Top 5 worst games of 2012

Recommended Videos

Saladfork

New member
Jul 3, 2011
921
0
0
Well, let's see:

Diablo 3

I'm not even talking about the always on DRM, though that certainly made it much worse, but diablo 3 was a shitty game before it anyway. The game is shallow, there's no balance between the classes, the lag is horrendous, the story is retarded, and the way that they don't even try to disguise the auction house as a pay-to-win mechanic is just insulting.

WoW: Mists of Pandaria

Yeah, if you hadn't noticed I'm in a bit of a Blizzard-hating mood today. I'll give crdit where I figure it's due: The environment artists are brilliantly good at their jobs. The fact that they could make such beautiful worlds out of the WoW engine of all things is really quite impressive. That said... We're really scraping the bottom of the barrel now, aren't we? Pandaren? That one april fools joke? I kind of resent the fact that WoW even exists, even though I played it, because I loved warcraft 3, and as long as WoW is still going, they're never going to make a warcraft 4. Then again, if they made warcraft 4 now, it would probably turn out like diablo 3 and starcraft 2... and, indeed, mists of pandaria.

Also, on a personal note, they decided to put in monks. I hate monks. I hate their kung-fu bullshit, it's completely out of place in just about every setting they get crammed into, D&D included.

Also, why are we playing Pokemon now?

Assassin's Creed 3

I actually started giving up on the series when Revalations came out, though I figured AC3 might push through and entertain me the way AC2 did.

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnope.

I hope they take the sea battles, scrap everything else and go back to the drawing board making a pirate game (though knowing the AC team, it'd be a game in which you mostly collect watermelons and have bake-offs in Tortuga with maybe a good ship plundering every now and again).

Mass Effect 3

If you asked me last year what my favourite game series was, my answer would've been Mass Effect. Mass Effect 1 was probably the best game Bioware ever made, and 2 was pretty damn good in its' own right, but what made them great were, of course, the characters, the setting and the storytelling. The plot itself was pretty standard, but it was told extremely well, which is also a pretty good description for the original Star Wars trilogy, really.

And then, as with many of my favourite franchises, they ruined it. Utterly, and completely.

You all know why and you all know what. ME3 had some serious problems throughout the entire game, like the convenient crucible from nowhere, the utterly forgettable new characters (whats-his-face Vega, the one reporter played by the incompetant IGN writer, etc.), the bare-minimum lip service given to the characters from ME2 (Oh hey Jack! Oh... bye Jack), could go on, but anyway, my point is that I was willing to overlook all this shit because I loved the first two. Then the ending hit me, and suddenly, my love for the series gone, I looked back and thought of how much of ME3 was just so bad.

The worst part was when Bioware offered a single small hope, only for their 'extended cut' to kill the only two things I liked about the ending.

1) It definitavely ended the series, giving it a clearly defined beginning and ending, which I appreciate. It seemed to me like an attempt by the writers to avoid the dead-cow franchise milking that the extended cut ultimately allowed. Mass Effect 4? More like FUCK YOU BIOWARE. Yeah, I'm mad. What about it?

2) It was a very bleak, Phyrric victory at best and it was clear that, despite you winning, the galaxy was irrevocably changed, and probably not for the better. Then the extended cut came along and "fixed" that particular aspect. Happy endings for everyone! Guh. The fact that Bioware apparantly took the outrage over ME3's ending to mean that it wasn't 'happy' enough really disgusts me. Taking bets on how much drag age 3 is gonna sick!

Mass Effect 3 is not only my worst game of the year, but one of the worst games I've ever played period, because it made me angry. Most games, when I'm done, I may be somewhat annoyed by, or maybe just bored, but it's very rare for me to work up actual rage against a game. Also, it ruined two games I liked a lot. I am so done with Bioware, as is apparantly anyone who still had any kind of talent, including the founders.

Now, because I got myself pissed off again, I'm going to say my favourites, in no particular order.

Sins of a Solar Empire: Rebellion

Realy quite fun. I like having a little more diversity in the available technologies, and the new Titans and Corvettes add quite a lot to the game as well. For some reason I always seem to gravitate toward TEC rebels, probably because I kinda like the 'DIE ALIEN SCUM'-type lore behind it and partly because their titan is really cool.

Crusader Kings II

This was the first Paradox strategy game I played, and now I'm hooked. This is a medieval strategy game based more around dynasties than kingdoms; It's entirely possible to gain, and lose, entire empires through inheritance alone. The kind of politicking and plotting in this game is deceptively fun and I love every second of it.

