Twin Threesome Fantasy

Recommended Videos

WorldCritic

New member
Apr 13, 2009
3,021
0
0
The idea of two hot girls is always a nice thought, but incest is always a turn off for me, and the idea of a threesome doesn't seem like it would really work in practice. Of course I am only guessing, for all I know it could be awesome, I have no idea.
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
It would be interesting to know why... From my experience, hentai incests are overwhelmingly popular, I don't understand why. Not that I have any problem with incest, so long as the people involved aren't procreative et cetera, just why apparently it is such a turn on.

Cheshire the Cat said:
Twins are ultra hot because lesbian twin incest = wincent!

Had a threesome, honestly, it was kind of hard work... I can satisfy one partner just fine, but two... and if its all about you. If they are willing to play amongst themselves then its just fine but if not then its all on you and I don't multitask well!

If I ever got the opportunity again, but it turns out they were not interested in each other at all, just me, then I honestly would turn em down and go for 2 separate encounters.
You used Wincest, but you passed up on the opportunity to use Twincest? I am disappoint.
 

Vandy

New member
Apr 18, 2011
115
0
0
The girl/girl twin scenario always bugged me because it's kind of assumed that the girls will do things to each other while doing things to you. Porn doesn't lie. The very idea of the scenario implies that incest is a big turn on for the guy involved. Boo hiss on you sicko.
Now turn it around: Is incest implied if it was twin brothers double teaming a girl? A bridge in their Eiffel Tower if you will?
 

ckam

Make America Great For Who?
Oct 8, 2008
1,618
0
0
I'm not very sure if you explained it correctly but I do find Twin Threesome Fantasy as hot.
 

CJSinc

New member
May 1, 2011
48
0
0
Maybe its just me, (im often told i have no soul)
But i genuinely do not understand what is wrong with incest, so long as a child is not made, whats the problem? :/
 

TheIronRuler

New member
Mar 18, 2011
4,283
0
0
SgtFoley said:
I have actually never heard of this twin threesome fantasy and its kind of creepy.

TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
That depends entirely on how you define the word sex.
Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.

ravensheart18 said:
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
You know in the 1200s two nuns were found not guilty by a christian court of being lesbians and of breaking their vow of not to have sex. They got off because the priests were too ignorant to know that you can have sex without a penis.

Shocking that some people to this day don't understand that.
That's great, Do you have any other 'facts' I can't check nor have any knowledge of designed to make me look bad?
 

TheIronRuler

New member
Mar 18, 2011
4,283
0
0
James Joseph Emerald said:
TheIronRuler said:
Avatar Roku said:
TheIronRuler said:
AlAaraaf74 said:
I don't mind the idea of threesomes, but twins is a little much. Unless you're into really dirty sex, twins are actually kind of a turn off. Even if they're hot, if they touch each other like that, then they're preforming insest.
Girl on Girl ==> Technically no Sex ==> Technically NOT Incest.
Yay for logic.
.
On topic, it would be very strange to have it, I'd think I'm hallucinating.
Technically being the operative term.
You can replace it with the word "By definition". It's not Incest.
Does that mean that "by definition" a woman cannot rape another woman?
Rape has a legal definition and a literal definition.
Which is:
1. the unlawful compelling of a person through physical force or duress to have sexual intercourse.
2.
any act of sexual intercourse that is forced upon a person.
.
Sexual Intercourse is Coitus, but your phrasing of the law could also include other cases in which a woman would rape another woman or a worman would rape a man. Ours has both in the law, though the latter option hardly gets to court.
 

Owen Robertson

New member
Jul 26, 2011
545
0
0
New Frontiersman said:
RussetRanger said:
It's incest, ergo disgusting and wrong. Threesomes (or however many floats your boat) are fine so long as there is no family involved. It would also make the interactions awkward.
Not that I'm saying your wrong, but what makes all incest intrinsically "disgusting and wrong". As long as genetically mutated babies aren't produced from the act and no one is hurt or coerced into doing it, what makes incest intrinsically wrong?

Again I'm not saying you're wrong, I just want to see the logic or justification behind your statement.
=
Yeah, I'm not FOR incest by any means, but I don't give a fuck what anyone wants to do in their bedroom. So if some family members like getting it on, who are we to demonize their relationship?

Fucks: I don't give 'em!
 

Owen Robertson

New member
Jul 26, 2011
545
0
0
Blore said:
Honestly. I think I could have sex with two siblings. Guy siblings. As long as they didn't touch eachother though, or do anything incesty, the focus would have to be completely on them tag teaming me.
I've got brothers and I'd tag team a girl with either of them. It'd just be fuckin' the girl though, so give us a call Blore.
 

Cheesus333

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,523
0
0
Pretty disturbing as a concept for me, to be honest. I'm not speaking from a wealth of experience here, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understatement] but I'm pretty sure that if I ever got in a position where two related women (twin sisters, in this scenario) were willing to have sex with me at the same time, the only thing I'd be able to picture would be them growing up together. And unless you're this guy [http://www.blogcdn.com/www.urlesque.com/media/2009/11/pedobear.jpg], that's gonna be a bit of a turn off. And thus, a moment killer.

Hell, maybe I just can't enjoy the simple things like that. I'm not gonna frown upon anyone who can, but it ain't for me.
 

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,292
0
0
I don't really find the whole threesome idea apealling. Two girls two much effort, two guys, someone is probably far more involved than the other guy. Two twins or hell even sisters is weird.
 

Shadowkire

New member
Apr 4, 2009
242
0
0
necromanzer52 said:
viranimus said:
Hermes Conrad said:
"You are technically right, The best kind of right!"
Hermes never said that. It was his boss no. 1.0.

God, I feel nerdy right now.
And it wasn't right, it was correct!

[edit]
The Heavenator said:
You're both wrong, the quote is: "You're technically correct, the best kind of correct"
He beat me to it, well done sir.
 

Bane_Star

New member
Dec 4, 2008
98
0
0
Threesomes Smeesomes,

Heres my experience:
Either the girls aren't that interested in the idea, means your doing all the work = impossible to be 2 men at once.
The girls are competitive, which can be interesting to some, but for me was a turn off.. fighting over who gets the finish? WTF?
The girls are bi- and forget your even there, they get it on and push you away..
The girls are actually lesbians and .. well, your on your own.
The girls are paid to do it, sure, you get all the attention, but it COSTS!

Twins.. well, due to the above experience, I dated separately.. they both knew, and once did a swap.. mid coitus.. I didn't know til morning. But I felt betrayed..

Now a seven-some with six Filipino girls in a night club.. THATS an experience..
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
TheIronRuler said:
Well, sex=intercourse, and that requires penetration. None of that between women, unless you... um... you know.
The legal definition speaks of "acts of sexual intercourse", and if that would just mean penetration women could never be convicted of rape. It's pretty obvious that sexual acts encompass more than just penetration, among them acts that sisters can perform on each other, making them incestual sexual acts. Yay logic indeed.

And that's exactly the reason why the twin fantasy makes me go "Ew ew ew get it out of my face." 2 Girls who are close blood relations, grew up together and are doing all kinds of naughty things? Gross.
Blore said:
Honestly. I think I could have sex with two siblings. Guy siblings. As long as they didn't touch eachother though, or do anything incesty, the focus would have to be completely on them tag teaming me.
In that case they're not performing any sexual acts on each other, making it a whole 'nother ballgame. Hehehe...ballgame...