This can't end well; Westboro wing nutts send an open letter to Anonymous

Recommended Videos

newfoundsky

New member
Feb 9, 2010
576
0
0
Novs said:
Well when you have a pretty disorganized grou pof people who come together all across the internet all using the same name, its pretty hard to keep track of who does what. So while some groups of Anon will be about defending rights, others will be about stealing your money, see?
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Novs said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Novs said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Novs said:
maddawg IAJI said:
They attacked several sites for their denial of service to Wikileaks. They protested several governments about their lack of free speech. They fucking hacked a guy's twitter account and stole his private info because he was trying to bring down wikileaks. It isn't one letter, its everything they've been doing for the last year.
Taking Anon seriously. Lulz.

Just because we don't like it doesn't mean it isn't legal. If the government wished to, they could clamp down on the WBC and hinder their protests, but they choose not to. As long as they are within their rights, Anon would be doing what the FBI attempted to do to them.



Doesn't mean they don't have rights given to them. As I said before, the Government could pretty much destroy anything the WBC does if it wanted to by passing some simple legislation that would get by without much trouble, but they choose not to. As long as what they do is legal and is protected by their right to protest and their to speak, Anon shouldn't go anywhere near them.
Oh so you think whatever is legal is fine and right? Even morally?

So you go by whatever is legal is fine, and whatever is illegal is clearly wrong?

You go by with the thought that goverment makes the best descisions?

The law is everything????

This what your post pretty much says to me. Funny how much faith you have in the goverment to do whats right, when they are a bunch of squabbling, greedy cunts. How very naive and clueless.
Then you my friend do not even know what I am talking about. I'm calling Anon hypocritical. They preach free speech, but then plan to turn around and take it from someone else. They hated it when the FBI attacked them after ignoring them for so long, so now they're turning around and doing it to the them. They troll everyone, but now they're getting mad at trolls.

This is a group of people for the last year have been attempting to preach the freedom of speech, but now they're turning around denying those same rights to others. I'll trust a government over a group of criminals who seem to go back on their own beliefs at the drop of a hat.
Dude your taking a message from a large amount of people who dont have a leader, dont have an organisation, and they are just known as people from /b/ a great deal of them are probably children and teenagers, or basement dwellers.. i wouldnt known, but they seem to have lots of time.

Anyways why would you take a bunch of trolls from the internet seriously?? It doesnt matter that their hypocritical, their just trolling and doing it for lulz.

You my friend, missed my first point in the previous post.
Because when those trolls are not only harassing, but bringing down the websites of businesses, hacking social media accounts and committing identity theft, then you take them seriously. They're beyond doing everything for 'the lulz' now. They are seriously starting to have a negative effect on people and in my honest opinion, Anon is just as bad as the WBC.
So you take their idealogy seriously, yet you mention nothing of what they acctually do, until now.

Way to argue bro...

Im not aware they had done identity theft, although im not sure where you get this from, ill agree thats serious.

But it doesnt have any relation to your argument about their idealogy.

Besides its most likely the kids making the statement, and any serious crimes commited would be done by the same people anyway even if they were not part of 4 chan.
Why didn't I mention it? Because its fucking common sense. What do you think happened to Boxxy? And more recently, what do you think happened to Aaron Barr? You shouldn't be arguing on behalf of a group you know nothing about. Don't insult me and my competency when it comes to debating when you're the one ignorant on the subject.

And they don't have anything to do with my subject, you raised it. You asked why I took them seriously and despise them and now after I explained what they do and why I take their actions seriously, you claim that it has nothing to do with the argument. Just read their Wikipedia page. Its filled with numerous actions they did (Along with the immature crap) in the name of free speech and against censorship.

You called me naive, clueless, you've inferred that I cannot debate. Enough of the goddamn Ad Homeniems. You have never touched on my points and about half of both of your posts seem to be devoted to insulting me. Maybe you should step away from the keyboard and learn to have a debate without insulting someone.
 

