To woo a potential partner

Recommended Videos

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
Bobic said:
1. Huh, that was pretty funky, thanks. Don't know what to send back due to my poor knowledge of jazz music so here's Bruce Willis singing over some guy's poorly recorded clips of die hard 2: die harder. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9PVKCJV7Y8
For whatever reason, I was laughing hysterically before he started singing. Then I heard his voice, and I shut the hell up so I could enjoy it. He's actually pretty damned good. I'll never watch a Willis film the same way again, thank you.

2. The average person may think a lot more deeply than you expect.
I know it's pretty common for someone to think "my god, I'm the only person on earth capable of cognizant thought, surrounded by sheep". It's a narcissistic self-indulgence that I've certainly allowed myself to believe before, but I've since realized that it's far from the truth. I don't doubt that people are capable of self-analysis, and do so regularly, but what bothers me is the generation I grew up as a part of. People really don't like to be brutally, painfully honest with themselves. Well, few ever really have, but unfortunately, us nineties kids have a tendency to explain away our flaws as someone else's fault, and refuse to take responsibility for any of one's own shortcomings, regardless of how much they are at fault for it. It usually leads to us developing a force-field of self-absorbed denial, and therefore, severe (and sometimes even deliberate) misinterpretations of one's own desires and feelings. That part comes from experience, not speculation.

3. No that wasn't what I was saying. My point was that you look at the negatives and say that they are proof that love is an illusion, I look at the positives and say love is real (well that's vaguely connected to my original point anyway). Maybe we are both right, but for different people.
You've got a fair point. Perhaps this is one of those truths that will always remain subjective. However, what I've seen it do to people who believe in it a little too much scares me. Can't say I was too thrilled with my own experience, but I'm hardly going to base a thesis on my experience alone, since everything tends to be a little warped when I'm involved.

4. Couldn't people's own personal experiences count as proof?
That's a question that's open to plenty of interpretation. My first instinct is that it does not qualify as empirical evidence, but then again, love can't be quantified or measured. It's hard to prove or disprove an unmeasurable idea.

5. Fair enough
I must give you credit for being a gentleman about this. I can't count the number of times I've entered a debate, only to be offered relentlessly contrary points of view, just for the sake of being contradictory.
 

rsvp42

New member
Jan 15, 2010
897
0
0
SODAssault said:
love is a lie
I'm paraphrasing...

I know you're already having a back-and-forth with Bobic, but I wanted to offer my thoughts as well. Obviously you wouldn't agree with the Hollywood version of love, the happily ever after, whirlwind romance kind of love. But I don't think you should go so far as to swear off love and romance entirely. First off, you may never get laid. Secondly, I think it's probably better to take a more even-handed approach: make sure you find happiness and fulfillment in a way that doesn't depend on a woman, whether through your career, your family, your hobbies, etc. (I think it's important to be independent) But allow yourself to feel emotions and act on them. You maybe jaded by the media's depiction of love, but it doesn't mean you need to bottle anything up for the sake of pride.

It's important to remember that the media's version of love only exists because of something in reality. People fell in love before movies and commercial saturation. It may not have been the same beast it is today, but it was there. No sense throwing the baby out with the bathwater, as it were.
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,508
0
0
SODAssault said:
The idea that finding "that special someone" is a convenient story deliberately perpetuated to keep people content with their misery, telling them that eventually they'll find bliss and that life only seems like crap because they don't have it yet. "Just stick with your crappy job, pay your taxes, and keep the gun out of your mouth and you'll be rewarded and everything you've suffered for will be worth it, because there's someone out there for everyone, and you can't prove me wrong". Y'know, kinda like the promise of heaven.

Relationships and sex are just the opiate of the masses, and often go hand-in-hand with religion. I know of very few people that are genuinely happy in relationships, the rest just confuse their new, overwhelming feelings for happiness and fulfillment. Going through people one by one, trying to find that mythical "special someone" through trial and error with only a tenuous grasp of probability is setting yourself up for a world of hurt, which usually leads to trying to find happiness in severe compromise (i.e. well, at least you're not as bad as the last few, and I can tolerate you, so let's get married). Plus, the excessive hygiene and ridiculous amounts of interpersonal maintenance are a real drag. Besides, sex is an incredibly mild and watered-down high that is a million times more dangerous and risky than a spliff, and about half as enjoyable.

tl;dr focus on enjoying your life instead of being told what you need in order to be happy.
I have a feeling that he just wanted some relationship advice, not an essay on how we're all idiots living off of pipe dreams...

