Hehe, nice to see someone from Argentina here. I agree with you mate, 180 pesos for an almost one year old game is just ridiculous.teh_Canape said:uh, it's a rather common problem down here in my countryStarke said:Okay, I've found the post I was remembering. Here. [http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showpost.php?p=18801958&postcount=32] I can follow this up on the original posts on Ubisoft's forums, if you'd like.
How'd you rack up that much for Mirror's Edge? I spent $10 bucks for it. Then again, I spent over $400 on STO... so I guess it's all relative.
EDIT: I've only seen a few bugs in New Vegas that weren't there in Fallout 3, and with one exception they were almost universally hilarious.
see, technology is expensive as fuck, especially with our fucked up exchange rate (that would be, US$1 = AR$4)
so I got it retail
On-Topic: I'm sorry guys, but when I'm with Ubisoft when it comes to the implementation of this DRM. I mean, I wouldn't support it if I had constant disconnections when playing the game, but I bought Assassin's Creed II the week it was released, and the only time I was unable to play it was a long time ago. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/98927-Ubisoft-DRM-Authentication-Servers-Go-Down]
However, I do understand why so many people hate this DRM. Just remember, DRM is the industry's reaction to piracy. Wether or not the reaction affects the action, it's a completely different subject. Maybe this DRM will be successful some years from now, when Internet connections become more realiable. Right now, I don't think most people can embrace the idea of an always-online requirement (well, some can [http://www.tweakguides.com/AC2_1.html]).