So here goes: You invent a time-machine (watch/belt/phone booth, whatever). You travel exactly one day into the future and rob a bank of $2000.
You then return to the present day with your money, and invest it in the SAME bank. Now, since you already have $2000 in your account, you no longer have a need to rob a bank for cash. Therefore, will your robbery of the bank still occur?
So how do you guys think this paradox will work itself out?
My best idea is that when your other self arrives in the future to steal the money, the teller will hand over a bag of exactly $2000 in cash. Why? Because it was the deposit you made the day before and they hadn't processed it yet. Therefore, you just stole $2000 of your own money!
You then return to the present day with your money, and invest it in the SAME bank. Now, since you already have $2000 in your account, you no longer have a need to rob a bank for cash. Therefore, will your robbery of the bank still occur?
So how do you guys think this paradox will work itself out?
My best idea is that when your other self arrives in the future to steal the money, the teller will hand over a bag of exactly $2000 in cash. Why? Because it was the deposit you made the day before and they hadn't processed it yet. Therefore, you just stole $2000 of your own money!