The situations are, basically, the same. You're preying on someone's weakness/trust. And that's never right. Scamming actually IS a crime itself. Conmen get sent to prison same as rapists, and on some level, they both do the same thing. They take advantage of someone, and forever make them more wary of the world around them.Dimitriov said:Yes the seller was pretty obviously intending to scam someone, but it DID actually say in the description that it was just a photo. Do you see the difference here?
Yes, yes. But there is a difference. It's a difference of degree if nothing else, but that can be an important difference. Poking someone on the chin or punching them and dislocating their jaw is also a difference of degree, but it's a big difference.Azaraxzealot said:The situations are, basically, the same. You're preying on someone's weakness/trust. And that's never right. Scamming actually IS a crime itself. Conmen get sent to prison same as rapists, and on some level, they both do the same thing. They take advantage of someone, and forever make them more wary of the world around them.Dimitriov said:Yes the seller was pretty obviously intending to scam someone, but it DID actually say in the description that it was just a photo. Do you see the difference here?
Besides, you said it yourself. The intention WAS to scam someone. Being slightly more up front about your slimyness does not preclude the disgusting nature of it. The fact that SOMEwhere in the product description was a note saying that it was actually a photo doesn't mean anything. It could have been edited later, it could have been worded in a confusing manner that meant it could have been interpreted as not saying, specifically "This is actually a photo that you are paying for." Or it could have been tucked away in the recesses of the product description so as to "hide" it. I'm betting it was a combination of the 2nd and 3rd. The guy DID check the seller's rating, so it's not like he lacked common sense, and he probably thought that no one would actually be cruel enough to play that kind of scam, which he was wrong about. Fact of the matter is, this just SHOULDN'T HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE. No one should EVER be misleading as the scammer was. The asshole scammer is completely in the wrong here, just as a rapist or any other conman is completely in the wrong.
How can any sane person with any level of empathy even BEGIN to sit there and defend the criminal/perpetrator/scammer? The facts of the case are: A person made a listing on ebay that was clearly meant to mislead someone and con money out of them, it happened, the scammer got banned. Why in the hell is anyone defending the scammer?
http://consumerist.com/2007/05/15/ebay-scam-people-still-trying-to-sell-pictures-of-things/You are Bidding on a picture of a Apple iPod Video Black 30 gb that is BRAND New In BOX. As you can see in the picture it has never been opened. I Only Ship to the continental United States. I do not ship to PO Boxs. This is an as is sale There will be no returns. Payment is due within 3 days of sale ending. Thank you for looking at my sale and Happy Bidding!
Again, how do you know just how misleading the original listing was? Were you there? Did you see it? This guy said he checked the seller's profile to see if they checked out, and he said that they did (that in and of itself proves that he had some common sense/smarts). And ebay at LEAST requires that you put the correct condition, components, and the shipping information. We also know that it was listed in the correct category. Other than that, details are just being extrapolated. Details that just... aren't there. Like the guy is an idiot (the "evidence" provided is that he had a 4 year old and is 19. My grandfather was 19 and my dad was at least 8 at the time. My grandfather also owns his own construction company and took third place in a national martial arts contest while also going to college, so that's hardly good evidence). He deserved his money back. He was taken advantage of, and he deserves restitution.Dimitriov said:But that's the point: people should be expected to suffer the consequences of their own actions. So yes the scammer should be punished, but no I don't think this idiot should have gotten his money back.
Glad SOMEone has some empathy in this thread.Caiphus said:Clearly a con. I was expecting more empathy in a gaming community thread, but oh well. Good that he got his money back, as he should.
There's a good chance that the listing was deliberately misleading. These things happen fairly regularly, and it's not terribly difficult to see why someone might fall for:
http://consumerist.com/2007/05/15/ebay-scam-people-still-trying-to-sell-pictures-of-things/You are Bidding on a picture of a Apple iPod Video Black 30 gb that is BRAND New In BOX. As you can see in the picture it has never been opened. I Only Ship to the continental United States. I do not ship to PO Boxs. This is an as is sale There will be no returns. Payment is due within 3 days of sale ending. Thank you for looking at my sale and Happy Bidding!
Someone earlier explained that the whole price discrepancy thing was due to the same reason why games are so expensive in australia and PS4's are so expensive in Brazil.Robot Number V said:I don't know why people are using the whole "15 year old dad" angle to say he's an idiot. That strikes me as awfully judgmental and unfair. No, the thing that proves he's an idiot is that he KNEW the description stated that it was just a picture, and bought it anyway, somehow thinking it would be an Xbox.
Also, the fact that he was paying more then the console usually costs, and thought it was a "great deal".
He wasn't. He paid 450 pounds, which is exactly how much a Fifa 14 bundle is going for in the UK:Robot Number V said:Also, the fact that he was paying more then the console usually costs, and thought it was a "great deal".
