Update: TVTropes Deletes All Rape Tropes

Recommended Videos

SidNightwalker

New member
Jun 26, 2012
1
0
0
On the contrary, I'd say the corporation forcing itself upon free speech for no good reason looks pretty bad here.But who am I kidding, the rights of individual human beings were bought out a long time ago.
 

BrotherRool

New member
Oct 31, 2008
3,834
0
0
I'm not disappointed in TVTropes. Your sites survival or a lot of work and hassle about a controversial subject?

Donations wouldn't have worked, Google was giving the site marks. Fair enough, clean it up.

Sad about Google though, I would have thought TV Tropes is big enough to get some beyond bot treatment on the issue

Eternal_Lament said:
Before I begin, I just want to say I'm a little fascinated with the talk of rape as of late (mainly on this site). Not against that, although I'm curious what it's been about these past 2 weeks that's sort of sent everything into motion.

Anyways, this is just stupid on so many levels. I'm not sure what bothers me more, the implication that reading or talking about rape will send people out to rape, or that the reaction to such a suggestion is to just get rid of all topics concerning rape. In the end I guess TvTropes has to do what it has to in order to survive, but why the hell is such a policy there in the first place? Further if the logic is "Reading something causes you to act on it" then why is it only limited to one word? By this logic shouldn't TvTropes get rid of all articles discussing murder or torture because "It may promote these topics"? I really hope this changes back.
This wasn't a moral decision from Google. All it was is that Google rates sites according to their suitability for people, and it seems fair enough that sites which discuss rape would be labelled as unsuitable for 5 yr olds or whatever. So their's less demograhic => less money fro adverts.

Remember Google weren't asking the content to be censored, just stating that the content meant the site ranked as explicit and so received less advertising money. 'Reading something causes you to act on it' wasn't involved.

All the same, although I could see companies not wanting their advertisements to appear on articles discussing rape (not necessarily the cleanest of connotations) and I can see why discussion of rape would be labelled as adult-appropriate content, I feel that Google should have made exceptions in their policy and treated this with more weight and wisdom
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
I'll keep saying this, it's the Tropers own fucking fault that they couldn't handle the subject material in a mature manner. See CrazyGogg's videos for more examples of why the users are pretty much scum. It they could write articles without sperging over more squicky and uncomfortable subject material like it was their own personal fetish diary.

Fuck them. Eddie is a moron and a terrible coder, his moderators are just as bad as his pervert users. Burn the place to the ground.
 

Sixcess

New member
Feb 27, 2010
2,719
0
0
Eternal_Lament said:
Before I begin, I just want to say I'm a little fascinated with the talk of rape as of late (mainly on this site). Not against that, although I'm curious what it's been about these past 2 weeks that's sort of sent everything into motion.
It's all spiralled out of the perfect storm of the Hitman trailer, the Tomb Raider E3 trailer and the Tropes vs Women Kickstarter. I think it's some sort of mass psychosis that sweeps the internet every so often.

Personally, although I posted frequently on the Tomb Raider discussions for a while, and there has been some good reading come out of it, I'm hoping this storm blows over sooner rather than later. It's all getting a bit much.

OT: Interesting to see good old capitalist greed 'cleaning up' the internet once more. I seem to recall Encyclopedia Dramatica had to cull its content a while back for much the same reason. Whilst Tropers will no doubt cringe at the comparison I'm not sure much of value is being lost.

That said, it's still an overly simplistic approach. Taking a broader view than merely TvTropes, a problem doesn't go away just because you don't talk about it.
 

Eternal_Lament

New member
Sep 23, 2010
559
0
0
him over there said:
I don't think people totally understand what is going on here. Yes the deletion was because of google, however google isn't cutting ads because of rape. They're making them cut rape tropes because the tvtropes community is infested with rape apologists and fetishists, creating a disgusting image problem.
That's like burning your entire lawn because you found a few weeds. Further, the community is still there. It doesn't just disappear because the articles that have rape in their title are gone. All this does is ruin things for everyone, because a) several people NOT part of the community that was being targeted are still losing out and are essentially being punished for things they didn't do, and b) now that these articles have been taken down any arguments from the targeted community that say people take rape too seriously are now validated in some way, in turn validating the very community that was being condemned.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
I'll keep saying this, it's the Tropers own fucking fault that they couldn't handle the subject material in a mature manner. See CrazyGogg's videos for more examples of why the users are pretty much scum. It they could write articles without sperging over more squicky and uncomfortable subject material like it was their own personal fetish diary.

Fuck them. Eddie is a moron and a terrible coder, his moderators are just as bad as his pervert users. Burn the place to the ground.
This. The decision to take out the stuff like troper tales/fetish fuel/rape tropes*/etc. is just dealing with symptoms.

[small]*although IMO there is a legitimate criticism raised against this last one being removed by Geek Feminism et al.[/small]
 

Baron von Blitztank

New member
May 7, 2010
2,133
0
0
What is with all this rape talk nowadays? Did I miss something important?
Don't get me wrong, rape is an absolutely terrible crime but so is Pedophilia and I still laugh at the odd Pedobear meme or three. Has it really come to the stage right now where the mere mention of the word rape brings down the wrath of Asura?
 

