Tracer #Buttgate - Shots fired by professional cosplayer at Heroes Championships

Recommended Videos

F-I-D-O

I miss my avatar
Feb 18, 2010
1,095
0
0
It's not a "gate." This is nothing like Watergate. It's a controversy (albeit a silly one). Not everything that causes an argument needs the suffix gate.

Blizzard wasn't censored. A game in development got changed. People working on it were already wary about it, and someone pointing a finger saying "this is weird," a developer agreeing "yep, we thought so to" and then editing the game isn't censorship. It's validation for the creative teams feelings. The internet doesn't have the bible of every character's arc, background, and motivations. Blizzard's likely still writing it through this process.

Now, a cosplayer hired by Blizzard striking it at the event just seems weird. Yeah, I get wanting to do whatever poses you want to in costume, but it just isn't the best time. In addition, it doesn't show anything additional. We already know the pose looks good on Tracer's model and costume - it was already in engine and animated. But one ten second clip of a cosplayer != the sum total of the characters actions and motivations.
Blizzard's likely in the final pages of deciding how they want to present their characters. Every aspect builds to that. Undermining your bosses effort to clarify the character you dress as seems disingenuous, imo. Weird place and time to protest.

Or the actor was told to do that by Blizzard to bring more attention to the surrounding event, using a wave of idotic controversy to generate more interest in HotS and Overwatch simultaneously. Would also serve as a nice end note - those complaining an unreleased game got changed thing they won, anyone else just doesn't care what.

CritialGaming said:
It is also funny that Tracer falls to the ground and we get a nice big look at the fine ass in the latest Blizzard cinematic. It's okay to show that ass in the movie, but take it out of the game! Guess they don't care about showing Tracer's ass, so long as she isn't showing it on purpose.
Aw man, it's as if surrounding context was the entire point of the initial complaint and pose removal. It's almost like taking things out of context can cause misrepresentations of the intended purpose. But, surely every time a character's ass has ever been on camera has the exact same intended purpose. /s
 

Dragonbums

Indulge in it's whiffy sensation
May 9, 2013
3,307
0
0
tippy2k2 said:
Well I hope her protesting what has to be the silliest "controversy" I think I've seen in a long while was worth it. I imagine Blizzard is not terribly happy about that.

I suppose maybe this cosplayer feels so strongly about it that they're willing to take that hit but this has got to be one of the strangest hills I've seen so many people want to die on (and we've seen some pretty stupid freaking hills lately...)
Eh, I'd rather die on this hill than the mess that was Nintendo editing out Lins nipnops and crotch in Xenoblade so you couldn't put sex lingerie on her.
 

Areloch

It's that one guy
Dec 10, 2012
623
0
0
This entire thing, on both sides, can be summed up as:

"I'm allowed to disagree with whatever I want, but no one's allowed to disagree with my disagreement!"

at this point.
 

infohippie

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,369
0
0
Areloch said:
This entire thing, on both sides, can be summed up as:

"I'm allowed to disagree with whatever I want, but no one's allowed to disagree with my disagreement!"

at this point.
I don't agree. :D
 

Wrex Brogan

New member
Jan 28, 2016
803
0
0
Eacaraxe said:
Wrex Brogan said:
Honestly after years of dealing with the World of Warcraft Community, they're probably used to people picking stupid hills to die on. Slight balance changes often resulted in hundred-page threads about how they're 'ruining the game', so people getting up in arms over something like this is just usual business for 'em, really.
Has it occurred to you that, for many people who put dozens if not hundreds of hours into a single character, a "slight balance" change can and will ruin the game for them? Especially when you take into consideration how needlessly min-max obsessed the WoW community is in general, something as simple as a 1% shift in DPS or eHP can change entire raid comps and leave swaths of the player base entirely out in the cold.

Remember in BC when Blizzard stuck a cooldown on BoSac? The paladin community -- at least those in the paladin community who knew what the fuck they were talking about -- were in open revolt. The rest of the community, including the stupid paladin players, went on and on playing down the potential ramifications of that "slight" balance change. And, when it went live, every paladin build in the game in PvP and PvE (especially PvP) alike got kicked straight in the nads, some to complete inexistence, since no-cooldown BoSac was the difference between viability (genuine viability, not tryhard min-max "viability") and respeccing.
...Well that's needlessly hostile.

