Well, I could careless about the multi-player. I've played better multi-player in other shooters and it all ends up being the same regardless. Plus, the COD franchise has become something like the Madden series: "Let's release a new game every year, change a couple things here and there but not do anything new and we'll get everybody's money. Again!!!" It's not a superior shooter, at least in my opinion. Will this new Battlefield outsell Modern Warfare? Unfortunately, no. And that's depressing.CardinalPiggles said:I think that looks amazing, but graphics aren't everything are they...
That's a good one, good luck with that.Eric Welty said:Call of Duty...Meet your demise.
Unless the multi player is as fast paced and fun as MW1, it won't stand a chance.
I didn't play BC2's multi-player, but at least it's story was a heck of a lot better and more engaging than MW2. BF3 already looks better than MW3.Withard said:BC2 Multiplayer is already better im afraid.CardinalPiggles said:I think that looks amazing, but graphics aren't everything are they...
That's a good one, good luck with that.Eric Welty said:Call of Duty...Meet your demise.
Unless the multi player is as fast paced and fun as MW1, it won't stand a chance.
Building destruction? No RETARDED "supah powers to you coz you farmin!" idiocy and constantly changing battlefield locations (Building wise)