To the people saying that Live could be breached like Sony.

Recommended Videos

TheDarkestDerp

New member
Dec 6, 2010
499
0
0
Not a Sony fangirl, not a 360 fangirl, anything can get hacked, period. I've had my identity stolen, but it had squat to do with any gaming account.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
SlasherX said:
This wouldn't happen. Not now. Not ever. The vast difference between Sony's resources and Microsoft's is one reason. There is also the fact that Live is a subsidiary of Microsoft. Microsoft, you know one of the largest corporations on Earth owned by the second richest man in the world that you would have to be brain dead to take on or try to hack. Theres also the fact that people knew that Sony's servers were insecure. You hear all these people saying they knew they were insecure, but you don't hear that about Live. And another reason is that the hated "You have to pay" feature makes it where their are a lot of people dedicated to it and gives it a higher priority within Microsoft than the PS3 has in Sony, because the Xbox and it's services ae a money maker unlike the PS3 which is still losing money on its consoles.

tl;dr Live wont be hacked

Now I wait, because this site has many more PS3 fanboys than Xbox.
No. Anything can be hacked given time and motivation, and motivation is the only thing hackers lack, if Microsoft ever pisses off the right people, this could happen to them.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
RanD00M said:
And my last point will be that you have horrible grammar. A bad thing when trying to sound serious.
Looks like you're refusing to take the high road, which is a bad thing when trying to make your point sound more valid that someone else's.

alrekr said:
Bad grammar is a terriable terrible crime and really does ruin forums; if people at least made an effort to use proper english English[comma] the world would be a better place. You[comma] sir[comma] don't even have the excuse of not having english English as your first language, as your you're from the USA.
Same as above, just with more irony.
 

Yoh3333

New member
Feb 7, 2011
159
0
0
Kune35 said:
thelonewolf266 said:
I own an Xbox I think live is a lot better than PSN even before the breach but i also think PlayStation has features that are better than Xbox even considering this I think the Xbox is better however I still think you are an idiot if you think it couldn't be hacked just because Microsoft is rich.Sony is worth at least $31.741 billion probably a lot more, that didn't stop them from being hacked.The simple fact is that no Network is one hundred percent secure.
You know what WOULD have stopped PSN from being hacked? Having a firewall, or up to date security software. Sure, its not IMPOSSIBLE for XBL to be hacked, but it is almost infinitely more difficult since they actually use basic system security measures.
I'm sorry but i can't help but to reply to a post like yours.
You must have no idea of sony's security saying it lacks basic stuff like a firewall.. how is it they mentioned they were going to implement an extra firewall now that the otherS had been breached? You seem to not even think twice about what you posted, but it's okay. Just wanted to point out that Sony, dispite what people are saying, was not all that incompetent. They did go around bragging about their security but they should've known any system would get hacked.

OT: Both systems have good security, Sony was just the one to fall first.
No system invented in this year will not be hacked in the next 10 years. By then we will have so many tools at our disposal that people learning code would maybe be able to hack our times XBL for testing.
 

Roan Berg

New member
Jul 17, 2010
32
0
0
Sapient Pearwood said:
SlasherX said:
Now I wait, because this site has many more PS3 fanboys than Xbox.
It does? Loads of 360 owners here. And Sony is huge, if people are brave enough to take on Sony why would they think twice about Microsoft? And that monthly fee you pay doesn't necessarily all go on security, my guess would be a very small amount of it ever goes on anything that directly benefits the customers.
2/3rds of it goes to advertising, the rest goes to maintaining servers for hip games you probably won't ever have the time to play.
Literally, you're paying to be given advertisements.
 

Jerome9157

New member
Nov 22, 2010
110
0
0
disturbed_one said:
Y U MAD BRO?

It seems to me like you're some sort of an Xbox fan. But have you noticed that Sony is also a big corporation. Money doesn't matter really, it's who hackers are annoyed with, or if there is some sort of long term goal for them. Maybe it was Microsoft who paid hackers to do that(because I seriously doubt anyone in m$ would know how to do that ;) ). There is a lot we don't know, corporate espionage and stuff like that. Who knows what's really happening behind the scenes, and who can profit from the whole situation. And maybe it's just those guys from /b/...
Get out newfa-... newfriend, your attempts to troll will not work here. 0/10
 

Caligulove

New member
Sep 25, 2008
3,029
0
0
I disagree. Anything can be hacked, it's just a matter of Sony pissing off the right person or someone wanting to prove something- who knows. I agree that Xbox is probably more secure. But then again, holy shit, Sony was running PSN on outdated Apache versions and kept customer/client info on plain txt files. It's less of a matter that it's amazing that someone pulled this off but that Sony was careless and was probably asking to be hacked or some kind of logic.

If someone wanted to be a dick and bring down XBL, I do think it could be done- it just wouldn't be as easy
 

shadowform

New member
Jan 5, 2009
118
0
0
SlasherX said:
This wouldn't happen. Not now. Not ever.
This mindset is why the PSN was hacked.

The vast difference between Sony's resources and Microsoft's is one reason.
Microsoft's assets were roughly $86 billion as of 2010, Sony's assets were roughly $136 billion as of 2009.

There is also the fact that Live is a subsidiary of Microsoft. Microsoft, you know one of the largest corporations on Earth owned by the second richest man in the world that you would have to be brain dead to take on or try to hack.
First, the personal wealth of Bill Gates has nothing to do with the finances of Microsoft. Second, Gates stepped down as primary manager of Microsoft in 2006, handing his duties as Chief Strategy Officer over to Craig Mundie, and his position as Chief Software Architect to Ray Ozzie, the transition for which was finalized in 2008. He hasn't been CEO since 2000, where he handed that over to Steve Ballmer.