OT: Talking to her, maintaining a friendship with her for a week or two, then asking her if she's interested in going out with you.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
rsvp42 said:
The axeman snippeth.
That's a very fair perspective with several good points. Let me address it point-by-point.
You may never get laid.
Not a concern for me, and I've never been particularly thrilled by it. Some people obviously get a lot more out of it than me, but overall, I'd have to go with a saying I'd heard from a friend's grandfather: "There's nothing as overrated as sex, and nothing as underrated as a good, long shit." The only thing that changed when I lost my virginity was the knowledge that I hadn't been missing out on a whole lot.
Obviously you wouldn't agree with the Hollywood version of love, the happily ever after, whirlwind romance kind of love.
No, and it's probably because I've got a good sense of telling fact from fiction. While that's obviously an overly-dramatized, simplified and whimsical telling of it, it has unfortunately become a benchmark of sorts. An unrealistic one? Well, yeah, that goes without saying, but unfortunately, it seems to have become the standard for success, regardless. Hell, it seems like it's pretty much become the commonly-held example of what to expect, if casual observation of my Facebook wall is to be believed. However, I can't bring myself to agree with the more moderate definition, either, as it seems more like a romanticized rationalization than an objective stance. It's less unrealistic, yes, but in the same way that lead is less toxic than polonium: I still wouldn't recommend ingestion.
You maybe jaded by the media's depiction of love, but it doesn't mean you need to bottle anything up for the sake of pride.
Well, my reasons for avoiding relationships and all the feelings that come with them have less to do with being jaded or prideful, and more to do with being unimpressed with the initial experiences. They tended to be a lot of work for very little return, even when I was convinced that I was head-over-heels in love. Besides, the few times that I did completely open up ended very, very badly, and I learned a hard lesson in what should and should not be trusted to others. My emotional stability is no longer up for grabs. Again, I've got pretty rotten luck with everything having to do with being alive, so I'd be an idiot to make generalizations based on my own experiences.
It's important to remember that the media's version of love only exists because of something in reality. People fell in love before movies and commercial saturation. It may not have been the same beast it is today, but it was there.
Well, I'd say that the modern media's conception of love is less of an invention, and more of a tradition. People have been claiming to fall in love long before movies and commercial saturation, yes, and during those times, the definition has remained largely the same. Hell, if anything, I'd say it's been brought slightly down to earth, with the newer "get to know them, and once you've confirmed you have around ten things in common, BOOM! AUTOMATIC LOVE FOREVER, MARRY THEM IMMEDIATELY, YOU CLINGY, CO-DEPENDENT NIGHTMARE!" versus the older "if you're a woman and a man saves you from some sort of peril, BOOM! AUTOMATIC LOVE FOREVER, MARRY HIM IMMEDIATELY, YOU WEAK, HELPLESS WENCH!" Still, I'm hardly charmed as by either as the majority of people I know are.
No sense throwing the baby out with the bathwater, as it were.
Eh, well, I consider it a solution to the overpopulation crisis looming on the horizon.

SextusMaximus said:
I have a feeling that he just wanted some relationship advice, not an essay on how we're all idiots living off of pipe dreams...
Always happy to go the extra mile.
 

AdamRBi

New member
Feb 7, 2010
528
0
0
Step 1) Find out if she has any Evil Ex-Boyfriends.

Step 2) Fight and destroy them.

Step 3) You Win! (the Girl).That's how it works, right?
 

JohnSmith

New member
Jan 19, 2009
411
0
0
On topic: Yeah they are right, chat then ask out.

Off-topic: There is a clear answer hear SODAssault, Bobic its time you two went out on a date. It seems the easiest way to settle this dispute.
 

Marble Dragon

New member
Mar 11, 2009
352
0
0
In my experience, talking to various girls, there are three main categories guys should fit into to be appropriate partners: Nice, smart, and cute.

Nice: Be kind to people. Actually, do this one no matter what. If you're a dick, I'll be blunt: you're kind of screwed. I'm sure you aren't, though. Be kind to her and the people around her, and you should be fine.

