If I tried to mislead why would I keep your original comment?!?Sarge034 said:UCMJ (Uniformed Code of Military Justice) passed in 1950, done.MrFalconfly said:By standardizing military conduct and have very strict requirements for civilian interaction to make sure anything unprofessional doesn't happen.
It is always the responsibility of the military forces to make sure ANY interaction with the civilian populace (whether it be from their own country or in the country they're stationed) is resolved as peacefully as possible.
EDIT: If the local civilian populace "hates" the armed forces because "they're the man" (even though the armed forces are there to protect the civilian populace) then the armed forced have cocked up royally.
Your edit makes it painfully clear you have no idea about American culture. In the 60's there was a paradigm shift you need to learn about if you want to have any hope of understanding. Also, for the record, it is the civilian populous that gives the military a hard time the vast majority of the time.
Lastly, I never said "hate" so you should probably take that out of quotes.
"Hate" in inverted commas wasn't a quote. At most it was me paraphrasing it.
And yes I don't know how the US military functions internally. All I can operate from are people who've been in the system and news from the areas they've operated in.
As for the UCMJ. There's a hell of a difference between how the legislation says the US can conduct war and how the Soldiers are trained to act in war.