This is just ridiculous, USA

Recommended Videos

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
samaugsch said:
thespyisdead said:
USA, in general, is a weird place... i mean what other country can shrug a debt that big off, and still not feel any consequences, like a lower amount of loans, or not receiving any loans in the first place...
Me neither. I don't understand why China doesn't just stop selling stuff to us until we pay them back.
Lol. Because if they stop selling stuff, they stop needing to make it, and lots of people in china lose their jobs.

Remember, money is less important than food. XD

I think china would much rather have the US owe it money. (Good way to put pressure on someone too, incidentally), than risk the effects it'd have on their own economy to stop selling people stuff.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
I got 99 problems and double-standard cencorship aint one...

ok from my memory I dont remember too much graphic violence...violence yes, but more "dirt/explosions/army" type stuff

but yeah, kind of like violence and sex
 
Aug 1, 2010
2,768
0
0
Remember, horrific, deplorable violence is OK, as long as you don't say any naughty words!
-Sheila Broflovski

Believe me OP, we are WELL aware of the stupidity...
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Censorship makes no sense in general to me, it caters to a very small minority and effects a large mass of people who don't mind seeing things.
 

Astoria

New member
Oct 25, 2010
1,887
0
0
Well, as Sheila Broflovski said in the South Park movie, "Just remember what the MPAA says: Horrific, deplorable violence is okay, as long as people don't say any naughty words!" It's stupid because swear words could be seen as a verbal form of violence but if people wanna be stupid about things then let them. They can't sensor real life right? Right....?
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
Yeah it is funny that way. By funny I mean weird. Just Dance 2 has some weird censorship in it too (it censors the word "junk" but not a swear word). I think it is a spur of the putting our kids in plastic bubbles thing.

samaugsch said:
Me neither. I don't understand why China doesn't just stop selling stuff to us until we pay them back.
Because it would make China's economy collapse?
 

FPSfanatic

New member
Sep 21, 2011
4,772
0
0
I just looked up the trailer and they never actually SHOW a guy getting shot. They show a lot of people running around, tanks shooting, jets fighting, helicopters shooting, but you see no dead bodies. So technically, no dying.
 

Torrasque

New member
Aug 6, 2010
3,441
0
0
teqrevisited said:
Horrific, deplorable violence is okay as long as people don't say any naughty words.

The truth about censorship from none other than the South Park movie.
<youtube=xn5ysfcyIsM&feature=related>
Ahhh, how I love South Park for this one clip. Makes me so happy to be Canadian :D

OP: Its like when the Canadian Broadcasting Association decided that a song from the 80s (can't recall what) is horrifically insensitive because it says "******" once in the song. I've listened to the song many times, and still can't hear it =/
The people that decide what is censored and what is not, are usually really fucking
 

Johnson McGee

New member
Nov 16, 2009
516
0
0
I just don't understand why they would use a song where they have to censor pretty much every line while leaving very obvious gaps in the lyrics in their ad.
 

Krantos

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,840
0
0
Um, Cultural differences?

Seriously, why is that so hard for people to understand? Do I agree with it? No, but I do understand why it's there. That's just the culture people live in.

If you curious, check out the rating systems in countries in the middle east. They're TOTALLY different from the ratings in the US or Europe (focus on things like individualistic mores, etc.).

There are things you can say and do on (most) European TV that you can't get away with in the US, while the reverse is also true. A great example was a Whose Line episode (US) where one of the UK regulars (Josie, iirc) guest-starred, and her jokes kept getting censored, because she didn't know what she was saying wasn't allowed on US TV.

Really and honestly, stop a second and ask yourself if what you're complaining about is a valid concern or just the result of different cultural norms.
 

jojoemon

New member
May 20, 2008
186
0
0
Original poster, I can guarantee that, in whatever the song happened to be, the word "*****" was not used to mean "Dog of a female persuasion". It was being used as a derogatory way to refer to a woman. I mean, we all already knew that, but seriously it had to be said. The word "*****" may not be as bad as stuff like "****", "******", "******", or what have you, but its employment is still causing someone to be demeaned. Terry Pratchett once wrote that sin is when you treat people as things. In a small way, that is what is being done when you use the word "*****" to describe a woman or, really, any person. It's not that nice of a word.
The graphic violence probably wasn't that nice either. Still I don't think the problem here should be that they censored a word and not extreme violence, thus rendering them (whoever did the censoring) hypocrites. The game is a violent game, they can't advertise it accurately without showing violence. It should have been advertised in a place where censorship would not be an issue because the intended audience would have been mature enough to handle any exposure to violence or swears. I guess this didn't happen, as the word "*****" in the commercial was, apparently, censored. They could have censored the entire commercial, but a giant black bar on the screen for 20 or so seconds probably would increase game sales. Whatever.
I'm tired, this rant is over, I didn't really make a point, so here it is: Blame the the people who did the commercial for greed, or idiocy, or hypocrisy, any one will do. At the same time, know this; "*****" is a bad thing to call a person.
 

mcnally86

New member
Apr 23, 2008
425
0
0
Exerzet said:
Was watching a movie-trailer over on youtube, and a trailer for battlefield 3 came on. A trailer that featured graphic violence against fellow human beings, explosions and all around war. The soundtrack however, was what was "obviously" the danger to children's sensitive minds, not the violence, as the word ***** (Dog of a female persuasion) was sensored out of the text.

Which leads me to ask, what the hell is up with the american censorship board? If a game is featuring an abundance of violence and has an R or atleast 16+ rating, then I think it's safe to let the watchers hear the perfectly normal word of "*****". What do the rest of you think?
I think you are mistaken. People are complaining because they are using the absolute worst version of that song. Its like B3 is taking a dump in my ears. Children are too young to stand that it may damage their hearing.
 

CrimsonBlaze

New member
Aug 29, 2011
2,252
0
0
Yeah it's pretty f*** up. I believe it is a matter of context rather than content. The word ***** or ass are not always censored in general media, but if it refers to someone or something in particular (on the verge of being insensitive or vulgar), it is often times censored.

In any case, it's more of a "the kids may be watching" scenario than a "some people might be offended by this" scenario. People just need to grow up; they are promoting a game about war, not an after school special.
 

La Barata

New member
Apr 13, 2010
383
0
0
I find it weirder that they actually decided it was a good idea to put a song with an obviously would be censored swear as its primary lyric AS THEIR COMMERCIAL THEME.