Trailers: Call of Duty: Black Ops Multiplayer Customization

Recommended Videos

Torque669

New member
Apr 21, 2009
1,204
0
0
Definatly looks awesome. Ill be spending hours creating a nice logo for my self :)

However ... WHY DOGS!? WHY!?
 

Kellerb

New member
Jan 20, 2009
882
0
0
Never thought id feel sorry for Infinity Ward. but i do. this will kick a large quantity of full bodied arse.
 

Javex

New member
Mar 15, 2010
92
0
0
Uhhh...... Well, I wasn't gonna buy this after Modern Warfare 2 let me down. But between this and the wager mode, it looks pretty damn good. I'll still wait, though. In the meantime I'll just play MoH and Bad Company 2: Vietnam.
 

Timbydude

Crime-Solving Rank 11 Paladin
Jul 15, 2009
958
0
0
Customization is good and all, but the actual gameplay I saw in that trailer is more or less directly ripped from MW2. The interfaces looked almost identical, as did everything else about the game.

It seems like only Infinity Ward (R.I.P.) was able to actually advance the series at all (which makes sense, since they created it). Just like World at War, it looks like Treyarch is just taking the same exact formula and applying a new coat of paint.
 

Korten12

Now I want ma...!
Aug 26, 2009
10,766
0
0
Timbydude said:
Customization is good and all, but the actual gameplay I saw in that trailer is more or less directly ripped from MW2. The interfaces looked almost identical, as did everything else about the game.

It seems like only Infinity Ward (R.I.P.) was able to actually advance the series at all (which makes sense, since they created it). Just like World at War, it looks like Treyarch is just taking the same exact formula and applying a new coat of paint.
why fix what isn't broken? The UI is fine, no need to change, and the gameplay is fine.
 

Timbydude

Crime-Solving Rank 11 Paladin
Jul 15, 2009
958
0
0
Korten12 said:
why fix what isn't broken? The UI is fine, no need to change, and the gameplay is fine.
As much as I love MW2, this game seriously looks like it offers nothing new, save for the new setting.

Though I hate comparing these series because they're quite different, just take a look at what changed from Halo 3 to Halo: Reach:
-Addition of daily and weekly challenges.
-Earning credits, with which you can (superficially) customize your character
-Seamless online integration between all modes of play
-Armor abilities (these introduce a completely new facet of gameplay)
-Revamped combat system that combines various aspects of the previous games, but feels rather new.

That is the type of evolution I like to see in a series. To me, Black Ops is to Modern Warfare 2 what New Vegas is to Fallout 3. Black Ops and New Vegas will probably both be good games, and they'll sell absurdly well. But, they're both being made by "secondary" companies that are really just trying to replicate the success of the previous entry (made by a superior developer) by playing it safe. (Yes, I'm aware that certain members of Obsidian created the Fallout franchise, but with the newest game they're making it almost identical to Fallout 3, which they didn't create.)

More of the same is fine as long as it's a little bit different. But taking MW2 and reskinning it is a different story entirely.
 

Silver Patriot

Senior Member
Aug 9, 2008
867
0
21
Caradinist said:
With currency, you can now currency currency. Currency allows you to currency that currency, giving you unlimited choices for your currency.

Really though, it's nice that it's giving players more choices for customization. It means they'll pick the "coolest", brightest stuff so they get themselves shot quicker.
HEY! Hot Pink is where it's at. Just ask my Spartan.
 

SalamanderJoe

New member
Jun 28, 2010
1,378
0
0
Ha! I was about to say the COD points system was like a rip-off from Reach...and then all of that personal touch possible. Yeah Reach can disapear into my cupboard for a while...
 

Korten12

Now I want ma...!
Aug 26, 2009
10,766
0
0
joebear15 said:
Korten12 said:
Timbydude said:
Customization is good and all, but the actual gameplay I saw in that trailer is more or less directly ripped from MW2. The interfaces looked almost identical, as did everything else about the game.

It seems like only Infinity Ward (R.I.P.) was able to actually advance the series at all (which makes sense, since they created it). Just like World at War, it looks like Treyarch is just taking the same exact formula and applying a new coat of paint.
why fix what isn't broken? The UI is fine, no need to change, and the gameplay is fine.
I loved MW2 but if you think that the gameplay on mw2 was NOT broken you were not paying attention enough while playing the multi.
I think your mixing up balance and gameplay.
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
That's a helluvahlot of customization, very extensive.

I'm still not going to buy it. I cannot, and will not, support Activision no matter what the game is (Thank you, Mr. Kotick). I might be missing out on a great game, but I can live with that with a few other great games on the horizon (LBP2, Gran Turismo 5, Dead Space 2, New Vegas, etc...)

However, to those who are going to get the game, I hope you enjoy it. No reason why you shouldn't get a good game to play with.
 

runedeadthA

New member
Feb 18, 2009
437
0
0
This actually looks.....really really really good.....Dammit.

I was all set to spend my limited funds on crysis 2, but now.... Jaysus.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
JourneyThroughHell said:
BritishWeather said:
Looks great! I can't wait for the full co-op reveal
There won't be any, sorry to dissapoint you. Only the Zombie mode.

I went and double-checked that, and there officially won't be a coop campaign.
But don't forget the "practice" mode you can play with friends as another form of co-op.
 

C4N4DUCK18

New member
Jun 9, 2010
61
0
0
A quick look at the video and I saw SAM turrets. This just keeps surprising me! I hope they don't show all the little neat add ons and features. I want to find new things on my own (like beating Halo:Reach on Legendary, alone... and for the first time...).