between red and green, green is the good guys.Leorex said:if its green then were the bad guysMasterSqueak said:It's green. Can't answer the second one though.Leorex said:is it red or green, are we the good guys or the bad?
between red and green, green is the good guys.Leorex said:if its green then were the bad guysMasterSqueak said:It's green. Can't answer the second one though.Leorex said:is it red or green, are we the good guys or the bad?
no, in starwars red is the good guys, and green is the bad guys.Altorin said:between red and green, green is the good guys.Leorex said:if its green then were the bad guysMasterSqueak said:It's green. Can't answer the second one though.Leorex said:is it red or green, are we the good guys or the bad?
exactly why the microwave exists.E.X.D. said:Anything made that can be used for the military will be regardless of its original purpose.
I know little when it comes to nukes or lasers, so please dont yell at me. :|thiosk said:Did anyone even read the article?
MasterSqueak said:America's new "Super Laser", designed to counter nuclear missilesWhat this has to do with countering nuclear missiles I do not know. You use it to test nuclear armaments to see if they will still perform as designed decades after their production.The Damn Article said:The National Ignition Facility's main purpose is to serve as a tool for gauging the reliability and safety of the US nuclear weapons arsenal but scientists say it could deliver breakthroughs in safe fusion power.
And the fusion thing is a brilliant plan where a bunch of physists got drunk and said "hey, what if we focused the output of several lasers at a single point?"
"Several? MORE LIKE 192!!!! THOUSAND!!!!"
we will see if this works, but this laser is not designed to shoot down nuclear weapons.
you are. taxes are fun.HaircareForMen said:Whos paying the electricity bill ?
don't you have some butter cookies you could be eating instead?Christemo said:it would be awesome... if the US didnt control it.
Or Ill- Tempered Sea BassLord_Panzer said:Now to mount one on the head of a shark.
I think they've been pushed back due to expenses and impracticality. Much like the Boeing airplane-mounted laserPandalisk said:Yes but i wasn't being dead serious in my statement, rather if such a thing can be created it can throw the whole "MAD" concept out the window, also just because America is developing the concept does not mean others are not.AceDiamond said:Yeah if not for the fact that the US is the one leading the "Railguns as a weapon" concept, although it's ridiculously expensive and thus not happening any time soon.Pandalisk said:So? this has been in development by Boeing for an age, they making a laser mounted on a plane than can cut a swathe through armoured columns,In quick rapid order and the thing is fucking invisible.
i dont see how good it is ethier if its an anti-nuclear missle shield if an enemy ship can just attack the coast with fucking railguns with slug ammunition going at speeds of mach 7, god were fucking ourselves arnt we?
Prototypes have been tried and tested, they plan to have them on battleships.. i think about 2012 or 11.
"Free" energy? Sign me up! Let's kerplode those hydrogen atoms already, science people.Terminalchaos said:Useless? Did you not read the line that says it has energy gain? This is a step towards fusion.pantsoffdanceoff said:A link would be cool, if I leave the escapist website too long (more than 2 seconds) I start detoxing.
EDIT: Oh wow I'm so glad money is going towards this rather useless technology instead of my education...