And no, see, the problem is it's damn near every change that Blizzard does causes players to run riot. Good and bad. So many. So, so many. Yes, some of them have been about actual shitty changes - shockingly I don't agree with every change (really? Fury Warriors take extra damage during Enrage? Who the fuck thought that was a good idea?) - but the thing is, everything sets the users of Battle.net off. EVERYTHING.

Which is why Blizzard isn't... really fussed about these kinds of things. An explosive outrage across multiple sites and generating hundreds of pages of threads is like... the least-likely thing to change their mind. Because they see it all the time. It's standard operation from their users. People standing upon their chosen hills going 'This Patch, This Patch is where I chose to fight and Die!' is met by Blizzard with a shrug.

Outrage is a useful tool. Just... not when it's the only tool a community provides.

Houseman said:
RE: "This is a silly hill"

People who are fighting this war need to post up on all the hills they can, because if they don't, there eventually won't be any hills left to defend.
...This isn't a war. You're not noble soldiers fighting a terrible foe.

You're getting mad about changes developers are making in their own video games.

Please, step back for five minutes.
 

Dragonlayer

Aka Corporal Yakob
Dec 5, 2013
971
0
0
Oh way to go Miss C. Player, now everyone in the audience who has a daughter is doomed to watch their beloved offspring be corrupted into a monstrous temptress of barely repressed sexual menace.

EDIT

Argh! What happened to my avatar!?
 

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
Ok how is this such a massive controversy? Why are we complaining about this minor change but things like Day one DLC, micro-transactions and botched ports aren't worth talking about now?

Also can some one please provide evidence that the OP that started this whole thing was a troll post or is this just conjecture?
 

Bat Vader

Elite Member
Mar 11, 2009
4,997
2
41
I kinda agree about the pose. I feel like it wasn't sexy enough. They should do a new one where she's just completely nude. Also, give her a bigger ass. That ass on that character is flatter than a pancake that Godzilla stepped on. Make it jiggle when she moves.
 

TravelerSF

New member
Nov 13, 2012
116
0
0
Loop Stricken said:
It's pretty damn silly, really...

Yeah, I couldn't help but notice that in the new short too. The more this goes on, the more it seems like a misguided effort. At this point I'd be fairly confident to say that the problem wasn't about the pose to begin with. The problem was the character model, which made the pose look much more sexual than intended. I suppose the pants are designed after the ones that runners use, which does fit her character, but they're so skin tight that combined with her body model you're bound to have a few "sexual" poses if you're willing to look for them.
 

DudeistBelieve

TellEmSteveDave.com
Sep 9, 2010
4,771
1
0
....This counts as a CM Punk level pipe bomb these days?

Jesus someone get a shovel, because the bar is so low it's actually underground.
 

Wolf Hagen

New member
Jul 28, 2010
161
0
0
Butt.... Gate..... BUTTGATE!?!

Now I don't wonder anymore, how "President Trump" might be a possible Scenario in such a world.
 

Phasmal

Sailor Jupiter Woman
Jun 10, 2011
3,676
0
0
You know you guys can just.. google butts if you want to see butts.

I had no idea butts were that important to you guys. Blizzard changed a thing, guys, it's okay. I know you guys are used to being the targeted audience who gets listened to all the time, but sometimes they're gonna do stuff you don't like.

I mean, I've even seen guys say they won't buy Overwatch now because of this. But they clearly didn't really want it and weren't going to play it in the first place. Fake gamer guys, eh.
 

Silentpony_v1legacy

Alleged Feather-Rustler
Jun 5, 2013
6,760
0
0
But wait...she's a model. Paid to model.

And she models.

How is that 'showing Blizzard what for!'?

And she doesn't even do the pose! She just stands there, like an idiot who forget her lines were in a completely different language than the national standard.

Look, I ain't against the protest, but this is a reinforcement as much as John Oliver's latest video is. In that, no. No its not.
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
Redryhno said:
Reed Spacer said:
Dreiko said:
Internalised buttsogyny, can't asscape it, the only recourse is to turn the other cheek.
Yeah.

She rectum.

No, I'm not apologizing.
Good to see the internet still knows how to jump on a good bunch of buns.
We have to be careful not to take it too fart though.

[sub][sub][sub]Did I do it right?[/sub][/sub][/sub]