Tyranny and STDs. Fable 3 - A revolution.

Recommended Videos

Shycte

New member
Mar 10, 2009
2,564
0
0
I first want to mention that this is my first review, so feedback is greatly appreciated.

So... Fable 3.

It has been intresting to see the Fable serie evolve. I remember loving the original game and the the serie has really moved away from the old days. But I i'm not sure we are moving in the right way here. But back to Fable 3.

You play the price/princess of Albion, your brother is a giant douche and needs to kicked of the throne ASAP. Therefor, you flee the castle and start looking for allies in your campaign against your brother who is named Logan by the way. Perhaps a tribute to Bioware's DA:O who had a evil tyrann named Loghain. But I digress. During this search you have to make promises that later you can choose to honor or forget that you ever spoke to them about abolishing child labor. I mean, why would you want to do such a thing?

The story is pretty fun overall. The writting is excellent and characters are better than ever. I do have a one issue with it, and that is the fact that there is no revolution. No angry mob or planing acts of terrorism. You get your allies, there is a quick battle and then you are the King. It misses out on such great potential here that it makes my sad.

Combat remains intact from Fable 2, with the largest change being magic. You now wear diffrent gloves based on what spell you want to cast. Later you learn to weave these spells togheter, but they still work is one spell. This for me made using Will extremly boring, the original games let you feel like this awesome wizard who could make the sky fall down upon ye. Now it's basicly a gun that happends to be your hand if you understand. Other than that the combat is preffy fun, atleast for a while.

Other than fighting you can run around, buy shops and houses. One issue is that you have to repair these houses. And when you own all the houses in Albion, that takes ages, even from the map. Get married and have kids. Sadly, Lionhead haven't fixed the fact that there is no reason to care about these villagers because the all look the same. I never felt any kind connection to the NPC that wasn't part of the story. If they die, there is a hundred just like em'.

One has to mention the Sanctury, instead of a pause menu one comes to this room where everything is avalible from manequins. Your clothes, make-up and weapons are their wating for you. It works really well and is very easily handeld.

One of the things I was really looking torwards to was the voice actors. A huge list of great names. When I heard that John Cleese was in it my pre-order was pretty much sealed. However, the only voice they ever really make good use of is Stephen Fry as Reaver. I was expecting some hilarious moments of true Monthy Python humor from John Cleese, on that point I was severly disappointed. If we ignore that fact, the voice acting is very good all in all.

To wrap it up Fable 3 is a good game, but not a great one. It could have been so much more with it's great humor and intresting plot but sadly, the unpolished and glitchy gameplay holds it back. It's fun, but only for a while.
 

Calax

New member
Jan 16, 2009
429
0
0
So... basically... it's as entirely anti-climactic as it's predecessor
 

SpaceSalmon

New member
Oct 26, 2010
12
0
0
I really enjoyed this game. The story made a lot more sense than the last fable and the Sanctuary is way better than having all those menus. I love John Cleese and Stephen Fry in it as well.
But I agree that the repairing houses is an annoying waste of time but necessary if I want to get money. and I haven't even bothered to get married or have kids in it as there is no point whatsoever.
I still get the feeling it's got so much potential, but it just never quite get there.
We'll just have to hope that Fable 4 is even better.
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,595
0
0
I really loved this, it felt massively improved with things like the sanctuary and combat.

The ending just felt rushed... I understand they were kind of going for that (no spoilers here) but it still seemed a little hurried, and gaining 500,000 gold just to be told you have to spend it all dicked me off no end -_-

But the game was executed pretty damn amazingly, and the voice acting was superb.
 

Mr.Something

New member
Apr 28, 2009
78
0
0
I returned it after a couple days because of the lack of customization and the fact that it is half a game
 

Shycte

New member
Mar 10, 2009
2,564
0
0
Mr.Something said:
I returned it after a couple days because of the lack of customization and the fact that it is half a game
I don't blame you. I am thinking of trading it in for a free pre-order of Dragon Age 2.
 

William MacKay

New member
Oct 26, 2010
573
0
0
i was really pissed off by the King/Queen section. 'raise 6.5 mil by being a shit so the ungrateful bastards hate you or be good and end up in a recession with almost no people who still hate you.' seriously annoying. they could have kept the decisions after that. my treasury is empty and i cant really do anything.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
William MacKay said:
i was really pissed off by the King/Queen section. 'raise 6.5 mil by being a shit so the ungrateful bastards hate you or be good and end up in a recession with almost no people who still hate you.' seriously annoying. they could have kept the decisions after that. my treasury is empty and i cant really do anything.
I believe the idea is to force people not to rush through.

Apparently one popular strategy is to buy out all the businesses you can since they don't need repairs, and then just leave the game running a couple nights when you sleep. Do it early on, and then just transfer like 10 million gold to the kingdom's coffers... problem solved.

Indeed this seems to have been intended since one of the "puzzles" is to build a mountain of gold in your treasury which you climb to get a key, and then to get rid of the gold so you can open the chest you see in there when the room is empty. It takes seveal million to get a big enough mountain to climb, and it seems a lot of people think like I do that you were intended to "solve" this puzzle when you emptied the room out endgame.

Now granted, a game that basically requires you to accrue money while sleeping to succeed at is doing something wrong... but there you go. :p
 

Timmibal

New member
Nov 8, 2010
253
0
0
Now granted, a game that basically requires you to accrue money while sleeping to succeed at is doing something wrong... but there you go.
This is half the problem. Ignoring the fact that QA was WOEFULLY absent from this release, there is something wrong with a primarily single-player RPG with an absence of anything resembling an organic playthrough. If this were Spore or a similar life/worldsim game, it could be expected for the player to minmax and metagame from the moment they hit start. But regardless of criticism to the contrary, Fable is marketed as an RPG, and it is reasonable to expect it to play like one.

All it would have taken is for Landlord and Entrepreneur to be implemented as sidequest rewards as opposed to Road to rule chests. Give the player something even RESEMBLING a hint that property management is all but required to succeed in the endgame. You're building a grassroots revolution, in what world does building a real estate portfolio at the same time seem relevant? It made some sense in fable 2, due to you starting from nothing and building influence in the world. But in this game? You're the fucking prince! Every piece of promotional material made it clear that you would be taking over the kingdom halfway through the damn game.

Also, the arbitrary jumps forward in time after every decision made bailing on the throne room in order to amass the obscene amount of cash needed (seriously, 6.5 million? With a starting treasury of only 400k?) just seem like cheating the game.

Customer, I am rush release.
Lionhead, I am disappoint.
 

Shru1kan

New member
Dec 10, 2009
813
0
0
Rather than comment on the game, I'll comment on the grammar and such. I'm seeing a lot of spelling errors, and run on sentences. Granted, nobody is perfect, but there were some glaring ones. Additionally, paragraphs shouldn't be so short, and your ideas need to blossom a bit more. The review felt as rushed as you say the game was. But beyond changing your entire review to make it more... meaty, I'd say get a spell check add on for your browser. It does wonders. Or get open Office for your word processor, it's a rival to Microsoft Word, and free to boot.

Hope that helps, and that, that is indeed the type of feedback you wanted as well.