Not a Sony fangirl, not a 360 fangirl, anything can get hacked, period. I've had my identity stolen, but it had squat to do with any gaming account.
No. Anything can be hacked given time and motivation, and motivation is the only thing hackers lack, if Microsoft ever pisses off the right people, this could happen to them.SlasherX said:This wouldn't happen. Not now. Not ever. The vast difference between Sony's resources and Microsoft's is one reason. There is also the fact that Live is a subsidiary of Microsoft. Microsoft, you know one of the largest corporations on Earth owned by the second richest man in the world that you would have to be brain dead to take on or try to hack. Theres also the fact that people knew that Sony's servers were insecure. You hear all these people saying they knew they were insecure, but you don't hear that about Live. And another reason is that the hated "You have to pay" feature makes it where their are a lot of people dedicated to it and gives it a higher priority within Microsoft than the PS3 has in Sony, because the Xbox and it's services ae a money maker unlike the PS3 which is still losing money on its consoles.
tl;dr Live wont be hacked
Now I wait, because this site has many more PS3 fanboys than Xbox.
Looks like you're refusing to take the high road, which is a bad thing when trying to make your point sound more valid that someone else's.RanD00M said:And my last point will be that you have horrible grammar. A bad thing when trying to sound serious.
Same as above, just with more irony.alrekr said:Bad grammar is aterriableterrible crime and really does ruin forums; if people at least made an effort to use properenglishEnglish[comma] the world would be a better place. You[comma] sir[comma] don't even have the excuse of not havingenglishEnglish as your first language, asyouryou're from the USA.
I'm sorry but i can't help but to reply to a post like yours.Kune35 said:You know what WOULD have stopped PSN from being hacked? Having a firewall, or up to date security software. Sure, its not IMPOSSIBLE for XBL to be hacked, but it is almost infinitely more difficult since they actually use basic system security measures.thelonewolf266 said:I own an Xbox I think live is a lot better than PSN even before the breach but i also think PlayStation has features that are better than Xbox even considering this I think the Xbox is better however I still think you are an idiot if you think it couldn't be hacked just because Microsoft is rich.Sony is worth at least $31.741 billion probably a lot more, that didn't stop them from being hacked.The simple fact is that no Network is one hundred percent secure.
2/3rds of it goes to advertising, the rest goes to maintaining servers for hip games you probably won't ever have the time to play.Sapient Pearwood said:It does? Loads of 360 owners here. And Sony is huge, if people are brave enough to take on Sony why would they think twice about Microsoft? And that monthly fee you pay doesn't necessarily all go on security, my guess would be a very small amount of it ever goes on anything that directly benefits the customers.SlasherX said:Now I wait, because this site has many more PS3 fanboys than Xbox.
Get out newfa-... newfriend, your attempts to troll will not work here. 0/10disturbed_one said:Y U MAD BRO?
It seems to me like you're some sort of an Xbox fan. But have you noticed that Sony is also a big corporation. Money doesn't matter really, it's who hackers are annoyed with, or if there is some sort of long term goal for them. Maybe it was Microsoft who paid hackers to do that(because I seriously doubt anyone in m$ would know how to do that). There is a lot we don't know, corporate espionage and stuff like that. Who knows what's really happening behind the scenes, and who can profit from the whole situation. And maybe it's just those guys from /b/...
This mindset is why the PSN was hacked.SlasherX said:This wouldn't happen. Not now. Not ever.
Microsoft's assets were roughly $86 billion as of 2010, Sony's assets were roughly $136 billion as of 2009.The vast difference between Sony's resources and Microsoft's is one reason.
First, the personal wealth of Bill Gates has nothing to do with the finances of Microsoft. Second, Gates stepped down as primary manager of Microsoft in 2006, handing his duties as Chief Strategy Officer over to Craig Mundie, and his position as Chief Software Architect to Ray Ozzie, the transition for which was finalized in 2008. He hasn't been CEO since 2000, where he handed that over to Steve Ballmer.There is also the fact that Live is a subsidiary of Microsoft. Microsoft, you know one of the largest corporations on Earth owned by the second richest man in the world that you would have to be brain dead to take on or try to hack.
Unless you worked within Sony, you weren't hearing that their servers were insecure until after the hack had occurred (at which point you could just assume they were insecure).Theres also the fact that people knew that Sony's servers were insecure. You hear all these people saying they knew they were insecure, but you don't hear that about Live.
Do you know how many personnel are dedicated to serving XBL / PSN? Any idea? General number? Anything. Do you have any even tangential proof of this, or is it just an assumption on your part?And another reason is that the hated "You have to pay" feature makes it where their are a lot of people dedicated to it and gives it a higher priority within Microsoft than the PS3 has in Sony, because the Xbox and it's services ae a money maker unlike the PS3 which is still losing money on its consoles.
ur going to use the site that is credited for being one of the least correct sites on the internet as your source? using wikipedia seriously hurts your caseMoriarty said:no.SlasherX said:The thing I was trying to say is that Microsoft is a larger corporation by a pretty substantial margin and that there was still more money focused on security and Live in general than what is on the PSN.
Sony is actually "bigger" than Microsoft, not the other way around.
According to Wikipedia:
Sony: Total assets ¥11.22 trillion / $137.694 billion (2010)
Microsoft: Total assets US$ 86.113 billion (2010)
While the 2000 incident is pretty solid evidence, the hacked points incident does not support your statement. As the article you linked said, Microsoft was on to them within hours. While there were millions of dollars of losses, it obviously did not sink the company.ShakesZX said:Awww.... Obvious Troll is so cute....
I love how the internet can let any baseless and uncredited comment sound like fact if shouted with enough ferocity. It's probably the same type of thinking that one company is more secure than another that led to the false sense of security which enabled the hackers. Microsoft is nowhere near impenetrable, as a quick google search [http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1TSND_enUS414US414&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=microsoft+hacked] highlights:
hacked points [http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/710979/microsoft-to-invalidate-hacked-point-codes/]
2000 incident [http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-247716.html]
Sony's 2009 financial records statment:Ceroxis said:ur going to use the site that is credited for being one of the least correct sites on the internet as your source? using wikipedia seriously hurts your case
That's a ridiculous statement, because anything can be hacked with enough patience, and finding the right loopholes.SlasherX said:This wouldn't happen. Not now. Not ever. The vast difference between Sony's resources and Microsoft's is one reason. There is also the fact that Live is a subsidiary of Microsoft. Microsoft, you know one of the largest corporations on Earth owned by the second richest man in the world that you would have to be brain dead to take on or try to hack. Theres also the fact that people knew that Sony's servers were insecure. You hear all these people saying they knew they were insecure, but you don't hear that about Live. And another reason is that the hated "You have to pay" feature makes it where their are a lot of people dedicated to it and gives it a higher priority within Microsoft than the PS3 has in Sony, because the Xbox and it's services ae a money maker unlike the PS3 which is still losing money on its consoles.
tl;dr Live wont be hacked
Now I wait, because this site has many more PS3 fanboys than Xbox.
i dunno about "infinitely" more difficult, i'm sure the data could be quantified.Kune35 said:You know what WOULD have stopped PSN from being hacked? Having a firewall, or up to date security software. Sure, its not IMPOSSIBLE for XBL to be hacked, but it is almost infinitely more difficult since they actually use basic system security measures.