Something that I have been musing on lately is the education system that we are all put through. This will be from a Canadian perspective, but I'm going to assume you guys have similar problems, so tag along.
I remember back in my last year of highschool I was taking a class on advanced functions (math). At one point in the year there was a test that I didn't feel like studying for, and as such I got a 48%, a failing grade. That was entirely my fault and I felt like an idiot.
A week later a friend returned from a trip overseas and wanted help catching up. At this point I had learned the material on the test that I hadn't known then and I taught it to him. He passes the test with a 78%, based entirely on the knowledge that I had given him. I was happy for him, as he is a good friend.
Something bothered me though. I knew the material. What should stop me from taking the test again and demonstrating my knowledge. I could not, though. Whenever someone looked at my records is would plainly say "He does not know how to graph inverse quadratics", even though I was perfectly capable of graphing them, contrary to what was said in the records.
Basically what I am getting at is: Should student's marks be in a constant state of flux, with assignments able to be resubmitted at any time to try and adjust your marks at any time? Obviously there would be restraints on this, like your resubmitted assignment being put to the bottom of a pile of all other assignments to be marked, and all assignments having to be in by a certain point so that teachers can prepare for exams.
There would be an obvious trade off though, you gain a more complete picture of what a student can do, but you lost the picture of what a student can do under pressure.
Thoughts? You can post your own ideas on school systems as well.
I remember back in my last year of highschool I was taking a class on advanced functions (math). At one point in the year there was a test that I didn't feel like studying for, and as such I got a 48%, a failing grade. That was entirely my fault and I felt like an idiot.
A week later a friend returned from a trip overseas and wanted help catching up. At this point I had learned the material on the test that I hadn't known then and I taught it to him. He passes the test with a 78%, based entirely on the knowledge that I had given him. I was happy for him, as he is a good friend.
Something bothered me though. I knew the material. What should stop me from taking the test again and demonstrating my knowledge. I could not, though. Whenever someone looked at my records is would plainly say "He does not know how to graph inverse quadratics", even though I was perfectly capable of graphing them, contrary to what was said in the records.
Basically what I am getting at is: Should student's marks be in a constant state of flux, with assignments able to be resubmitted at any time to try and adjust your marks at any time? Obviously there would be restraints on this, like your resubmitted assignment being put to the bottom of a pile of all other assignments to be marked, and all assignments having to be in by a certain point so that teachers can prepare for exams.
There would be an obvious trade off though, you gain a more complete picture of what a student can do, but you lost the picture of what a student can do under pressure.
Thoughts? You can post your own ideas on school systems as well.