Trailers: GoldenEye 007
- Thread starter Team Hollywood
- Start date
Recommended Videos
HEY GUISE! No one's played it yet, so let's all say it's a bad game that should feel bad, even though none of us have seen anything more than a few trailers! That way, we can all feel extra smug when our friends buy it and it turns out to be pretty decent, despite our predictions!
YEEEAAAAH!
YEEEAAAAH!
You, sir, win at the internet for life.thenumberthirteen said:Dear ReiverCorrupterReiverCorrupter said:
In answer to your question they offered me a vast sum of money, and, to be honest, I needed it. I was in TOMB RAIDER for God's sake! And did I get a sex scene with Angelina Jolie? Did I fuck. Now I've got more money and ass than I know what to do with. If they want to remake James Bond, and pay me by the fistful then let them. I've got my pick of classy Oscar bait roles now, and even if they replace me I can ride the whole 007 ticket for the rest of my career. Sean Connery was just some git with a Scottish accent, now he's been knighted, and it sure as hell wasn't for Highlander II.
If the studio wants to save on gadgets and hollowed out Volcano lair sets then that's fine and dandy by me. Also if they don't want to dye my locks then that just means I don't have to spend an hour in Makeup with tinfoil in my hair while someone touches up my roots.
Also a lot of people have tried to stop Matt Damon, but to be honest he throws such good Wrap parties that, to be honest, it's worth just sticking him in movies. You should try his Potato Salad, its to die for.
Hugs and Kisses
Daniel Craig
P.S. To thank you for your helpful career advice here's a signed picture of myself looking smug.
Personally, I will get this game, and love the hell out of it. I loved (and still play) the original GoldenEye, and, while this is different, at least they are making an EFFORT.
If you wanted a port of the original, why not just play the original? I understand some of you might not have it anymore, but what's stopping you from going to a swap meet, and buying a ~$10 used copy?
Second, just because Craig is in it doesn't automatically make it bad. Sure, I would have LIKED to see Brosnan there, but his likeness is trademarked (or something) by HIM. And Brosnan did not want to return to the 007 series. Besides that, as others before me have said, Craig did not make Bond "gritty", the writers/producers did. Craig just plays him.
Third, there is a reason why the game is a Wii exclusive, and why it is VERY different from the original. The original GoldenEye was a N64 EXCLUSIVE. Nintendo has SOME rights to it. However, Rare made the game, but is now owned by Microsoft. Nintendo and Microsoft would have both released a port of GoldenEye, but Nintendo would get the original, while Microsoft would get an HD port. Not to mention, the rights to the 007 game franchise belonged to EA, and now to Activision. Just getting GoldenEye out again is a freakin' miracle. Of course, Rare owns the levels of the original, so Eurocom can't just do those levels.
All in all, I'm gonna get this game. It looks fun to play, and a good game in its own right.
If you wanted a port of the original, why not just play the original? I understand some of you might not have it anymore, but what's stopping you from going to a swap meet, and buying a ~$10 used copy?
Second, just because Craig is in it doesn't automatically make it bad. Sure, I would have LIKED to see Brosnan there, but his likeness is trademarked (or something) by HIM. And Brosnan did not want to return to the 007 series. Besides that, as others before me have said, Craig did not make Bond "gritty", the writers/producers did. Craig just plays him.
Third, there is a reason why the game is a Wii exclusive, and why it is VERY different from the original. The original GoldenEye was a N64 EXCLUSIVE. Nintendo has SOME rights to it. However, Rare made the game, but is now owned by Microsoft. Nintendo and Microsoft would have both released a port of GoldenEye, but Nintendo would get the original, while Microsoft would get an HD port. Not to mention, the rights to the 007 game franchise belonged to EA, and now to Activision. Just getting GoldenEye out again is a freakin' miracle. Of course, Rare owns the levels of the original, so Eurocom can't just do those levels.
I am afraid for this game. Ever since the original GoldenEye was released, the newer 007 games have constantly been compared to GoldenEye. Even the great 007 games, like Nightfire, have had reviews end with "It's great, but it's no GoldenEye". Now that a GoldenEye game has been released, I am afraid reviews are going to murder this game.
All in all, I'm gonna get this game. It looks fun to play, and a good game in its own right.
It looks awesome. Oh dear lord it looks awesome! But will it be as well-remembered and have as historic a legacy as GoldenEye 64? I doubt it.
Make more movies like Layer Cake and Munich. Quit with the Golden Compass and Tintin fare.
- Your fan
AvsJoe
Dear Daniel Craig,thenumberthirteen said:
Make more movies like Layer Cake and Munich. Quit with the Golden Compass and Tintin fare.
- Your fan
AvsJoe
Considering all the games that lack splitscreen, that would have had it five years ago, I'd say it's enough to base an entire game around. Why the fuck would I want to play faceless strangers over this whole Internet-thingy, when I can have ten times more fun playing the game with friends in my own couch?harvz said:
