Time moves in one direction, is measurable, and can be altered around points of gravity. Yes, it exists.
No, time is natural. How we measure it is manmade.XHolySmokesX said:Time is a man made concept, it is not a natural phenomenon.
I think this guy is making an existential argument, rather than a physics one.crudus said:By the logic in the first paragraph we could do the same thing with a meter stick. I could get a longer/shorter piece of wood and call it a meter. It really doesn't do anything for me though. What you did what change the way to measure something, not the something itself. It really doesn't change anything. The same amount of time will still pass and the same speed. If you want to change time just go really, really fast or go near something truly massive.XHolySmokesX said:Time is a man made concept, it is not a natural phenomenon. Time was created to allow us to have a grasp of how long something will take to complete, how long ago an event happened or how long it will be until an events happenes. Time is something that can be very easily changed, if i wanted to change the number of hours in a day to 10 and change how long a minute was, with the right knowledge of how a clock worked, i could do it.
...
Our conscept of time revolves around the length of time it takes for our planet to do a full rotation, and the length of time it takes to orbit our sun once. This would be different for every other planet in the universe, including those in our solar system.
*slow clap*TimeLord said:People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff.
Time is arbitrary, duration and entropy are not.XHolySmokesX said:A couple of months ago i was watching a documentary on time travel and i couldn't help but dissagree with the theories being talked about, but it got me to thinking about time and the nature of it.
Now this might be quite a farfetched concept to a lot of you as i can't imagine you have seen many theories that say time isn't real, so bare with me and ill try explain this the best i can.
Time is a man made concept, it is not a natural phenomenon. Time was created to allow us to have a grasp of how long something will take to complete, how long ago an event happened or how long it will be until an events happenes. Time is something that can be very easily changed, if i wanted to change the number of hours in a day to 10 and change how long a minute was, with the right knowledge of how a clock worked, i could do it.
My personal opinion is that, as far as the past, the future and the possibility of time travel go, time doesn't exist. There is no past and future, everything that happened happened in the prescent as the precent is the evolution of everything that used to be.
Our conscept of time revolves around the length of time it takes for our planet to do a full rotation, and the length of time it takes to orbit our sun once. This would be different for every other planet in the universe, including those in our solar system.
So that's roughly what i think of the concept of time. I want to know what you guys think about time and whether you agree of dissagree with my idea to whatever extent.
Wait, yes we measure time. Our clocks, our perception. Both are influenced by time and measure them- maybe not very accurately, and it's subjected a lot of wibbly-wobbly time perspective stuff, but it's measured.James Joseph Emerald said:I think this guy is making an existential argument, rather than a physics one.crudus said:By the logic in the first paragraph we could do the same thing with a meter stick. I could get a longer/shorter piece of wood and call it a meter. It really doesn't do anything for me though. What you did what change the way to measure something, not the something itself. It really doesn't change anything. The same amount of time will still pass and the same speed. If you want to change time just go really, really fast or go near something truly massive.XHolySmokesX said:Time is a man made concept, it is not a natural phenomenon. Time was created to allow us to have a grasp of how long something will take to complete, how long ago an event happened or how long it will be until an events happenes. Time is something that can be very easily changed, if i wanted to change the number of hours in a day to 10 and change how long a minute was, with the right knowledge of how a clock worked, i could do it.
...
Our conscept of time revolves around the length of time it takes for our planet to do a full rotation, and the length of time it takes to orbit our sun once. This would be different for every other planet in the universe, including those in our solar system.
Like, if nobody measures time, can it really exist? It's the old "tree falling in the woods" thing.
It's not something you can really use logic to refute, because it's challenging the entire foundation upon which logical thought is based.
Have any proof to offer? Or is that conjecture?King Toasty said:Time moves in one direction, is measurable, and can be altered around points of gravity. Yes, it exists.
