Tim Langdell Loses IGDA Membership

Recommended Videos

VulakAerr

New member
Mar 31, 2010
512
0
0
I must say, even if he weren't such an arsehole, he does have an EXTREMELY punchable face.
 

Delusibeta

Reachin' out...
Mar 7, 2010
2,594
0
0
About 18 months too late for my tastes. The IGDA has been discredited by this fiasco.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0

Don't let the door hit your fat arse on the way out.

Ahlycks said:
why is everyone so happy that some random game dev lost his job?

whats the story behind this? i tried reading the others and my head exploded. some big business language that made me cry.
Basically, Langdell owns a game that is built on his trademark of the word "Edge".

Through the labyrinthine mess of the trademarks, this means he can sue anyone using the word "Edge" anywhere in their game - but he MUST sue everyone, or he loses that claim.

All he had to do to keep it was to start making another game - and claim that their game might be mistaken as his, but he just kept suing.

Then he took on EA, and they stomped his testes through the floor.

This is why we cheer on this day.
 

SinisterGehe

New member
May 19, 2009
1,456
0
0
SimuLord said:
The Rogue Wolf said:
Couldn't have happened to a nicer douchebag failpony assmunch jackass douchenozzle asswipe I really don't like Tim Langdell.
You forgot fucknugget, shit-for-brains, dickwad, and boil on the ass of society.
I'd say he was more of a hemorrhoid than a boil. You just drain the boil and it heal, hemorrhoids in the other hand...
(Did I spell it correctly?)
 

Spygon

New member
May 16, 2009
1,105
0
0
This is a good sign that the industry still has integrity and know when someone is in the wrong.

Also going up against EA how did he think it was going to turn out and thought the vote would go his way more like jumping before you are pushed.
 

CD-R

New member
Mar 1, 2009
1,355
0
0
RelexCryo said:
mk-1601 said:
This would be the Tim Langdell whose business practices The Escapist inexplicably defended in an article that Russ Pitts refused to retract? That Tim Langdell?

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/op-ed/6401-Edge-or-Edgy-The-Clash-of-Two-Game-Makers-Update
Andy Chalk wrote that. Russ Pitts could delete it, but he can't really retract a statement he didn't make. Only Andy Chalk could retract that article, since he is the author.

Russ Pitts sent an email requesting information, and forwarded that information to Andy Chalk. He didn't actually write the article.
Besides we have the awesome original article by Shamus Young plus his funny Stolen Pixels comics making fun of Langdall, which I can't be bothered to look up right now, to balance it out.
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
Oh, this just keeps getting better and better.

Ahlycks said:
Andy Chalk said:
why is everyone so happy that some random game dev lost his job?

whats the story behind this? i tried reading the others and my head exploded. some big business language that made me cry.
He's a trademark troll, to put it in the simplest terms. The way I understand it, he claim that since his company was named "Edge", he had domain over pretty much anything with "Edge" in the name.
 

GloatingSwine

New member
Nov 10, 2007
4,544
0
0
Ahlycks said:
why is everyone so happy that some random game dev lost his job?
He's not a game developer, by virtue of never actually having developed a game. Oh, sure he's listed products which his company allegedly made, but none of them have ever actually existed.

What he is is a fraudster and con artist, with whom the USPTO will hopefully soon be having Words about the fraudulent filings he made to them on which much of his subsequent fraud has been based.
 

Andy Chalk

One Flag, One Fleet, One Cat
Nov 12, 2002
45,698
1
0
Ahlycks said:
whats the story behind this? i tried reading the others and my head exploded. some big business language that made me cry.
It's a bit tough to explain if "big business language" makes your head pop, but basically it goes like this: Langdell, through his company Edge Games, trademarked the word "edge" and several related phrases, like "gamer's edge," etc. And he has spent the last, oh, couple of decades or so licensing his trademark to anyone even tangentially related to the game industry who wanted to use it - Edge Magazine, Edge PCs, you name it.

Most companies went along with it because it's usually cheaper to just pony up than to pay the costs associated with a protracted legal battle. But a couple years ago, Langdell went after an independent French studio called Mobigame, which had developed a popular iPhone game called Edge. (Edge by Mobigame if you want to look for it.) Instead of capitulating, Mobigame fought back. The Mobigame fight brought the Langdell/Edge nonsense to the attention of the general public, as least as it relates to gamers. It was, as they say, the beginning of the end.

While that was raging on, EA released Mirror's Edge, leading to threats from Langdell, but perhaps inspired by the groundswell of opinion against him, EA met him head on. They went to court (in an action ironically filed by Langdell) and he was crushed.

The obvious glee people are taking in his defeat is the result of his years of bad behaviour, bending over everyone he could while he himself actually produced nothing. You've probably noticed several comments in this thread about how Langdell actually doesn't make games, and although I believe he did back in the C-64 era, there really hasn't been anything since. That was a big part of his courtroom downfall: His claim that Edge Games is actively making games is bullshit.

The courts essentially confirmed what the game industry realized long ago: That Langdell was one of the most egregious trademark trolls in the history of the business. Now he's paying for it.

(All of the above is "top of my head" stuff, btw, so feel free to correct/fill in the blanks as required.)