(Yes, I predict that this topic won't go downhill at any point...Oh boy.
Also, I'm sometimes bad with words, so if any part of the below upsets you or pisses you off, I'm sorry and I didn't mean to. I invite to discussions and debates, not shitstorms,so please, please be civil.)
Ah, whatever...I have a feeling I'm going to end up regretting making this thread. But I just feel like I want to say this. Besides, if you don't do something you'll regret sometimes, things get a bit boring, right?
Recently, I watched an episode of a Let's Play Versus (You can say whatever you want about Let's Plays, but I love watching them) where two guys play Ty The Tasmanian Tiger against each other. The topic of getting offended came up, and both guys had a discussion that kinda boiled down to "People should stop being so easily offended".
This got me thinking about the nature of getting offended, or whatever you can call it. I'll try to seem as unbiased as possible,because I'm boring like that as I find both sides being right and wrong, depending on the area of discussion. If I, at any point in my rambling, seem biased, it isn't my intention.
Also, bear with me here, because it's going to be a looong one.
See, I agree that some people really should get a thicker skin and that nothing is sacred, but also that there's a time and place for everything, yadda yadda yadda, I'm sure most of you agree with that. We've talked about this. You're a swell bunch.
However, sometimes, there's a certain..."defensiveness" going on that confuses me a little. That some people get offended by other people getting offended by something they said. I think most people brush the offended people off, because honestly, some people are extremely vocal and rude about what they get offended by. But some people take these comments and launch into a small rant about that they should get to joke about anything they want and people shouldn't complain about it.
If the above part didn't make any sense, what I'm trying to say is: I don't understand the "The Complainer Is Always Wrong" mentality. I believe that some complaints are perfectly valid, and they should sometimes (NOTE THAT I SAID SOMETIMES; NOT ALWAYS) be taken into some consideration. Of course this is close to impossible on the Internet, because there's always going to be someone getting offended by something, but maybe just a "I mean no harm with what I said, please don't take it personally, but my jokes with always offend someone and I can't please everybody" should be enough. Sometimes, (AGAIN, SOMETIMES) you can apologize, and you don't need to respond so..."defensively". Though I believe that it's sometimes best to not say anything at all.
For an example, let's bring up a "controversy" that everyone would prefer to forget about but I'll bring up anyway for the sake of discussion, and that I hope we will be civil about in the comments: The JonTron "Retarded" Controversy.
(Let me start by saying this: I like JonTron. I love his videos, I think he's funny and quite talented. I simply don't think that he's the bastion of comedy that people think he is)
See, what most people got upset about from what I gathered wasn't the fact that Jon used "retarded" to describe a feature on the PS4. (Or was it the controls? I don't remember) Some people did, I'm sure, because like I said, everybody gets offended by something. No, from what I understand, people got mad when Jon responded, rather childishly, to a person who mainly just wanted to give him a polite heads-up that some people would take offense to the word being used. At least, it seemed that way to me.
Now, should Jon have apologized for using the word? To the person who first brought it up? No, I don't think so.
Should he have apologized for insulting him afterwards, though? Well...yeah. Nothing major, just a "Sorry, but I deal with this all the time and it's quite tiresome". Nothing more.
So what do I think he should've done? Nothing. I don't feel that he had anything to apologize for at the start, but the response he gave didn't really paint him in a positive light. The best course of action, I feel, was that he should've said nothing.
"But he's an Internet Comedian, it was probably a joke!" I've heard some people say. Yes, probably. Jon isn't exactly known for being wholesome and squeaky clean. But it just came off as childish.
With that said, the shitstorm afterwards was dumb, dumb, dumb. Yes, what Jon said was tactless, and I don't think being a comedian excuses his response, but I feel that he really didn't deserve the outrage that ensued.
Here's something important to consider: Just because you don't find something offensive doesn't mean that others don't either, and there are sometimes reasonable explanations for this and the arguments aren't always invalid.
I once saw an edited picture of a doujinshi panel where the text bubble said: "MY OPINION IS THE ONLY CORRECT ONE! SHUT UP!". Some terribly witty person commented "SJW in a nutshell". Thing is, though, I've also seen this reaction from people who think that others should stop getting offended. I don't know, seems a bit...what's the word? "Hypocritical" is a bit too strong, so it doesn't fit...