Smart: I really can't help you with this one. Don't flaunt your intelligence, but don't hide it, either. I'm sure you have something you're good at and/or know something about that doesn't involve video games. (If she's a nerd, video game knowledge could be helpful, but I wouldn't count on it.)

Cute: Subjective to personal opinion. Bathe frequently, brush your hair, wash your face, ect. If she personally finds you attractive, then it can only help.

And then, once these bases are covered, (which you don't need to obsess too much about, unless you're a fat, ignorant dickwad), go talk to her. Talk about similar interests and her, and yourself if she asks. If your conversations show that she really might be into you, ask her out. Worst she can say is no.

Do remember that I've never actually wooed a girl, but I know a lot of them, and have heard about their romantic experiences. These are my best ideas here.
 

Hurray Forums

New member
Jun 4, 2008
397
0
0
Easy Street said:
You could try the indirect approach. It will take a little longer, but you will impress her in the long run.

First, find out where she lives. This is important as you will be observing her over the next 2 weeks. See if you can find a handy, sheltered spot relatively close by where you will be undisturbed. It doesn't have to be TOO close as you will be using binoculars.

Second, go shopping. You'll need: a set of dark clothing, a set of binoculars, and a notepad with a pen. If you already have this material, you're ahead of the game and can start right away.

Third, surveillance. Watch her and take notes. Accumulate as much knowledge as you can. The goal of this, of course, is to take a lot of the guesswork out of the picture. Imagine her pleasure and surprise when, during a conversation about likes and dislikes, you rattle off an extensive list of what she likes to do during the night, precisely.

Its all about smoothing over the bumps for an easier start to a lovely relationship.
I highly recommend this plan to anyone looking to find love. I tried it, and although I didn't get the girl, I did get a date with a fabulous orange jumpsuit and a giant man named Bubba. He's really sweet, and he totally didn't kill that girl, he was setup by the government those bastards.
 

fluffybunny937

New member
Jul 5, 2009
272
0
0
I can't really say anything on what but I do know what not to do.
Here's one of them. Sounding anything like this, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqXi8WmQ_WM
 

rsvp42

New member
Jan 15, 2010
897
0
0
SODAssault said:
--Your desire for sex, or lack thereof, is your deal, so I won't belabor that line of discussion.

--If anything, we can agree that this is quite definitely a subjective topic and anything said should be taken with a grain of opinionated salt. I think that love is possible and not simply a delusion. Are there many people who have a skewed idea of love? Are they deluded? Perhaps, but I don't think it means love itself is a lie, just that many people aren't letting themselves see it for what it is. I think real love is something humble, not something filled with rollercoasters of emotion and constantly inventive romance. Maybe "love" isn't a good word for it anymore, but whatever it is, it's there. We develop connections with our significant others and it's not always on the surface, but it's especially noticeable when the connection is severed. Perhaps the greatest evidence is a guy who's been dumped. He's not bent out of shape over happenstance, he's lost something real.

--I feel for you with your relationship troubles in the past. I can only speculate as to why you've been "unimpressed" with relationship stuff. I suppose personality plays a part, but you may have had unrealistic expectations. I'm not laying any fault on you, but sometimes we can't help what we expect from something. For instance, I'm moving soon and I have high expectations for the new city and how I might change, but I may be disappointed if I'm expecting too much. I can't really help what I expect, but I can't up and blame the city if it's not just the way I envisioned. Same idea. Obviously only you can choose what's right for you. But in my experience, choosing not to open up and to rely entirely on myself has actually caused more problems. In the past it's caused me to shut out women and end relationships prematurely. Your results may vary, and our goals are different, but I'm in a place where I need to actually be more vulnerable, oddly enough.

--You're getting a bit hyperbolic with your examples of what love is. Sure, there are "co-dependent nightmares" and "weak, helpless wenches" out there, but those situations aren't really what people are talking about when it comes to genuine love. We all get the concept of "settling" but falling in love, for all it's flaws in comparison to Hollywood love, is something else.
 

SeriousSquirrel

New member
Mar 15, 2010
698
0
0
Pretty sure that if you offered her the heart of dragon you slaughtered in the land ceredonia she couldn't say no. In fact, by most ciredonian standards she will be required to get married to you and bare you many children...