How peculiar! It's not like you're speaking the same language. ;Perttheking said:I don't know about elsewhere but I know we do it here in the states too.JoJo said:The legal age of majority is 18 over here in the UK, but the term 'teenager' and it's derivatives can apply to anybody aged from 13 to 19. That may be different in other countries.Twenty Ninjas said:Wait, a 19-year-old is a "teen" now? ...what's the legal age of majority in the UK, again?
...and he's buying it for his four year old son? I...
...there are things about this news article. Things that are wrong, and in more than one way.
Actually I thought that too when I read that part, then I went to check and it turns out that the cheapest on Amazon is £429 which clocks in at about $700. Checking further the cheapest available is $950. It's a shame because I really wanted to call this guy stupid, but compared to the prices listed it's actually a good deal.SilverUchiha said:"I bought it there and then because I thought it was a good deal"
How? That's paying at least $200 more for what was already the most expensive next gen console. That doesn't make any sense to me at all.
I completely disagree with the cornholing this guy seems to be getting in this thread but that's probably the funniest thing I've read all week.mysecondlife said:Maybe he bought a condom from ebay and ended up with just a picture of oneStraightToHeck said:not surprising considering this guy's stupid enough to have a child at 15
I agree with everything you said. But if I can have a laugh at anyone's expense (especially since its on the internet), I'll do it. I'm skimming through the thread right now, and wow.. he's getting a lot of flak for having a kid. Of course.. he could be lying about it. Who knows?Altorin said:I completely disagree with the cornholing this guy seems to be getting in this thread but that's probably the funniest thing I've read all week.mysecondlife said:Maybe he bought a condom from ebay and ended up with just a picture of oneStraightToHeck said:not surprising considering this guy's stupid enough to have a child at 15
OT: The guy was scammed. We don't side with the scammers when people get scammed if we have a shred of decency. It's a jerk move to pull and even if "TECHNICALLY" the scammer put it out there that he was selling a picture, that doesn't make it an okay thing to do to trick someone, and he was clearly trying to trick them.
PayPal and eBay both side against scammers. They're not looking at this guy as some sort of villain that's playing the system and should have read the fine print. That's not the sort of situation we should strive to.
As for him having a kid at 15, that's unfortunate, but it happened. What's he supposed to do? Flush the kid down the toilet? I mean, maybe I just didn't get my time machine in the mail, but mistakes happen and considering he's a college student, I think he's on the right track and should be applauded for that much at least.
I'm sure I'll get tarred and feathered for siding with the guy but whatev.
oh, don't get me wrong, I wasn't really calling you out.. it seemed like a good natured poke and I thought it was greatmysecondlife said:I agree with everything you said. But if I can have a laugh at anyone's expense (especially since its on the internet), I'll do it. I'm skimming through the thread right now, and wow.. he's getting a lot of flak for having a kid. Of course.. he could be lying about it. Who knows?Altorin said:I completely disagree with the cornholing this guy seems to be getting in this thread but that's probably the funniest thing I've read all week.mysecondlife said:Maybe he bought a condom from ebay and ended up with just a picture of oneStraightToHeck said:not surprising considering this guy's stupid enough to have a child at 15
OT: The guy was scammed. We don't side with the scammers when people get scammed if we have a shred of decency. It's a jerk move to pull and even if "TECHNICALLY" the scammer put it out there that he was selling a picture, that doesn't make it an okay thing to do to trick someone, and he was clearly trying to trick them.
PayPal and eBay both side against scammers. They're not looking at this guy as some sort of villain that's playing the system and should have read the fine print. That's not the sort of situation we should strive to.
As for him having a kid at 15, that's unfortunate, but it happened. What's he supposed to do? Flush the kid down the toilet? I mean, maybe I just didn't get my time machine in the mail, but mistakes happen and considering he's a college student, I think he's on the right track and should be applauded for that much at least.
I'm sure I'll get tarred and feathered for siding with the guy but whatev.
Anyways, thanks for laughing with me.
People here have this weird obsession with rape. Its not even close to the same thing. You don't get a choice if you get raped. You get the opportunity to read about what you're buying before you buy it. You're not forced to buy it.Azaraxzealot said:I see a lot of people are just latching on to the fact that he had a kid at 15... or alternatively he got married to someone with a kid recently. In any case, so many people here are definitely embracing this point and simultaneously embracing their strong "blame the victim" mentality.
See if you can spot the similarities:
This story: "This guy has a kid at 15 years old and gets conned? Well of COURSE he did, he's stupid!"
Stories of Rape Victims: "This girl dressed like that in public and got raped? Well of COURSE she did, she's slutty!"
Conning and taking advantage of innocent people is never right, regardless of who the victim is or their lifestyle.
Everyone blaming the victim here is just being disgusting...