XCOM-EU

Do I even need to say anything? This game is brilliant. Go play it if you haven't already.

Witcher 2

I'm counting this as a 2012 release because that's when the enhanced edition came out and that's when I bought it. I thought the game was impressive in both it's story and gameplay. I still haven't played the first one, after being scared away by tales of horrendous menues and impossible combat, but maybe I'll brave it one of these days.

Spec Ops: The Line

This! THIS! This is what you're all capable of doing! EA! Activision! Look at this! WHY AREN'T YOU LOOKING NO COME BACK WHAT IS THIS WARFIGHTER BULLSHIT
 

Eddie the head

New member
Feb 22, 2012
2,327
0
0
Andros83 said:
Get a spine, you are on the internet.
I can call anyone who enjoyed the objectively terrible nature of ME3 a paste eating retard just as i can easily proclaim that anyone that thinks Far Cry 3 is good to be a fool and the people who annually buy COD titles should be smacked in the face till they turn red.

And the stealth in Far Cry 3 isn't bad because of difficulty(far fucking from it seeing how piss easy and unsatisfying it is).
Its the fact that the AI is dumb as shit and will only notice you if its looking directly at you and you can easily break flow by tapping the F key 200 hundred times in a row.
The stealth isn't what cripples that waste of time either way.
I am amazed that I have to say this, but I guess it supports the idea that nothing goes without saying. Anyway how an objective thing effects someone is completely subjective. I don't mean to be rude but how do you not know that? Rap music in an objective sense is worse, in most cases, then Classical music. But it's better in a few. Such as a personal narrative, and lyrics. To me the things rap music is good at I don't care about, but no one is at fault for caring about those things more.

I'll bring up another example form video games. X Com is buggy as all hell, and that bothered me so much that I couldn't play it. But to some people it was just a passing "Oh it's got a few bugs." Objectively it is buggy, but doesn't mean people that can enjoy it despite the bugs have something wrong with there brain. And that's an objective fact.

Look you can loot at the world in this narrow view as much as you want, I'm not going to stop you. I will say this though I lost all respect for your opinion, and I doubt I am the only one. If you continue to look at the world with such a narrow viewpoint you are going to lose a lot of other people's respect as well. You might say you don't care , and if that's the case why did you bother to tell us your opinion in the first place? If no one can take you opinion with any creditably then there is no use in stating it. I guess I should say in a rational discussion, if you are just trying to piss people off then I guess it works.
 

That Annoying Guy

New member
Feb 21, 2012
121
0
0
Don't you think it's a cheap shot to put an indie game on the list, nevermind it being number one. Though i do agree with all the others though.
 

JackandTom

New member
Nov 17, 2010
603
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
So, what game is even worse than Assassin's Creed 3? What game is more boring, more putrid than the excruciating badness that was Assassin's Creed 3?
http://i.imgur.com/pGChc.gif

THOSE BE FIGHTING WORDS! Assassin's Creed is not bad by any stretch of the imagination, the hate for an indie game like Dead Pixels just seems odd.
 

crono738

New member
Sep 4, 2008
550
0
0
OldDirtyCrusty said:
Andros83 said:
Blah, blah, blah FarCry3 sucks because i say so,blah, blah, blah
Think of the game whatever you want but don`t come down on others who had fun with it. I`m still amazed how someone could have trouble with the stealthsystem of FC3. Don`t run, use cover and bushes, use your knife and bow it isn`t that hard to figure out maybe you`ll get it one day (or not since you already wrote the game off).
Just ignore him. I'm starting to think that Zeel decided to come make another account just so he could troll everyone again.
 

Blaster395

New member
Dec 13, 2009
514
0
0
No point going for the triple A releases. Those games are not the worst. They may merely be mediocre, but they are not appaling. I went straight to the most bland, unimaginitive, games ever, the genre that entirely consists of retextures of the same game and exists for the sole purpose of sucking money out of people, with game mechanics not focused on being a game, but instead being focused on forcing you to spam your 'friends' to progress.

Triple A can be shit. These games go a step beyond towards being exploitative.

5. Something Zynga released
4. A 'social' game that was released by someone who isn't zynga and tried to copy zynga.
3. A 'social' game that zynga copied from someone else.
2. Shovelware on the wii.
1. A 'social' game that pisses on a previously great franchise.
 
