I would play the crap out of that DLC!!!!Casual Shinji said:The only thing that would ever make me touch that game again is a Bravestarr DLC.steeple said:well this...... does not look that good actually....
having played RDR just to find it too repetitive and boring, I dont think zombies are whats missing (also, why the hell zombies?! why not werewolfs? that could be intresting indeed)
Beside this being awesome in its own way, I think that zombies are at the same level if it comes to DLC XDCasual Shinji said:The only thing that would ever make me touch that game again is a Bravestarr DLC.steeple said:well this...... does not look that good actually....
having played RDR just to find it too repetitive and boring, I dont think zombies are whats missing (also, why the hell zombies?! why not werewolfs? that could be intresting indeed)
Ya, and the Fonz was just making the fifties more interesting by jumping a shark while waterskiing.derelix said:It's sad when doing something fun and interesting is considered "jumping the shark"GoodApprentice said:If you're going to jump the shark with your franchise, you might as well go all out...
Your right, those silly devs should just stick to realistic games. That's obviously what people want, real life. Why did they have all that killing and action in RDR too? That's not the "real" west, violence was common but not as much as in the game. They should have the player doing nothing but regular jobs and occasionally having a quick gun battle with a couple of people.
Seriously, it's just a "what if" type thing. Marvel wasn't "jumping the shark" with marvel zombies, they were just making things interesting for a short side story.