Tits on the YouTube Homepage
- Thread starter MurderousToaster
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Can I point out that people who are seeing this on their youtube homepages are seeing it because they have watched "similar programmes" in the past and youtube is suggesting the programme for them, so children who see it have seen nothing worse already 
If you don't believe me sign out and look at the homepage again.
If you don't believe me sign out and look at the homepage again.
Are we all looking at the same picture? To me it's not just breasts, it's a naked man and woman with the man inserting something into her. That's more than just an innocent softcore image of breasts. That's a fully pornographic image. I mean really, are we looking at the same picture because I don't see just breasts.
Sweet.
Nudity isn't obscene. Internet videos of people being ripped in half with a chainsaw are obscene, but you don't see threads freaking out about those at the same rate, now do you...?
The more nudity there isn't censored to all hell, the more people will realize that it isn't a big deal and the less prudish idiots will go on about "SAVING THE CHILDREN FROM BARE SKIN!!"
Nudity isn't obscene. Internet videos of people being ripped in half with a chainsaw are obscene, but you don't see threads freaking out about those at the same rate, now do you...?
The more nudity there isn't censored to all hell, the more people will realize that it isn't a big deal and the less prudish idiots will go on about "SAVING THE CHILDREN FROM BARE SKIN!!"
I took a print screen of it when it showed up on my home page this morning and emaild it to a bunch of friends.
Look at the picture, please. Because the answer to your questions is yes. Not specifically a cucumber, but still.Azrael the Cat said:
InterAirplay said:
I'll make this short, Denmark is awesome with our liberal mindset towards sex. At this very moment, there is nude people in a commercial for a phonecompany. We are not frightened by boobs, vaginas or penis'es at all. I can't recall the last time i saw a danish movie or tv series that didn't have any sort of nudity in it at all. Even some children shows feature nudity. Because it aint no god damn big deal!Dethpixie said:
And about the rent? If you want to live here, you better have deep pockets.. 40-60% taxes depending on your income level (Basicly 70% of all working people here pay 60% in taxes) 180% taxes on cars, so that means you will have to be upper middle class if you can afford a VW Golf.
And, if you want to live in Copenhagen you will be raped by the rent.
But if your a student, even from another country, education is free - and you get a monthly social benefit, an amount circa 1000 USD to live for.
That said... Boobies are nice.
you can find boods on youtube, it's just really difficult and really not worth the effort involvedThaius said:
I'll agree that there's biological indicators that suggest health of a person but no single part of the body is entirely excluded in this aspect. Hair, toes, the color of your eyes even, are all indicators of your health and genes. It would be foolish to say that breasts wouldn't be apart of the entire package, they are.Generic Gamer said:
But if you look at other societies, their perspective of an attractive breast is completely different from other time frames or countries. A documentary I saw (I think it was a documentary) gave examples.
Africa considered sagging breasts beautiful because it indicated the ability/history of effective nursing.
There was a time frame where small breasts were considered the 'best' and and later 'largest' were best. What I constantly think back to is how a woman's ankle was once considered highly sexual (refer to that one Simpsons scene where a photograph of a woman's ankle is taken and the man proclaims "Her privates are showing!" then a sinister minded man coverts the photo with perversion where as no one in today's society (or any I'd assume) would consider is pornographic.)
All in all, symmetry is the ultimate sign of health. But as a thread on breasts specifically; They are not obscene. I am in favor of public-breast-feeding. Our Canadian laws allow toplessness of both genders in public. No one is going to be traumatized by a breast, an image of a breast (albeit unless in a traumatic light such as in the process of violent mutilation or something), and in general it should be considered equally benign as viewing any other part of the human body (with perhaps except the genitalia).
I'm well aware that censorship is worse in America- but it's the UK we're dealing with in this thread.Jazoni89 said:
Tits? On the internet? Oh, the humanity!
This is kind of old news, actually... not that big of a deal. As George Carlin would probably have said, just go to a different website if you're offended. The 10 year old kids who saw it were probably breastfeeding less than a decade ago anyway.
This is kind of old news, actually... not that big of a deal. As George Carlin would probably have said, just go to a different website if you're offended. The 10 year old kids who saw it were probably breastfeeding less than a decade ago anyway.
i know as soon as i saw it i was like craaap this is sposed to be nude free and noone would believe me...of course then i had to ask myself do i press the mouse