Also you could just talk to her, get to know her, be yourself/nice and ask her out eventually.
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
rsvp42 said:
--Your desire for sex, or lack thereof, is your deal, so I won't belabor that line of discussion.
Hardly unreasonable. I can't expect everyone to have the same libido. Not that I don't enjoy the occasional casual encounter, but I get far more mileage out of a certain wonderful plant that is experiencing a baffling prohibition in my country. By the way, I'm going to delve a little bit more into my own personal experiences, but keep in mind that my generalizations are based on far more than my own negative rides.

--If anything, we can agree that this is quite definitely a subjective topic and anything said should be taken with a grain of opinionated salt. I think that love is possible and not simply a delusion. Are there many people who have a skewed idea of love? Are they deluded? Perhaps, but I don't think it means love itself is a lie, just that many people aren't letting themselves see it for what it is.
To call it delusion would be a bit of a stretch. I certainly believe in the concept of love as an emotion, however, my skepticism lies with just how rewarding it actually is, and how unlikely you are to develop a healthy, mutual attachment to someone else.

Are there many people who have a skewed idea of love? Are they deluded? Perhaps, but I don't think it means love itself is a lie, just that many people aren't letting themselves see it for what it is. I think real love is something humble, not something filled with rollercoasters of emotion and constantly inventive romance.
Oh, certainly. I wouldn't, however, consider that phenomenon to be quite so harmless, however. The mainstream definition of love can lead to very dangerous expectations in people who don't know better (i.e. everybody who has never been in an involving relationship). It's sort of like the Gold Rush, way back when, where people set themselves up to be utterly destroyed when the exaggerations fall short. In fact, I've been there. My first relationship was founded on my incredibly naive notion that the only secret was to be empathic and caring, and you'd be solid. Got cheated on. Second relationship, tried the same thing. Cheated on again. I didn't end up hating women like most guys in my situation did, but I've lost both of my legs to that minefield, and I see no reason to go dragging my junk across the same field again, despite having several healthy relationships afterward that didn't get terribly serious. After all, the only consistent factor in all of my failed relationships: me.

Maybe "love" isn't a good word for it anymore, but whatever it is, it's there. We develop connections with our significant others and it's not always on the surface, but it's especially noticeable when the connection is severed. Perhaps the greatest evidence is a guy who's been dumped. He's not bent out of shape over happenstance, he's lost something real.
And that's why I'm out. Grew up with Avoidant Personality Disorder, which is characterized by crippling shyness and being utterly terrified of rejection, to the point of completely isolating myself from the rest of the world. Even though I've gained a hell of a lot of confidence since then, I'm still not quite as emotionally durable as the average male, which means that when I get cheated on and left for somebody else, my first reaction is to get completely hammered and go veering around town in my pickup, looking for something big to smash into. Obviously that's an extreme example, but I find it shocking that people would allow someone else to have that much control over them. People, by and large, are fickle, petty, and are quickly bored... not exactly traits that inspire faith in the idea of trusting them. I know the rebuttal is going to be "you're generalizing, there's genuinely good people out there, don't lump them in with the bad ones just because you met a few", but to be perfectly honest, I can see myself having to repeat this incredibly painful process over and over again, just to find that one person. It's like eating turd after turd in hopes of finding a brownie; even when you do find it, you've eaten a ton of shit and you still have an awful taste in your mouth that keeps you from fully enjoying the dessert.

Furthermore, I'm not sure that developing an attachment to anybody is necessarily wonderful or cause for celebration. With my personality type, I'm sort of like a plug, to everybody else's power strip. While everyone else is capable of providing an evenly-distributed amount of electricity (attention and affection), I sort of tend to just plug directly into one person and experience them as a tour-de-force, since I want to understand people, not just know them. For myself, and everybody like me, this leads to extreme levels of vulnerability, and often leaves us with absolutely no direction when we get cut loose.

--I feel for you with your relationship troubles in the past. I can only speculate as to why you've been "unimpressed" with relationship stuff. I suppose personality plays a part, but you may have had unrealistic expectations. I'm not laying any fault on you, but sometimes we can't help what we expect from something.
That's exactly what my problem was, and it's why I'm so quick to point out the bullshit factors to others. I'm not trying to rain on anybody's parade, I just want to tell people to watch for trip wires, because I think that love can pretty honestly be compared to a restaurant playground full of Claymore anti-personnel mines; I really don't mind if you want to run in and have fun and play on it, but I feel obligated to tell you to watch for trip wires, and that there's no need to feel pressured into going to cavort about in the explosive-filled plastic tunnels that smell vaguely of urine. I suppose the metaphor would be complete if that particular playground was advertised on television and pretty much played off as the mines being firecrackers in nearly every form of entertainment.