(Personally, I think that the edit describes every side of every argument that has ever existed.)
Ah, I seemed a bit biased there, didn't I? Well, let's talk about the flipside, which is also important to consider: Just because you're offended doesn't mean you're right, and it certainly doesn't mean that you have to be rude to and insulting the person who offended you.
From what I gather, most of the complaints I've seen about people getting offended stem from people who get irritated by the offended person getting offended on behalf of someone else. For example, a white American girl who gets offended that someone made a joke about slavery in Africa.
Here's the thing, though: People rarely, if ever, can help just what they get offended by. Maybe it's something they've been brought up to take offense to, maybe they get their opinions from their friends, etc. The reasons are endless. I don't think most people want to get offended.
Most people, that is. What I do think is that some people do want to get offended and will actively seek out topics that rile them up for the sake of having an argument. Why? Maybe they just like arguing. Maybe they feel that they're right because they are offended, as some weird way to feel validated. Maybe they aren't offended at all and just feel like starting a shitstorm for the sake of starting a shitstorm. I don't know, the reasons here are also many.
Now that would be one thing if they just did that. But some people also choose to be rude while talking about that offends them.
Remember what I said about a response being tactless? Well, offended people can also be rather tactless. You know how you can tell someone you're offended?
What could the person have done? Nothing. Don't like the blog? Just leave. Nobody is forcing you to read it, and you don't command any respect through being rude and telling people that they should die just because they said "Merry Christmas". Or maybe it's just a troll. That's a possibility also.
(Not to mention, I bet someone else would've been angry about the use of "Happy Holidays" due to it being too politically correct or something. Because that's also a thing that pisses people off, apparently)
So what did I try to say in all of this? Well, what it all boils down to is that some people need a bit more tact. Can we settle for that? Try to not be tactless. Does that work?
NOTE: Everything stated above is just my opinion. You are free to disagree and tell me if I simply misunderstood something.
Oh, yeah, we need to have a discussion.
Thoughts on my thoughts? Where do you feel the line between "reasonable" and "In desperate need of a thicker skin" goes?
(Also, play a drinking game: Take a shot every time I use "sometimes" and "some" in this post. Or don't. You would probably die)
Also, I'm sometimes bad with words, so if any part of the below upsets you or pisses you off, I'm sorry and I didn't mean to. I invite to discussions and debates, not shitstorms,so please, please be civil.)
Ah, whatever...I have a feeling I'm going to end up regretting making this thread. But I just feel like I want to say this. Besides, if you don't do something you'll regret sometimes, things get a bit boring, right?
Recently, I watched an episode of a Let's Play Versus (You can say whatever you want about Let's Plays, but I love watching them) where two guys play Ty The Tasmanian Tiger against each other. The topic of getting offended came up, and both guys had a discussion that kinda boiled down to "People should stop being so easily offended".
This got me thinking about the nature of getting offended, or whatever you can call it. I'll try to seem as unbiased as possible,
Also, bear with me here, because it's going to be a looong one.
See, I agree that some people really should get a thicker skin and that nothing is sacred, but also that there's a time and place for everything, yadda yadda yadda, I'm sure most of you agree with that. We've talked about this. You're a swell bunch.
However, sometimes, there's a certain..."defensiveness" going on that confuses me a little. That some people get offended by other people getting offended by something they said. I think most people brush the offended people off, because honestly, some people are extremely vocal and rude about what they get offended by. But some people take these comments and launch into a small rant about that they should get to joke about anything they want and people shouldn't complain about it.
If the above part didn't make any sense, what I'm trying to say is: I don't understand the "The Complainer Is Always Wrong" mentality. I believe that some complaints are perfectly valid, and they should sometimes (NOTE THAT I SAID SOMETIMES; NOT ALWAYS) be taken into some consideration. Of course this is close to impossible on the Internet, because there's always going to be someone getting offended by something, but maybe just a "I mean no harm with what I said, please don't take it personally, but my jokes with always offend someone and I can't please everybody" should be enough. Sometimes, (AGAIN, SOMETIMES) you can apologize, and you don't need to respond so..."defensively". Though I believe that it's sometimes best to not say anything at all.