Er, right. But the point is, if time wasn't measured, would it exist? Just like, if a tree falls in the woods, and nobody hears it, did it make a sound? Scientifically, you can say "yes, of course. Kinetic energy from the tree falling would convert into sound waves, regardless of whether there's anyone around to have their eardrums vibrated by it", but you can't ever be 100% totally positively sure the unobserved world really exists.King Toasty said:Wait, yes we measure time. Our clocks, our perception. Both are influenced by time and measure them- maybe not very accurately, and it's subjected a lot of wibbly-wobbly time perspective stuff, but it's measured.James Joseph Emerald said:I think this guy is making an existential argument, rather than a physics one.crudus said:By the logic in the first paragraph we could do the same thing with a meter stick. I could get a longer/shorter piece of wood and call it a meter. It really doesn't do anything for me though. What you did what change the way to measure something, not the something itself. It really doesn't change anything. The same amount of time will still pass and the same speed. If you want to change time just go really, really fast or go near something truly massive.XHolySmokesX said:Time is a man made concept, it is not a natural phenomenon. Time was created to allow us to have a grasp of how long something will take to complete, how long ago an event happened or how long it will be until an events happenes. Time is something that can be very easily changed, if i wanted to change the number of hours in a day to 10 and change how long a minute was, with the right knowledge of how a clock worked, i could do it.
...
Our conscept of time revolves around the length of time it takes for our planet to do a full rotation, and the length of time it takes to orbit our sun once. This would be different for every other planet in the universe, including those in our solar system.
Like, if nobody measures time, can it really exist? It's the old "tree falling in the woods" thing.
It's not something you can really use logic to refute, because it's challenging the entire foundation upon which logical thought is based.
I'm glad someone quoted it before I did.TimeLord said:People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff.
We know that time moves in one direction, (at least not on the quantum-mindfuckery level) because we see that atoms decay in one way- downwards. They degrade, always, all the time, instead of every getting stronger (or the reverse of decay). If we ever saw an atom that reverse-decayed, our notion of time would be challenged. But we haven't; we've only seen them get weaker.Snowy Rainbow said:Have any proof to offer? Or is that conjecture?King Toasty said:Time moves in one direction, is measurable, and can be altered around points of gravity. Yes, it exists.
But that's our idea of time -- that progression is a forward moving force. If time exists outside our need for it, how do you know decay is not caused by time moving sideways? How do you know time moves at all? Or even within our understanding of direction? Perhaps the entire concept of time being movement is wrong.King Toasty said:We know that time moves in one direction, (at least not on the quantum-mindfuckery level) because we see that atoms decay in one way- downwards. They degrade, always, all the time, instead of every getting stronger (or the reverse of decay).
1. Introduction
2. Time as Ideology
3. Time as Methodology
4. Time as Surrogate Religion
5. Time as Imperialism
6. Reintroduction
7. Time as Abjection
8. Time as Automation
9. Time as Commodity
10. Time as Resistance
Let loose the clockwork dogs
Pathological believers, faithful servants
Reduced to servomechanisms with lock-step discipline and knee-jerk obedience
Reduced to time-reckoners with Newtonian mechanics and a Promethean mandate
Polishing and decorating each ideological cage
Notch by notch, hammer by hammer, escape from freedom
Prognosis: ideologies are habits of thought that defy thought and enable people to avoid thought
Airborne contagions, communicable plagues, towing the weary down river like rudderless wrecks And we are all sick with them.
Hell-bent on standardization
On Cartesian deliverance
Time is the primary socializing tool
Indelibly imprinted and structurally biased
We are domesticated creatures of technical abstraction
If reductionism is our religion, then time keeping is our benediction
Reified and ratified in fixed ideas and solid state circuitry
This baptism took place on the hinges of history
By the faithful who made repression a cardinal requisite
By the faithful who made the timepiece as holy as the cross
Hell-bent on standardization
The wheel keeps turning and we all turn with it.
Um... wtf?XHolySmokesX said:*snip*