be able to wear robes like a monk or a wizard. Hmm.. more like a wizard. Before you hate the idea, just think about it for a minute. A little bit of freedom down there goes a long way.
Its called the snuggie
 

I Am Pigeon

New member
Sep 25, 2008
196
0
0
Probably suits. I do wear mine everywhere but it seems most people think I have to be going somewhere to wear a suit. Maybe I just find them extremely comfortable, do I really have to be going somewhere. Do you have to comment on me wanting to wear my suit while taking my dog for a walk.
 

Jumping_Over_Fences

New member
Apr 15, 2009
978
0
0
Triple AD said:
Jumping_Over_Fences said:
No pants or shoes!

That would make my life easier. I know I am going in the opposite direction here, but still I don't want to have to wear pants or shoes in public. Mostly shoes, I hate those damn things.
Okaaaay where do you come from cuz that sentance sounds wierd

For me gaming t-shirts because they jus' look wierd
I am a little confused what sounds weird about that sentence. It seems pretty clear to me. By the way, I am from the US.

It is really bothering me now. Please tell me what is so weird about my sentence!
 

Sea Age

New member
Mar 22, 2009
66
0
0
As many befory me: A suit. With a shoulder holster, just for looks. That ought to be normal. Oh! Gestapo uniform. Although that is less of a "wish it was normal", and more of a "wish people didn't think I was a nazi" >.> A Gestapo uniform with a cane, and then I'd limp my way around my neighboorhood. Think Herr Flick [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herr_Otto_Flick] from British series 'Allo 'Allo.
 

Lord Kofun

New member
Mar 18, 2009
223
0
0
Lazzi said:
Lord Kofun said:
I know this is going to sound terrible, but just think about it for a second. Simply for anatomical reasons, why was it that men wear pants, and women wear dresses? ... Hmm.. more like a wizard. Before you hate the idea, just think about it for a minute. A little bit of freedom down there goes a long way.
Its called the snuggie
Those are redundant. Those are just robes turned around and worn backwards. I have two a snuggie right now, by that definition. A giant, fluffy, old-man snuggie. Nah, I mean some Merlin looking robe. That would be superb.
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,425
0
0
thongs(for guys). by themself or/and over your pants.......i dunno i just feel that should be acceptable.
 

Triple AD

New member
Apr 1, 2009
311
0
0
Jumping_Over_Fences said:
Triple AD said:
Jumping_Over_Fences said:
No pants or shoes!

That would make my life easier. I know I am going in the opposite direction here, but still I don't want to have to wear pants or shoes in public. Mostly shoes, I hate those damn things.
Okaaaay where do you come from cuz that sentance sounds wierd

For me gaming t-shirts because they jus' look wierd
I am a little confused what sounds weird about that sentence. It seems pretty clear to me. By the way, I am from the US.

It is really bothering me now. Please tell me what is so weird about my sentence!
Because I'm English and the sentance sounds like you wear no underwear and go around with your socks on

P.S. Yes us english can be a bit wierd
 

Silver

New member
Jun 17, 2008
1,142
0
0
traceur_ said:
Silver said:
On a somewhat related topic, I saw a girl/woman/whatever walking around without pants today. I at least think she was without pants, she wore a t-shirt that went down to about the start of her thighs, and I don't see how something would fit under there. It got me wondering wether that was socially acceptable garb. No one seemed to react, apart from me, who of course immediately started gauging people's reactions, and comparing her clothing to other examples I'd seen during the day, and probably would have started taking notes if I wasn't eating at the time.
I'm guessing you weren't in Australia at the time, length of legwear or lack there of is no surprise to us, here it is common to see pants that could pass as belts.
I'm familiar with the type. The thing is, even if they could pass as belts, they still count as clothing, for some reason, and I think she wasn't wearing even one of those. Is it still okay, in that case?
 

Sevre

Old Hands
Apr 6, 2009
4,886
0
0
I wish I can wear my ZP! t-shirt in public,but all my non-nerd friends would stare at me with WTHISTHAT? looks. I'll wear it anyway.
 

Lord George

New member
Aug 25, 2008
2,734
0
0
Lord Kofun said:
I know this is going to sound terrible, but just think about it for a second. Simply for anatomical reasons, why was it that men wear pants, and women wear dresses? That makes no sense. Men need more room. I genuinely wish, every so often, that it was not so weird for men to wear skirts/dresses. At the very least, I think it should be more normal for men to be able to wear robes like a monk or a wizard. Hmm.. more like a wizard. Before you hate the idea, just think about it for a minute. A little bit of freedom down there goes a long way.
Also skirts can look brilliant on guys if they have the right body shape for them. :D