TimeLord Reviews: Matt Smith

Recommended Videos

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43


[HEADING=1]Geronimo![/HEADING]​
My first ever review. Any advice is welcome!

Dedicated to The Escapist TARDIS Crew [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/The-Escapist-TARDIS-Crew].

Here be series 5 spoilers. You have been warned.

Matt Smith (from this point on called "11" for ease) is the 11th incarnation of the Doctor. After regenerating from David Tennant on New Years day. A hard act to follow. Matt Smith had his work cut out to impress many a Tennant fan. Including myself. That he was a worthy successor to arguably the best Doctor ever.[footnote] Actually proved as such as polls taken at the time of David Tennant's time put him as the best Doctor ever. Finally knocking off Tom Baker into 2nd place.[/footnote]

In this review I will talk about Matt Smith in general and talk about one of my favourite episodes from series 5; The Big Bang.

[HEADING=2]Character[/HEADING]​

My main concern after watching 11s first full episode "The 11th Hour" was that Smith was trying just too hard to be Tennant. A thought shared by a lot of my fellow friends and Whovians. Maybe it was just his post-regeneration madness that every Doctor goes through? Luckily these thoughts were quickly dismissed in the later episodes as 11 established his character and relationship with his new companion; Amy Pond.

One of the features in "The Beast Below" and "Flesh and Stone" was that 11s Doctor gets very angry in stressful situations.[footnote]Not overly worrying in itself as each Doctor had moments like this themselves.[/footnote] But rather he takes out his anger at the companion of the moment (Amy and River respectively). Now I know this is more a writing point my Steven Moffat, but I have always felt that the Doctor should never shout (in angry tones) at his companion, he can do all the shouting he wants at his enemies, but taking out his frustration on his companion was not a good idea in my opinion. Obviously is evolves his character and makes him different to other Doctors. So I just hope Moffat doesn't make a habit of it. He was also easily agitated when people or objects did not do as he wished them to, and would resort to physical confrontation and somewhat reckless behaviour to achieve his goals. He is able to spin things to his point of view, and could find positive outlooks in negative situations.[footnote]"We're in a giant mouth? Yes, yes, yes but on the plus side: roomy!"[/footnote] He was somewhat more melodramatic in his brilliance, going so far as to prove Fermat's last theorem, faster-than-light travel and why electrons had mass, just to prove he could be trusted.
Much like his second incarnation, this incarnation showed a childlike recklessness, but always had a grander scheme behind his actions. Also similar to his second incarnation, 11 had a knack for acting smug, occasionally boasting about his feats, knowledge, and reputation.
Much like his fourth, sixth, and ninth incarnations, this Doctor was much more outwardly alien and wasn't as in touch with Humanity as his fifth, eighth and previous incarnation were. The eleventh incarnation believed that a Human's ability to feel pain and suffering defined their Humanity. He was unable to comfort an upset Vincent Van Gogh and found it difficult to act like an average Human when staying with Craig Owens.

Much of 11s character and style can be summed up in one of my favourite episodes:

[HEADING=2]The Pandorica Opens/The Big Bang[/HEADING]​
It feels a little cheap to use the series finale as a starting point to talk about his character, but this is my review!
In finale episodes "The Pandorica Opens" and "The Big Bang", characters from the series communicate a message to him. Vincent van Gogh[footnote]Another awesome and emotional episode: "Vincent and the Doctor"[/footnote] paints a psychic message of the TARDIS exploding, which passes from Winston Churchill to Queen Elizabeth X, before reaching the Doctor via River Song. An alliance of the Doctor's greatest enemies seal him in the 'Pandorica', the perfect prison. When the TARDIS explodes, a new time line is created where the Earth is the only planet in a universe without stars. The Doctor is freed by a Nestine duplicate of Rory, ultimately using the Pandorica to resurrect the universe, seal the cracks, and undo their effects.
[HEADING=2]"But you're
not in the Pandorica?
Yes I am. Well I'm not
now but I was back then!"[/HEADING]​
In the process, the Doctor tells Amy that her parents were taken by the crack in her wall, which is why she never had any. When he sacrifices himself to restart the universe, the Doctor tells Amy to think of her parents and they will come back, with no regard for surviving himself. As the Doctor know he will probably be erased from existence because of his own actions. Up until this point in the episode, the episode has been light hearted. With 11 showing familiar energy and eccentricness.[footnote]Not an actual word[/footnote] Jumping between times with River's Vortex Manipulator, speaking to his companions and generally running about a lot.

