I'm sorry but I'm going to have to call your BS out on this one. Where in the blue hell do you see police wailing on the guy with a baton on the ground?!jedizero said:And people in Europe complain about how America is totally the worst country in 'teh world!11!!'
In America, if someone did this, they'd end up crucified before the American public.
Instead the news are trying to goddamned GLORIFY THE COP.
I'm sorry, I don't give a shit what the kid did, He's in a wheel chair, he's unable to do much more. You can even see him being wailed on with a baton while he's on the ground, struggling to do *anything*.
And you people are sitting here going 'oh well he TOTALLY DESERVED IT MAN.'
And apparently America is the one perpetuating horrible crimes against humanity.
Hosker said:It's not that I'm naive; it's just that I can't fathom why anybody would do this if they did not have a very good reason to.Wicky_42 said:So... much... naivity - can't understand this blind faith in the status quo. "All police are nice guys who only use violence against violence" - wake up, Jesus -.-UHosker said:It is extremely hard to see what is happening in that video. I'm sure they officers wouldn't have just done it randomly; there has to have been a reason.
There you go, that's why I called you naive. You didn't question, even when you've just seen a person unable to even wheel his own chair get thrown down to and dragged across the street by a pair of cops. You just assumed [insert generic authority figure] was right merely because he was [generic authority feature], and that's something I can't abide :/I'm sure they[sic] officers wouldn't have just done it randomly; there has to have been a reason.
while i usually dont blame police officers when something goes wrong, but i was there in parliament square, the police were usuing questionable tactics and kettling us before any violence or any kind of protest actually startedspartan231490 said:Prove it. It's a one minute video, you have no proof as to what happened that caused the cop to act this way. For all we know, the cripple deserved it. He is a cop, if you can't trust him not to abuse cripples, how can you trust him to uphold justice and the law? Interesting philisophical question right there. Why do we allways assume the cop is at fault when one of these show's up, and not the other way around? My bet is on projection. We identify more with the non-cop, therefore we project ourselves onto the non-cop and think "I wouldn't have done anything wrong so it must be the cop's fault" sub-consciously at least. That's my two cents, not that I have any reasonable credentials for that to be taken as fact, but it IS my opinion.
AaaahahahahaShadowPuppet said:They should just announce that the tuition fee rise is final, and nothing can be done about it now. that would stop all these protests at least.
So dragging him out of his chair wouldn't incites riots? There were two other people trying to get the police officers off of the guy. There have been so many riots started specifically because of police brutality no matter what the accused had done. Rodney King anyone? Excessive force is excessive force. The 2005 riots in France pushed simple protests into riots.NeedAUserName said:He could have been trying to incite a riot/violence or anything like that.LightspeedJack said:But what could he have possibly done, you can see he is just sitting there, what possible threat could this handicapped person have done to warrant being dragged across the road.spartan231490 said:snip
It's a fee everyone who (technically) watches TV has to pay, though in practice merely owning a TV set is enough to warrant the charge (and they even tried to make me pay for having a PC - threw that back in t heir faces, lol).Choppaduel said:Can you opt out of paying? if not then its tax and thus the fucking government.ReddiShadow said:Actually no, the BBC is funded by a 'license fee' that everyone pays along with their other taxes.
You people trust your governments way too much.
/threadVidiot said:Even if the man had been inciting the crowd, the police could have just pushed the wheelchair across the road. Dragging him from his chair was not necessary, and showed that the police at the scene were exercising very poor judgment. I know police hate student demonstrations because it's so easy for things to get out of hand in the chaos, but this is excessive force.
Off topic, I really wanted to hit that news anchor for the way he was trying to spin the situation.
I can't see how dragging a guy across the street is an effective bomb defusing tactic. Neither is shooting the bomber, that's just asking to get blown up.spartan231490 said:You do realize he still has the ability to talk and push buttons right. This could allow him to incite a riot through his words, not all that hard, or possibly to activate a bomb. I doubt he had a bomb or the probably would have just shot himGindil said:Please... Look up Cerebral Palsy. HOW can he do anything from a wheelchair and loss of motor skills?
Well for one, in the interview it shows that fact that he has trouble speaking. That alone shows that his words wouldn't be effective in enticing a riot. I don't think you understand the severity of Cerebral Palsy. He has the more advanced version due to his inability to walk. My cousin is only just a bit worse than he is, and my cousin can barely form words. If anything he's lucky to be able to speak. I agree that tyrannical governments suppress people but this is the UK we're talking about so that argument is invalid. Simple and plain. I'm not saying the guy is completely innocent but neither are the police. It's like the Rodney King incident. King was high on heroin and was pulled over for speeding. he attacks the cops. The cops restrain him. The cops then beat King while he was handcuffed. The cops are on trial for police brutality. The cops are acquitted even with video evidence. And the L.A. Riots happen. Those cops are lucky that the protesting students didn't jump them.Just cuz he has cerebral palsy, doesn't mean he cant be a threat. I mean, there's a reason tyrannical governments control what their citizens are allowed to say. words can often be the most powerful weapons of all.
Because they can't, the proposal still has to through the House of Lords. If the Lords don't like it the whole process starts again.ShadowPuppet said:They should just announce that the tuition fee rise is final, and nothing can be done about it now. that would stop all these protests at least.
look at the video...it looks like they were trying to get him out of a crowd with his wheelchair and he fell out...that sounds like no time to get him back in...a minor condition of CP where only his leggs are out of wack and well...you have an angry college student with a rock in his hand...im not on anyones side i dont know the story but they were trying with the wheelchair it looks like....and i really doubt someone is just that sick.......Ois said:Surely it would've been easier to move him on his wheelchairspartan231490 said:Prove it. It's a one minute video, you have no proof as to what happened that caused the cop to act this way. For all we know, the cripple deserved it. He is a cop, if you can't trust him not to abuse cripples, how can you trust him to uphold justice and the law? Interesting philisophical question right there. Why do we allways assume the cop is at fault when one of these show's up, and not the other way around? My bet is on projection. We identify more with the non-cop, therefore we project ourselves onto the non-cop and think "I wouldn't have done anything wrong so it must be the cop's fault" sub-consciously at least. That's my two cents, not that I have any reasonable credentials for that to be taken as fact, but it IS my opinion.