Nov 28, 2007
10,686
0
0
ITT: A lot of people misunderstanding what the word "objectively" means. Objective is saying "Human blood, when it hits air, is red". That is inarguable fact. "This game sucks" is not objective, it's subjective. Saying Mass Effect 3 is a bad game is subjective, not objective. Now, saying something along the lines of "Mass Effect 3 has its share of glitches and storyline contradictions" is, in fact, objective, as you can pull up evidence to support those claims. But saying "This game is objectively bad" is a contradiction of terms.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
You guys couldn't do edgy even if your lives depended on it.

90% of the listed games here are simply mediocre. Steel battalion is the rare shitty exception that goes beyond normal crap.
 

Baron von Blitztank

New member
May 7, 2010
2,133
0
0
5) Asura's Wrath
4) Borderlands 2
3) Transformers: Fall of Cybertron
2) BlazBlue Continuum Shift EXTEND
1) Assassin's Creed 3

Yeah... I've only played 5 games that were released last year.
 

Andros83

New member
Apr 26, 2011
14
0
0
thebobmaster said:
ITT: A lot of people misunderstanding what the word "objectively" means. Objective is saying "Human blood, when it hits air, is red". That is inarguable fact. "This game sucks" is not objective, it's subjective. Saying Mass Effect 3 is a bad game is subjective, not objective. Now, saying something along the lines of "Mass Effect 3 has its share of glitches and storyline contradictions" is, in fact, objective, as you can pull up evidence to support those claims. But saying "This game is objectively bad" is a contradiction of terms.
Its objectively bad because its controls in combat are contradictory.
That alone makes it a mess.

Lets count the number of inputs tied to what was in my case the spacebar.

-Enter cover
-Exit cover
-Tactical roll
-Sprint
-Slide over cover
-Mount over cover
-Pick up item
-Switch from point to point

Control in ME3 is botched and this point was even mentioned in multiple reviews the gaming press decided to whore out their near perfect scores.
This isn't even mentioning the atrocious decision of universal ammo.
It was a bad decision in Mass Effect 2 as well as Invisible War and time hasn't done much to improve it.
Not to mention the glitches surrounding said ammo preventing you from actually picking it up


You want objectivity?
Well here it fucking is.
Those who defend such design can easily be classified as imbeciles as far as i care
Mass Effect 3 is a bad game.

But you know what?
It still wasn't the worst game i played last year.
That honor went to Resident Evil 6.
 

Iwata

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,333
0
0
Phoenixmgs said:
That's not an excuse for having a bad campaign but the CODs, BFs, and MoHs are made with multiplayer as the main mode.
... now. They're made with multiplayer as the main mode, now. I started buying them waaaaaaaay, way back when they weren't (I'm sure I still have the first MoH game around here somewhere), and it's a habit that I found hard to drop. However, Black Ops 2 was the first CoD game I didn't buy on release, and in fact still don't own, so hey... maybe there's hope for me yet.
 

ecoho

New member
Jun 16, 2010
2,093
0
0
it seems people have forgot that duke nukum forever was released last year........
 

The Last Nomad

Lost in Ethiopia
Oct 28, 2009
1,426
0
0
Having only played one game that came out this year that I didn't like I'm gonna hafta go with a short list of one game...
and that is Dishonored. It was such a boring game filled with little bits of greatness that weren't explored enough and over-run by the fact that the game really wanted you to play it it's way rather than letting you decide how to play.
 

The Last Nomad

Lost in Ethiopia
Oct 28, 2009
1,426
0
0
Andros83 said:
thebobmaster said:
ITT: A lot of people misunderstanding what the word "objectively" means. Objective is saying "Human blood, when it hits air, is red". That is inarguable fact. "This game sucks" is not objective, it's subjective. Saying Mass Effect 3 is a bad game is subjective, not objective. Now, saying something along the lines of "Mass Effect 3 has its share of glitches and storyline contradictions" is, in fact, objective, as you can pull up evidence to support those claims. But saying "This game is objectively bad" is a contradiction of terms.
Its objectively bad because its controls in combat are contradictory.
That alone makes it a mess.

Lets count the number of inputs tied to what was in my case the spacebar.

-Enter cover
-Exit cover
-Tactical roll
-Sprint
-Slide over cover
-Mount over cover
-Pick up item
-Switch from point to point

Control in ME3 is botched and this point was even mentioned in multiple reviews the gaming press decided to whore out their near perfect scores.
This isn't even mentioning the atrocious decision of universal ammo.
It was a bad decision in Mass Effect 2 as well as Invisible War and time hasn't done much to improve it.
Not to mention the glitches surrounding said ammo preventing you from actually picking it up


You want objectivity?
Well here it fucking is.
Those who defend such design can easily be classified as imbeciles as far as i care
Mass Effect 3 is a bad game.