Thespian

New member
Sep 11, 2010
1,407
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
Come on now, I can't be the only one who finds this situation ironic. A group of people who advocate free speech everywhere is threatening to attack a group of people because they use that right. I don't care how small of a minority they are, they have a right to preach their own thoughts and Anon, of all people, should respect that right.

Its hypocritical and rather silly. Attacking the WBC is like fighting a puppy. There is no point to it and these guys are persistent. Taking down their site is not gonna do anything.
You're right, but since when have Anonymous ever used morals as anything more than a smoking gun, or a banner to rally behind?
Everyone's entitled to free speech but some people abuse it in a hateful way... I hope Anonymous humiliates them. It would be hilarious.
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
Grigori361 said:
Yeah so I wasn't the only one who picked up on the odd language they used then?

It occurred to me, but it makes for damn good discussion anyways.
While I do agree their wording was odd. It is also just something I would do if I wanted to attack anything. Just make it look like I was attacked first.
 

Realitycrash

New member
Dec 12, 2010
2,779
0
0
So what if Anon are hypocritical? Everyone is a hypocrite in the end. WBC just have no idea what they are getting themselves into, and I can't stop laughing.
 

GenericAmerican

New member
Dec 27, 2009
636
0
0
If there is one group of people on the planet that deserve to die a horrible horrible death its the WBC.

Going to soldier's funerals and calling the deceased fags and shit like that? Seriously? These people aren't even Christians, their just pyschos who read the book and hide behind it too justify there actions.

I can't believe they haven't been killed yet. One day they will go protest something, and they will piss the wrong person off...and I will rejoice.

I;m reading there sermons...it's so sad it's funny. The word fag is used alot; shouldn't it be homosexual? These people are pathetic
 

Grigori361

New member
Apr 6, 2009
409
0
0
crudus said:
Grigori361 said:
Yeah so I wasn't the only one who picked up on the odd language they used then?

It occurred to me, but it makes for damn good discussion anyways.
While I do agree their wording was odd. It is also just something I would do if I wanted to attack anything. Just make it look like I was attacked first.
Smart man, or woman. I would too come to think of it.
 

Varitel

New member
Jan 22, 2011
257
0
0
Whatever Anonymous does to their sites, it won't stop them, at least not forever. They will continue to spread hate and ill will. All we can do is ignore the WBC and try, despite the temptation, not to sink down to their level.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
Lukeje said:
Raiyan 1.0 said:
Nuckelavee said:
And for 4chan's reaction, please visit... http://boards.4chan.org/b/res/310728473
Perhaps NSFW.
It's kinda funny how many people on /b/ are just asking everyone to stay quiet or send sarcastic 'surrender' messages so that the attention whores can't garner any more, well, attention.
My favourite was the guy requesting that everyone send texts of `Not your personal army' to Fred Phelps. Simple but effective.
Classy!

As for the rest of the people, assume Anon to be a single entity at your own risk. Here's their <url=http://anonnews.org/index.php?p=press&a=item&i=494&hotlink=true>reply.
 

AgDr_ODST

Cortana's guardian
Oct 22, 2009
9,317
0
0
DarthFennec said:
This is going to be hilarious! Bookmarking godhatesfags.com, so I get to see when they actually hack it ^^
I hope you and everyone here realize that those bastards get paid(dunno how they just do) everytime some one goes to thier site
 

Aerodyamic

New member
Aug 14, 2009
1,205
0
0
brendonnelly said:
Annnnnnd its down!
Still unable to connect to Godhatesfag.com. While the full power of the Internet Hate Machine may not have been aroused and focused against the WBC, apparently the much smaller Internet Hilarity Machine decided it was a starving rat terrier, and the WBC happened to be waving a pork chop a liiiiiiiiiitle too close.

 

DarthFennec

New member
May 27, 2010
1,154
0
0
AgDr_ODST said:
DarthFennec said:
This is going to be hilarious! Bookmarking godhatesfags.com, so I get to see when they actually hack it ^^
I hope you and everyone here realize that those bastards get paid(dunno how they just do) everytime some one goes to thier site
That would require adverts, I don't think there's any on there though, I mean who would want to fund them? Anyway I don't know for sure because the site seems to be down :/