For instance, I'm moving soon and I have high expectations for the new city and how I might change, but I may be disappointed if I'm expecting too much. I can't really help what I expect, but I can't up and blame the city if it's not just the way I envisioned.
I wouldn't even try to argue with that. However, if you started a thread about tips for settling in to your soon-to-be residence in Tchernobyl, I'd be just as quick to point out all the inherent negatives and risks. That may be a bad analogy, though, because I'd probably end up asking you to take me along. That place is just so damned cool.


Same idea. Obviously only you can choose what's right for you. But in my experience, choosing not to open up and to rely entirely on myself has actually caused more problems.
Naturally, your mileage may vary. My own friends take advantage of me all the time, and people I've helped through incredibly difficult times forget I exist when I don't pester them. Plus, about half of my relationships have boiled down to "he's got money and affection, he'll be great to suck the life out of until I find someone I'm more attracted to". You could say it's left a lasting impression.


In the past it's caused me to shut out women and end relationships prematurely. Your results may vary, and our goals are different, but I'm in a place where I need to actually be more vulnerable, oddly enough.
Eh, well, I wouldn't discount the joys of autonomy and independence. Some people see walling yourself off from intimacy to be either unhealthy, cowardly or both, but I just see it as not touching the stove with my bare hands three times in a row.

--You're getting a bit hyperbolic with your examples of what love is. Sure, there are "co-dependent nightmares" and "weak, helpless wenches" out there, but those situations aren't really what people are talking about when it comes to genuine love. We all get the concept of "settling" but falling in love, for all it's flaws in comparison to Hollywood love, is something else.
Well, the hyperbolic statements were meant to represent the Hollywood definitions, so naturally, they're going to be exaggerated out the arse and back. While I'm sure that actual, real-world love can be wonderful, I've seen the false promise of it lure in a lot of people that ended up terribly as a result, far more often than I've seen anything remotely successful. Lots of kids I went to highschool with are getting married straight-away, and I'm seeing more and more of their relationships crumble as they come to terms with just how unrealistic they were being, and it leaves them in a very dark place. That alone is something that I feel I should be warning people about.
 

Bellvedere

New member
Jul 31, 2008
794
0
0
Lemon Detective said:
That is the strangest video I have seen in all my days...

:EDIT:
I have tried the talking to her thing, but I always run out of things to say.
Btw, I'm 16, and am pretty crappy at the whole relationship thing.
Ask her questions. Seriously. It's the best way to keep someone occupied in conversation. Keep them related to what she's talking about so it seems like you're interested in what she's saying, but don't ask boring questions because then she'll have to talk about it and you'll have to listen and everyone will regret that. Eventually you're bound to stumble across something that you can have a long winded debate and you'll be presented with a good opportunity to ask her out.

Don't just go up and ask her out of the blue though. That's strange and comes off way to eager. Talk first then "how about we finish this conversation over lunch sometime?"

Never go to the movies on a first date especially when you're not even a couple yet.

Keep it casual at first so that if it's awkward or you don't get along then no one is that hurt or embarrassed.

Good luck.
 

Valkyrie101

New member
May 17, 2010
2,300
0
0
Just thought of a little rhyme:

"Why woo, just tie and screw!"

It could work, you never know.
 

Frybird

New member
Jan 7, 2008
1,632
0
0
AdamRBi said:
Step 1) Find out if she has any Evil Ex-Boyfriends.

Step 2) Fight and destroy them.

Step 3) You Win! (the Girl).
It's sliiightly more complicated than that, read the sixth book.
 

BonsaiK

Music Industry Corporate Whore
Nov 14, 2007
5,635
0
0
Lemon Detective said:
I am looking for advice. I've recently met a girl I am rather fond of, but I don't know how to get her attention.

Can the Escapees lend me some advice?

I have tried the talking to her thing, but I always run out of things to say.
Btw, I'm 16, and am pretty crappy at the whole relationship thing.
Answered in the Relationship Problem thread, at the following link: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.117161-Relationship-problem-thread?page=43#7379911