Really?SnootyEnglishman said:Wow i can understand the guy's reaction to a child not having his DNA. But taking it away and then threatening the lady with death because cheated on him due to him being an asshole? Well i guess and asshole's always an asshole.
Edit: Hang Him by the balls,, the BALLS i say
He kept the son which was biologically his, disowning the one that isn't. He won custody (like in any divorce proceeding), and is pretty angry. I would be too.
When did we start accepting it as a guy's fault when he's cheated on? Reverse the situation:
"How dare Elizabeth Edwards divorce her husband, and take the kids, and make him go through a political mess, all because he cheated on her because she was a *****/frigid/insert adjective"
Take any other male cheater, and try to phrase it as "his wife deserved it". You'd get yelled off the forum. Don't blame a man for making the same choice that many women here in America would make if cheated on.