For an example, let's bring up a "controversy" that everyone would prefer to forget about but I'll bring up anyway for the sake of discussion, and that I hope we will be civil about in the comments: The JonTron "Retarded" Controversy.
(Let me start by saying this: I like JonTron. I love his videos, I think he's funny and quite talented. I simply don't think that he's the bastion of comedy that people think he is)
See, what most people got upset about from what I gathered wasn't the fact that Jon used "retarded" to describe a feature on the PS4. (Or was it the controls? I don't remember) Some people did, I'm sure, because like I said, everybody gets offended by something. No, from what I understand, people got mad when Jon responded, rather childishly, to a person who mainly just wanted to give him a polite heads-up that some people would take offense to the word being used. At least, it seemed that way to me.
Now, should Jon have apologized for using the word? To the person who first brought it up? No, I don't think so.
Should he have apologized for insulting him afterwards, though? Well...yeah. Nothing major, just a "Sorry, but I deal with this all the time and it's quite tiresome". Nothing more.
So what do I think he should've done? Nothing. I don't feel that he had anything to apologize for at the start, but the response he gave didn't really paint him in a positive light. The best course of action, I feel, was that he should've said nothing.
"But he's an Internet Comedian, it was probably a joke!" I've heard some people say. Yes, probably. Jon isn't exactly known for being wholesome and squeaky clean. But it just came off as childish.
With that said, the shitstorm afterwards was dumb, dumb, dumb. Yes, what Jon said was tactless, and I don't think being a comedian excuses his response, but I feel that he really didn't deserve the outrage that ensued.
Here's something important to consider: Just because you don't find something offensive doesn't mean that others don't either, and there are sometimes reasonable explanations for this and the arguments aren't always invalid.
I once saw an edited picture of a doujinshi panel where the text bubble said: "MY OPINION IS THE ONLY CORRECT ONE! SHUT UP!". Some terribly witty person commented "SJW in a nutshell". Thing is, though, I've also seen this reaction from people who think that others should stop getting offended. I don't know, seems a bit...what's the word? "Hypocritical" is a bit too strong, so it doesn't fit...
(Personally, I think that the edit describes every side of every argument that has ever existed.)
Ah, I seemed a bit biased there, didn't I? Well, let's talk about the flipside, which is also important to consider: Just because you're offended doesn't mean you're right, and it certainly doesn't mean that you have to be rude to and insulting the person who offended you.
From what I gather, most of the complaints I've seen about people getting offended stem from people who get irritated by the offended person getting offended on behalf of someone else. For example, a white American girl who gets offended that someone made a joke about slavery in Africa.
Here's the thing, though: People rarely, if ever, can help just what they get offended by. Maybe it's something they've been brought up to take offense to, maybe they get their opinions from their friends, etc. The reasons are endless. I don't think most people want to get offended.
Most people, that is. What I do think is that some people do want to get offended and will actively seek out topics that rile them up for the sake of having an argument. Why? Maybe they just like arguing. Maybe they feel that they're right because they are offended, as some weird way to feel validated. Maybe they aren't offended at all and just feel like starting a shitstorm for the sake of starting a shitstorm. I don't know, the reasons here are also many.
Now that would be one thing if they just did that. But some people also choose to be rude while talking about that offends them.
Remember what I said about a response being tactless? Well, offended people can also be rather tactless. You know how you can tell someone you're offended?

(Not to mention, I bet someone else would've been angry about the use of "Happy Holidays" due to it being too politically correct or something. Because that's also a thing that pisses people off, apparently)

So what did I try to say in all of this? Well, what it all boils down to is that some people need a bit more tact. Can we settle for that? Try to not be tactless. Does that work?
NOTE: Everything stated above is just my opinion. You are free to disagree and tell me if I simply misunderstood something.
Oh, yeah, we need to have a discussion.
Thoughts on my thoughts? Where do you feel the line between "reasonable" and "In desperate need of a thicker skin" goes?
(Also, play a drinking game: Take a shot every time I use "sometimes" and "some" in this post. Or don't. You would probably die)