Theres also the fact that people knew that Sony's servers were insecure. You hear all these people saying they knew they were insecure, but you don't hear that about Live.
Unless you worked within Sony, you weren't hearing that their servers were insecure until after the hack had occurred (at which point you could just assume they were insecure).

And another reason is that the hated "You have to pay" feature makes it where their are a lot of people dedicated to it and gives it a higher priority within Microsoft than the PS3 has in Sony, because the Xbox and it's services ae a money maker unlike the PS3 which is still losing money on its consoles.
Do you know how many personnel are dedicated to serving XBL / PSN? Any idea? General number? Anything. Do you have any even tangential proof of this, or is it just an assumption on your part?


PS: I don't own a PS3. I'm xbox-only.
 

LuckyClover95

New member
Jun 7, 2010
715
0
0
If sony were really that insecure, they'd have been hacked before. They were some REALLY good hackers.
 

Ceroxis

New member
Mar 27, 2011
4
0
0
Moriarty said:
SlasherX said:
The thing I was trying to say is that Microsoft is a larger corporation by a pretty substantial margin and that there was still more money focused on security and Live in general than what is on the PSN.
no.

Sony is actually "bigger" than Microsoft, not the other way around.

According to Wikipedia:

Sony: Total assets ¥11.22 trillion / $137.694 billion (2010)
Microsoft: Total assets US$ 86.113 billion (2010)
ur going to use the site that is credited for being one of the least correct sites on the internet as your source? using wikipedia seriously hurts your case
 

Spartan448

New member
Apr 2, 2011
539
0
0
ShakesZX said:
Awww.... Obvious Troll is so cute....

I love how the internet can let any baseless and uncredited comment sound like fact if shouted with enough ferocity. It's probably the same type of thinking that one company is more secure than another that led to the false sense of security which enabled the hackers. Microsoft is nowhere near impenetrable, as a quick google search [http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1TSND_enUS414US414&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=microsoft+hacked] highlights:

hacked points [http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/710979/microsoft-to-invalidate-hacked-point-codes/]
2000 incident [http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-247716.html]
While the 2000 incident is pretty solid evidence, the hacked points incident does not support your statement. As the article you linked said, Microsoft was on to them within hours. While there were millions of dollars of losses, it obviously did not sink the company.

There is no such thing as a foolproof security system (Except for TNT boobytraps in Minecraft). So instead of being just the least vulnerable, it comes down to the person who's least vulerable (Live), quickest to respond (Live), and most competent (After the PSN incident, this goes to Live), is the one who one day rules the world.
 

masher

New member
Jul 20, 2009
745
0
0
Not saying that it'll never, ever, ever, positivity -never-, happen, but Live -is- way more secure than PSN is.

Quite honestly, you get what you pay for.
 

shadowform

New member
Jan 5, 2009
118
0
0
Ceroxis said:
ur going to use the site that is credited for being one of the least correct sites on the internet as your source? using wikipedia seriously hurts your case
Sony's 2009 financial records statment:
http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/08q4_sony.pdf

Microsoft similarly publishes their annual financial statement, as per US law.
http://www.microsoft.com/investor/reports/ar10/

[edit] Removed redundant redundancy.
 

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
SlasherX said:
This wouldn't happen. Not now. Not ever. The vast difference between Sony's resources and Microsoft's is one reason. There is also the fact that Live is a subsidiary of Microsoft. Microsoft, you know one of the largest corporations on Earth owned by the second richest man in the world that you would have to be brain dead to take on or try to hack. Theres also the fact that people knew that Sony's servers were insecure. You hear all these people saying they knew they were insecure, but you don't hear that about Live. And another reason is that the hated "You have to pay" feature makes it where their are a lot of people dedicated to it and gives it a higher priority within Microsoft than the PS3 has in Sony, because the Xbox and it's services ae a money maker unlike the PS3 which is still losing money on its consoles.

tl;dr Live wont be hacked

Now I wait, because this site has many more PS3 fanboys than Xbox.
That's a ridiculous statement, because anything can be hacked with enough patience, and finding the right loopholes.

Also, Microsoft's track record is hardly brilliant. The frequency with which patches are released for windows which start with the words 'A security vulnerability was found in [insert microsoft product name here] that allows a hacker to take remote control of a compromised system" is far too frequent to believe microsoft is invulnerable to hacking.

Chances are there are more than enough security holes in Xbox live for a determined hacker to be able to compromise the system, but hopefully Microsoft's overall security setup isn't as naive as Sony's seemed to be.
 

RoBi3.0

New member
Mar 29, 2009
709
0
0
General Custard
Napoleon
The Titanic
The Third Reich

Really I could go on and on. My point is that history is full of people and things that were supposedly unstoppable. People who were subsequently proven wrong. The only lesson we can glean for all of this is that regardless either through shitty luck or pissing off enough of the right people or a combination off both, you will eventually go down.

I think the most telling thing of all is how Microsoft isn't running it's mouth off. I have yet to read a press release from them stating that this could never happen to them. You know why that is? Its cause they aren't stupid they understand the gravity of the situation and the long lasting effect it will have on the industry as a whole.

No one is coming out of this unscathed.
 

witheringsanity

New member
Aug 25, 2009
133
0
0
Kune35 said:
You know what WOULD have stopped PSN from being hacked? Having a firewall, or up to date security software. Sure, its not IMPOSSIBLE for XBL to be hacked, but it is almost infinitely more difficult since they actually use basic system security measures.
i dunno about "infinitely" more difficult, i'm sure the data could be quantified.