TestECull said:
13: "Consoles are dumbing down PC games!" Negative. What's dumbing down PC games is PC gamers constantly buying the same boring, tedious, repetitive shooters. Balk at those games, refuse to buy them, only buy the games that aren't dumbed down, and you'll notice a change in games.
Correct conclusion, Incorrect reasoning.
It's the perception that PC games and Console games occupy the same space because of multiplatform releases. In the vast majority of multiplatform releases, it's the console version that gets the most attention during development; this is partly because PCs can backtrack down to consoles, performance-wise, while consoles are stuck where they are.
But mostly, it's because PC is 2nd fiddle in multiplatform launches; consoles are just a stronger market, and a more secure market for the big publishers. The only real incentive to do multiplatform publishing is to fill out the rest of the demand curve (economics talking).
Knowing this, if you see a multiplatform launch that includes PC, it will launch as a console game that happens to work on PC. This isn't supposition or interpretation; it's practical fact.
While not as popular to develop for in the mainstream, there are still PC-centric titles. On rare occasion, they get ported to consoles.
The reason your reasoning is incorrect is because these multiplatform titles still sell incredibly well on consoles; making any market adjustments or criticism from the PC gamers moot. PC gamers could stop buying these console ports tomorrow, and these games wouldn't budge an inch from their current development standards.
In short: If the developers were going to make two versions, they would make two distinct versions, but they don't, and the PC market isn't nearly strong enough to carry the weight to convince them to do so.
AND NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
OT: Of all the other points I see, only one really sticks out at me.
Failout 3.
I'll lay it out: I fucking hated Fallout 3. I despise that game. It's a very rare occasion where I feel cheated when I finish a game, but Fallout 3 managed it. I wouldn't even take it for free today.
Irrelevant ranting aside, I honestly feel that it didn't deserve any GOTY accolades, but to even bother arguing it is pointless; I'm not going to change anyone's mind, and unless they have the powers of time travel, they won't be able to undo my horrible experiences with the game either.
And this is coming from someone who didn't play a single minute of either of the original Fallout games before Fallout 3. So much for stereotypes, assumptions, and preconceptions, huh?