Well personally I would say it was a future where Stalinism was surpassed by an even worse extreme. I.e. this was a warning of where Stalinism would lead.albino boo said:That is your opinion and you perfectly entitled to it. However the KGB did not agree with you and attempted to use its agents in the UK to stop it being published in the same way the tried with Animal farm. They failed but in the case of Animal Farm they managed to get the initial publisher to drop and it a year to find another willing. Furthermore Orwell had to flee from Republican Spain in 37 because of denunciations to the Tribunal for Espionage & High Treason of rabid Trotskyism by NKVD agents in the Spanish Republican government.Silvanus said:As someone who studied the book, I strongly disagree with this. The USSR provide a great deal of the basis for Oceania in Nineteen Eighty-Four, but Orwell's creation is a hypothetical society in which the control is taken to an extreme never seen on earth. It is a possible end-point for the direction certain societies seemed to be taking at that point in time, and a warning of such, but it goes well beyond simply reflecting what was happening in reality.albino boo said:All Orwell is doing is truthfully representing how the the soviet union worked under Stalinism. Trying to read more than that into the book will fail because it is only there to provide a framework into which the real actions of Stalinism is to be placed into.