Eternal_Lament

New member
Sep 23, 2010
559
0
0
BrotherRool said:
This wasn't a moral decision from Google. All it was is that Google rates sites according to their suitability for people, and it seems fair enough that sites which discuss rape would be labelled as unsuitable for 5 yr olds or whatever. So their's less demograhic => less money fro adverts.

Remember Google weren't asking the content to be censored, just stating that the content meant the site ranked as explicit and so received less advertising money. 'Reading something causes you to act on it' wasn't involved.

All the same, although I could see companies not wanting their advertisements to appear on articles discussing rape (not necessarily the cleanest of connotations) and I can see why discussion of rape would be labelled as adult-appropriate content, I feel that Google should have made exceptions in their policy and treated this with more weight and wisdom
The question I'd have next though is why are only articles with rape in the title taken down? Drugs, torture, and murder and are probably just as unsuitable for a 5 year old as rape is, yet all that stuff is still there. It just seems so reactionary, it's hard to see this as a business decision based on negotiation and forecasting and more on just trying to get it over with as soon as possible.

Sixcess said:
It's all spiralled out of the perfect storm of the Hitman trailer, the Tomb Raider E3 trailer and the Tropes vs Women Kickstarter. I think it's some sort of mass psychosis that sweeps the internet every so often.

Personally, although I posted frequently on the Tomb Raider discussions for a while, and there has been some good reading come out of it, I'm hoping this storm blows over sooner rather than later. It's all getting a bit much.
In some ways I both want it to move on but to also just stay put. On the one hand I think we have enough material for now that we can just create a long form discussion, and that all this other stuff is sort of just flooding things a bit much. On the other hand, I'm almost worried about next month's topic is going to be that it ends up eclipsing this one.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
I'm getting a distinct mental image here.

It's of a man trying to kill a house fly with a grenade launcher.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
This is just a taste of the cyclical arguments that have culminated in the purging of Rape Tropes.


As much as I hate Fast Eddie for being so incompetent, I have to love when he takes things into his own hands and shits on the creeps he un-ironically considers his users. I haven't checked Content Violations for a while, but I can just imagine how many crying pedos and closet rapists are screaming THOUGHTCRIME! and ORWELLIAN! at the loss of their precious wank indexes.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
Baron von Blitztank said:
What is with all this rape talk nowadays? Did I miss something important?
Don't get me wrong, rape is an absolutely terrible crime but so is Pedophilia and I still laugh at the odd Pedobear meme or three. Has it really come to the stage right now where the mere mention of the word rape brings down the wrath of Asura?
This is a separate event - basically advertisers were not comfortable with the situation, and TVTropes pulled the pages to maintain funding. They almost definitely wouldn't have done this otherwise, because the TVTropes community is basically GSF1 [http://www.plausiblydeniable.com/opinion/gsf.html] taken to horrifying extremes.
 

PrinceOfShapeir

New member
Mar 27, 2011
1,849
0
0
Oh, for the love of God, people. The tropes haven't been deleted, they're just in the process of talking it over with Google and/or modifying the pages to fit guidelines. They'll be back in a few days. Chill out.
 

BrotherRool

New member
Oct 31, 2008
3,834
0
0
Eternal_Lament said:
The question I'd have next though is why are only articles with rape in the title taken down? Drugs, torture, and murder and are probably just as unsuitable for a 5 year old as rape is, yet all that stuff is still there. It just seems so reactionary, it's hard to see this as a business decision based on negotiation and forecasting and more on just trying to get it over with as soon as possible.
It's not so much the murder and things like that I have a problem with but I'm confused why the other sexually related stuff hasn't caused an 'explicit' rating. I don't think murder etc is normally rated as explicit and in any case both through the reality of the action and cultural consciousness death is much more acceptable than rape. Perhaps torture should be an issue too, but that's got a military twinge, you get stuff like 24 which glorifies torture in a way that doesn't happen with rape.

Hmmm, actually considering that, rape is probably _the_ most explicit content you could have. It's completely objectionable in every form, it's both violent and sexual and has a harsher affect than almost everything else in both those categories.
 

The Random One

New member
May 29, 2008
3,310
0
0
I dun buy it. Fast Eddie has been an awful host for quite some time. Why there hasn't been an exodus of tropers to set up a sensibly run site is beyond me.
 

wooty

Vi Britannia
Aug 1, 2009
4,252
0
0
Rape certainly has become the new net hot topic hasn't it.

Though putting certain subjects at center stage sometimes has bad repercussions. Be a long while until this subject blows over.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
rhizhim said:
this is sad. the tropes show how this delicate subject can be implemented in a story.
this is somewhat contra productive....
Please, no. Imagine this [http://www.scribd.com/doc/79226017/Anime-is-the-Tie-that-Binds-Us] but with grimdarkrapegrimdark instead of anime.