NightHawk21 said:
Oh don't worry you won't see it. About half the time you'll just get insta killed, and go wtf only to see the kill card pop up saying plasma rifle.
Haha, that sounds OP as fuck. Actually, this reminds me of a topic I've been meaning to post on the R/P board on the ethics of free-to-play gaming. Not sure if I'll ever get round to posting it as it's just ideas swimming around my head, but nonetheless I'll do a quick tester here...
Do you think it's potentially dangerous for a developer to change an item after its initial release when real money could have changed hands in its purchase? In other words, regardless of whether the item in question is unlockable through free means, some people will have paid for this weapon. If the weapon is deemed overpowered and henceforth nerfed, you might feel that your reason for purchase is invalidated, and that you should be entitled to a refund. Even if you've not gone and bought the overpowered weapon in question, if you've paid real money for a weapon that occupies a niche role that is made superfluous by the existence of such an OP weapon, you could feel equally as eligible for a refund.
There's another slightly different ethical problem which I'm facing personally. I'm not into FPS games generally, and I've only gotten into this game because it's free-to-play. Now that I've tried it, and I'm very happy to have had that chance, I can reflect and say that it is a
very good game. It's well made and introduced me to some new gameplay mechanics that I didn't know existed (but apparently Tribes fans knew about all along and kept to themselves; selfish bastards...). Is it immoral for me to not pay money for this game? I wouldn't have ever bought this game had it been a standard buy-to-play title. And yet I've played it enough to know that I like it. Should I be paying money? Or is it ok for people to take free-to-play to its letter and actually play it completely for free?