But you know what?
It still wasn't the worst game i played last year.
That honor went to Resident Evil 6.
Thats gotta be the worst example of 'objectivity' I've heard in a long time.
YOU found it difficult to control the character... Which means you can at best claim the controls are bad. That does not make it a bad game. I've heard a lot of other things that would support that, but one thing like that is not enough to declare ME3 an undeiably bad game. I've never played it so I dunno how good/bad it is, but that control scheme of all those functions to one button worked well in Mass Effect 2. So again, the 'bad' controls are just your subjective opinion.
 

upgrayedd

New member
Sep 2, 2012
73
0
0
5-Never Dead-I like the idea, However the controls undermine the game, I wanted to like it, however it's freaking hard to get it to do what you want it to do

4-Warfighter-urg, very Buggy, Lame bravado go team America Bullshit, story was pieced together in 20 minutes, and looks like the same amount of time was used to check for bugs.

3-War z- Im glad they pulled it from Steam, Sham of a game, Poorly pieced together and it cost like 20 dollars, It felt like i was robbed. The best thing which happened was it was pulled.

2-Amy-It's a broken game, At least with half the whinging about how you did not find games fun the controls would function, This was a luxuary in this game, Lets hear you ***** about a bad port of Dark SOuls once you've had 20 minutes of Amy

1-Steel Batalion-I couldnt get out of a fucking tank for like 3 minutes, After that i was tired and played more Xcom, 5 Hours of Xcom seemed a shorter time then those 3 minutes of me trying to do stuff in Steel Batalion.

Thread needs to be re-named "Biggest Let-downs of 2012" Not worst games, paperboy sounds like he does not enjoy video games.

In No way shape or form is Mass effect 3/Diablo 3/Farcry 3/Walking Dead Bad games, They were not unplayable, You still enoyed them Up to a point, because you get upset with an ending/does not stack up to previous titles in the series/Dont like click and point/I dont like action buttons i want 30000 buttons on my controler. so it's bad doesn't mean they are Bad games, Dissapointing yeah, Cop out endings or lack of vision to keep your intrest. There are games which have been released which are technically broken (Amy/Steel Batallion/War Z) Which people have paid MONEY for
 

hazabaza1

Want Skyrim. Want. Do want.
Nov 26, 2008
9,612
0
0
JackandTom said:
hazabaza1 said:
So, what game is even worse than Assassin's Creed 3? What game is more boring, more putrid than the excruciating badness that was Assassin's Creed 3?
THOSE BE FIGHTING WORDS! Assassin's Creed is not bad by any stretch of the imagination, the hate for an indie game like Dead Pixels just seems odd.
Feel free to try and convince me but I doubt it'll work.

And I'll hate on an indie game because it's a shitty indie game. A very shitty one.
 

Iwata

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,333
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
And I'll hate on an indie game because it's a shitty indie game. A very shitty one.
I agree. As much as I love and respect indie developers, there seems to be a certain reluctance to say their games suck. Hell, I hated Braid and I'm not afraid to say so.
 

Tom_green_day

New member
Jan 5, 2013
1,384
0
0
I only played 3 games that were released this year, i prefer preowned. My worst of the 3 would be Black Ops 2. I don't like the CoD games but really enjoyed every aspect of the original aspect. This led me on just to lead me feeling betrayed
My second worst would be Far Cry 3. It was a good game but exploration wasn't really necessary and they removed some of the cool features from Far Cry 2. I believe it wasn't as good as the reviews made out.
My best worst is Mass Effect 3. Once you stfu about the ending the rest of the game is really enjoyable, not to mention the multiplayer is fun and addictive in my opinion.
However if you turn the list the other way around you get my 3 best games of 2012, with ME3 being my favourite.
 

OldDirtyCrusty

New member
Mar 12, 2012
701
0
0
crono738 said:
Just ignore him. I'm starting to think that Zeel decided to come make another account just so he could troll everyone again.
I`ll do that. No need for furhter comments and going off topic much longer. I`m a noob here and haven`t had the "pleasure" to meet Zeel and Andros posts are quite funny since he`s such a tough guy.

Max Payne3 multiplayer - This is one of my favorite games this year but i couldn`t get into the mp. Bullet time in mp sounded like a dream come true and the vendetta system is a cool idea. I tried and tried, i had good runs, i had bad runs, it didn`t matter, it just wasn´t fun. The developer tools instead of a mp would have been better.