Maevine said:
Wow, 12 pages now ._.;; I'm a little late...
This isn't exactly about transgender people, but I was wondering how you believed the rate of transsexuality would be affected if our culture were more gender-fluid and stopped enforcing the gender-binary. Do you think more or less people would become transsexual, or would the rate be substantially affected at all?
Secondly (and actually about transgender people this time), I've come across quite a few transgender and transsexual individuals who felt uncomfortable identifying with feminism because they didn't feel like they were being included by the community. So, how can one be a good trans* ally, and what can we cisgender people do to make our spaces more friendly and inclusive to transgender and transsexual people?
I'll totally understand if you don't have an answer for or just don't want to answer either one of these questions. Just in case, though, I thought I should ask .w. This thread is seriously an awesome idea~ I'm sorry about the trolls, though D:
Regarding the first question:
While i can often be heard babbling about how all the axis of sex are not binary, they are on continuums, it is more accurate to say that they mostly have bimodal distributions. Imagine a bell curve with two peaks and a valley. (insert snarky remark about the sexual imaginings of gamer culture
So, the axes (axises?):
P: Physical sex: Strongly bimodal, genetics usually works out and we are quite binary as a species, most are definitely concave or definitely convex.
G: Gender identity: As above, driven by genetics, but the two peaks are closer and shallower, and the failure rate is higher. That is, there seem to be more transgendered people than physically intersexed people.
B: Gender behavior: In modern western culture this is almost flat, non-modal, it has to be mapped as multivariant (think n-dimension scatter plots.) OTOH, in fundamentalist cultures, this is enforced to match physical sex.
D: Sexual desire: If the variant is "opposite sex" you get classic gaussian distribution. If the variants are "attracted to male" and "attracted to female" you get a lumpy bimodal. (I might be headed into the weeds, statisticians, help me out here
A: Gender as cultural artifact: some cultures, e.g. american natives, are trimodal, there's a little bump of third/inter sex in the middle. Most are quite bimodal.
All this leads up to the fact that the society you propose would only affect the shapes of B and A, (and possibly D, more bisexuals might come out of their internal closets.) I don't think it would have the slightest effect on P and G, so no change in the number of gender dysphoric
(I think I missed something important but this is too long already)
The Womyn born womyn argument still persists in old-school separatist feminism, but should fade within a generation or so. More at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Womyn's_Music_Festival#Women-born-women_policy