In conclusion: Welcome to the TARDIS Matt Smith. You are going to be awesome!

[HEADING=2]Fezes are cool![/HEADING][footnote]Bow ties are also cool[/footnote]​



I plan to do a review of David Tennant and Christopher Eccleston once I have the time.[footnote]HA! Ironic statement[/footnote]
 

Jedamethis

New member
Jul 24, 2009
6,953
0
0
It's eccentricity silly!

Anywho, uh, good review! Yes!


...

I can't think of anything else to say >.>
 

Swarley

New member
Apr 5, 2010
615
0
0
TimeLord said:
Actually proved as such as polls taken at the time of David Tennant's time put him as the best Doctor ever.
A large amount of people having a similiar opinion does not "prove" anything beyond it being popular.

Anyway, I agree with much of your analysis, especially;

TimeLord said:
11 had a knack for acting smug, occasionally boasting about his feats, knowledge, and reputation.
I loved his smugness, which is what put him above Eccleston for me.
 

tomtom94

aka "Who?"
May 11, 2009
3,373
0
0
The thing I've noticed since watching Matt Smith is that David Tennant evidently used to eat several of Brian Blessed's ham sandwiches before every performance.

Literally EVERY time he got shouty. Especially Waters of Mars.

I love Matt Smith so far and can't wait for the Christmas special so I can get another dose. One thing I will say is that in the recent SJA he either took over the screen or was virtually invisible, he didn't really seem to be able to react with Elisabeth Sladen and co in the same way he could with Pond.

Bit of a brief review but nothing a quick time loop can't fix I'm sure. :p
 

nick4118

New member
Jun 4, 2009
95
0
0
I'm going to agree with you here. Matt Smith makes an amazing Doctor. Although David tennant will always be my personal favorite Matt is doing a heck of a job living up to his legacy.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
Actually proved as such as polls taken at the time of David Tennant's time put him as the best Doctor ever.
A large amount of people having a similiar opinion does not "prove" anything beyond it being popular.
So who be your favourite Doctor?

*hopes David Tennant for the irony*
 

Swarley

New member
Apr 5, 2010
615
0
0
TimeLord said:
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
Actually proved as such as polls taken at the time of David Tennant's time put him as the best Doctor ever.
A large amount of people having a similiar opinion does not "prove" anything beyond it being popular.
So who be your favourite Doctor?

*hopes David Tennant for the irony*
It is Tennant, but it isn't irony.

Saying being popular = being best means you think Call of Duty is the best video game series, Avatar was the best movie, and Twilight is one of the best books.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
Actually proved as such as polls taken at the time of David Tennant's time put him as the best Doctor ever.
A large amount of people having a similiar opinion does not "prove" anything beyond it being popular.
So who be your favourite Doctor?

*hopes David Tennant for the irony*
It is Tennant, but it isn't irony.

Saying being popular = being best means you think Call of Duty is the best video game series, Avatar was the best movie, and Twilight is one of the best books.
But there aren't 11 different Avatar films to make one of them the best by popularity. The best actor who plays the Doctor is driven by the fans who like/d him. If Matt Smith was an aweful actor, but he was top of any poll of the Doctors you care to mention. Then he would be best in the eyes of the people who watch it. What else defines "the best"? Reviews? Personal opinion defines the best of something,
 

Swarley

New member
Apr 5, 2010
615
0
0
TimeLord said:
But there aren't 11 different Avatar films to make one of them the best by popularity. The best actor who plays the Doctor is driven by the fans who like/d him. If Matt Smith was an aweful actor, but he was top of any poll of the Doctors you care to mention. Then he would be best in the eyes of the people who watch it. What else defines "the best"? Reviews? Personal opinion defines the best of something,
The best implies superiority over something else in the same area.

Being popular =/= the best

There are thousands of books published every year, but Twilight is very popular and well received, does that make it "better" than other books?
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
tomtom94 said:
The thing I've noticed since watching Matt Smith is that David Tennant evidently used to eat several of Brian Blessed's ham sandwiches before every performance.

Literally EVERY time he got shouty. Especially Waters of Mars.
Very much agree. David Tennant as John Smith is WAY better than DT as the Doctor.

TimeLord said:
but I have always felt that the Doctor should never shout (in angry tones) at his companion, he can do all the shouting he wants at his enemies, but taking out his frustration on his companion was not a good idea in my opinion.
This was always a sticking point with Colin Baker. People hated him almost purely for his attack on Peri, forgetting that he was the most intelligent of the regenerations ( he was the only one who got the Chameleon Circuit working). Sylvester McCoy's Doctor was downright evil at times.

But yeah, Matt Smith has an eccentricity and a sheer joyfulness that reminds me a lot of Tom Baker, and that's never a bad thing, IMNSHO.
 

Ubermetalhed

New member
Sep 15, 2009
905
0
0
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
Actually proved as such as polls taken at the time of David Tennant's time put him as the best Doctor ever.
A large amount of people having a similiar opinion does not "prove" anything beyond it being popular.
So who be your favourite Doctor?

*hopes David Tennant for the irony*
It is Tennant, but it isn't irony.

Saying being popular = being best means you think Call of Duty is the best video game series, Avatar was the best movie, and Twilight is one of the best books.
I agree. Popular does not equal the best.

I think Matt Smith was surprisingly excellent. Although the last episode was truly awful which is a shame for a series which had some very good Doctor Who episodes.

I am going to be different now and say Tennant was an awful Doctor but I attribute this to the writing more than the actor.

Davies era DW was dire, for a fan of the original and far superior series, Davies nearly ruined DW beyond repair. It was like George Lucas and the starwars prequels.

Also the OP mentioned the Doctor shouldn't get angry at his companions. You should see some earlier DW then, especially the first Doctor William Hartnell. He is often scolding towards others, you can see it in the very first DW episode in fact.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
But there aren't 11 different Avatar films to make one of them the best by popularity. The best actor who plays the Doctor is driven by the fans who like/d him. If Matt Smith was an aweful actor, but he was top of any poll of the Doctors you care to mention. Then he would be best in the eyes of the people who watch it. What else defines "the best"? Reviews? Personal opinion defines the best of something,
The best implies superiority over something else in the same area.

Being popular =/= the best

There are thousands of books published every year, but Twilight is very popular and well received, does that make it "better" than other books?
You keep saying what doesn't define the best of something. But what does? How do you work out the best Doctor? Personal opinion defines the best I think.

Ubermetalhed said:
Also the OP mentioned the Doctor shouldn't get angry at his companions. You should see some earlier DW then, especially the first Doctor William Hartnell. He is often scolding towards others, you can see it in the very first DW episode in fact.
I agree. I have seen older episodes where the Doctor is angry at his companions but my point is I don't think it is a good way to define his character. All 11 of them. That's just my opinion though.
 

Swarley

New member
Apr 5, 2010
615
0
0
TimeLord said:
You keep saying what doesn't define the best of something. But what does? How do you work out the best Doctor? Personal opinion defines the best I think.
I'm not attempting to define what Doctor is best, since it's all opinion. My point was that you are misinterpreting popularity as superiority.

Look at it this way, I agree with you that Tennant was the best. We can't tell someone who thinks that Smith was the best that he is wrong because Smith isn't as popular as Tennant, since that's just opinions telling opinions that their opinions are wrong because we have more opinions than them. We could say we thought he was best for any number of reasons, but simply saying "it's popular ipso facto it's better" is simply a misinterpretation.

So what I'm saying here is that you think David Tennant played the best Doctor. I agree.

You say this is true because he is popular, I disagree with that, and with thinking popularity = quality.

If you had said David Tennant was the best because you felt he played the character in an interesting way that showed off his talent as an actor as well as the talent of the other creators and writers of the show, I would agree.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
You keep saying what doesn't define the best of something. But what does? How do you work out the best Doctor? Personal opinion defines the best I think.
I'm not attempting to define what Doctor is best, since it's all opinion. My point was that you are misinterpreting popularity as superiority.

Look at it this way, I agree with you that Tennant was the best. We can't tell someone who thinks that Smith was the best that he is wrong because Smith isn't as popular as Tennant, since that's just opinions telling opinions that their opinions are wrong because we have more opinions than them. We could say we thought he was best for any number of reasons, but simply saying "it's popular ipso facto it's better" is simply a misinterpretation.

So what I'm saying here is that you think David Tennant played the best Doctor. I agree.

You say this is true because he is popular, I disagree with that, and with thinking popularity = quality.

If you had said David Tennant was the best because you felt he played the character in an interesting way that showed off his talent as an actor as well as the talent of the other creators and writers of the show, I would agree.
I agree that popularity doesn't equal best. By mistake.
But I think we are just saying the same things about opinion to each other now.
Shall we just call it quits? :p
 

Swarley

New member
Apr 5, 2010
615
0
0
TimeLord said:
I agree that popularity doesn't equal best. By mistake.
But I think we are just saying the same things about opinion to each other now.
Shall we just call it quits? :p
Well that was my entire point, so it's probably best we stop bickering over small statements and get back to out mutual love of Doctor Who.

My main issue with Smith's series is that rather than the older way of small hints going toward a great finale (The Master's posters, or even the newspaper headline about Harold Saxon late in Tennant's first season for example) they went with a format similar to his last season where they knew something was going on, which I personally thought wasn't as fun as analyzing little tid bits from episodes.
 

Blondi3

New member
Sep 12, 2008
244
0
0
haha hey there Swarley. Tennant is amazing and my favorite but I agree that Matt Smith brings his own nature to the Doctor. He's a worthy replacement. Although I have to be honest I only started at Eccleston so my knowledge of the older Doctors and their ways is very limited. I will eventually get around to watching the older ones but finding them online isn't easy.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Swarley said:
TimeLord said:
I agree that popularity doesn't equal best. By mistake.
But I think we are just saying the same things about opinion to each other now.
Shall we just call it quits? :p
Well that was my entire point, so it's probably best we stop bickering over small statements and get back to out mutual love of Doctor Who.

My main issue with Smith's series is that rather than the older way of small hints going toward a great finale (The Master's posters, or even the newspaper headline about Harold Saxon late in Tennant's first season for example) they went with a format similar to his last season where they knew something was going on, which I personally thought wasn't as fun as analyzing little tid bits from episodes.
It did make the ending a bit of an anti-climax in what caused everything didn't it? Except for "The Silence" which has still yet to fall. As you say the Harold Saxon and (for me) Bad Wolf were subtle plots and not in-your-face obvious.
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Blondi3 said:
haha hey there Swarley. Tennant is amazing and my favorite but I agree that Matt Smith brings his own nature to the Doctor. He's a worthy replacement. Although I have to be honest I only started at Eccleston so my knowledge of the older Doctors and their ways is very limited. I will eventually get around to watching the older ones but finding them online isn't easy.
*cough* http://www.doctorwho-episodes.com/ *cough*
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
Great review.

I didn't like the finale episodes this time. They were funny, but they were just too funny to take seriously. The ending, how the Doctor escaped being erased from existence, was preposterous. Yes it is fiction, but it isn't believable by fiction standards; I would even say that it isn't believable by Doctor Who standards. They should have just written a way for him to solve the problem by not killing himself in the process.

Also, there were two time paradoxes. I don't care what shape the universe is in, the time cleaning creatures should have showed up.

I really liked the stories and the mysterious crack situation that lead up to the finale episodes, but those last to episodes ruined the epic awesomeness that the season was growing into. My favorite analogy would be that the epic train was chugging along at full steam, and then it hit a giant cow on the track and derailed. This season quickly became a fail train.

Eleven was beginning to grow on me, but the last episodes set him back to 0 for me. He was just too zany. Especially for the situation. I should have seen it coming with some of the things that happened in the previous episodes:

The scene in "The Lodger" where 11 blows up on the soccer player when the player says that they are going to "kill" the competition. The Doctor has over 900 years of memories and experiences, but he doesn't realize that the guy meant that they were just going to win against the competition?

To keep the show watchable for me, I'm just going to come to the conclusion that something went wrong with the regeneration between 10 and 11, something like between 5 and 6. Maybe because 10 held on so long and "didn't want to go", he messed up his next incarnation.