On the contrary, I'd say the corporation forcing itself upon free speech for no good reason looks pretty bad here.But who am I kidding, the rights of individual human beings were bought out a long time ago.
This wasn't a moral decision from Google. All it was is that Google rates sites according to their suitability for people, and it seems fair enough that sites which discuss rape would be labelled as unsuitable for 5 yr olds or whatever. So their's less demograhic => less money fro adverts.Eternal_Lament said:Before I begin, I just want to say I'm a little fascinated with the talk of rape as of late (mainly on this site). Not against that, although I'm curious what it's been about these past 2 weeks that's sort of sent everything into motion.
Anyways, this is just stupid on so many levels. I'm not sure what bothers me more, the implication that reading or talking about rape will send people out to rape, or that the reaction to such a suggestion is to just get rid of all topics concerning rape. In the end I guess TvTropes has to do what it has to in order to survive, but why the hell is such a policy there in the first place? Further if the logic is "Reading something causes you to act on it" then why is it only limited to one word? By this logic shouldn't TvTropes get rid of all articles discussing murder or torture because "It may promote these topics"? I really hope this changes back.
It's all spiralled out of the perfect storm of the Hitman trailer, the Tomb Raider E3 trailer and the Tropes vs Women Kickstarter. I think it's some sort of mass psychosis that sweeps the internet every so often.Eternal_Lament said:Before I begin, I just want to say I'm a little fascinated with the talk of rape as of late (mainly on this site). Not against that, although I'm curious what it's been about these past 2 weeks that's sort of sent everything into motion.
That's like burning your entire lawn because you found a few weeds. Further, the community is still there. It doesn't just disappear because the articles that have rape in their title are gone. All this does is ruin things for everyone, because a) several people NOT part of the community that was being targeted are still losing out and are essentially being punished for things they didn't do, and b) now that these articles have been taken down any arguments from the targeted community that say people take rape too seriously are now validated in some way, in turn validating the very community that was being condemned.him over there said:I don't think people totally understand what is going on here. Yes the deletion was because of google, however google isn't cutting ads because of rape. They're making them cut rape tropes because the tvtropes community is infested with rape apologists and fetishists, creating a disgusting image problem.
This. The decision to take out the stuff like troper tales/fetish fuel/rape tropes*/etc. is just dealing with symptoms.Soviet Heavy said:I'll keep saying this, it's the Tropers own fucking fault that they couldn't handle the subject material in a mature manner. See CrazyGogg's videos for more examples of why the users are pretty much scum. It they could write articles without sperging over more squicky and uncomfortable subject material like it was their own personal fetish diary.
Fuck them. Eddie is a moron and a terrible coder, his moderators are just as bad as his pervert users. Burn the place to the ground.
The question I'd have next though is why are only articles with rape in the title taken down? Drugs, torture, and murder and are probably just as unsuitable for a 5 year old as rape is, yet all that stuff is still there. It just seems so reactionary, it's hard to see this as a business decision based on negotiation and forecasting and more on just trying to get it over with as soon as possible.BrotherRool said:This wasn't a moral decision from Google. All it was is that Google rates sites according to their suitability for people, and it seems fair enough that sites which discuss rape would be labelled as unsuitable for 5 yr olds or whatever. So their's less demograhic => less money fro adverts.
Remember Google weren't asking the content to be censored, just stating that the content meant the site ranked as explicit and so received less advertising money. 'Reading something causes you to act on it' wasn't involved.
All the same, although I could see companies not wanting their advertisements to appear on articles discussing rape (not necessarily the cleanest of connotations) and I can see why discussion of rape would be labelled as adult-appropriate content, I feel that Google should have made exceptions in their policy and treated this with more weight and wisdom
In some ways I both want it to move on but to also just stay put. On the one hand I think we have enough material for now that we can just create a long form discussion, and that all this other stuff is sort of just flooding things a bit much. On the other hand, I'm almost worried about next month's topic is going to be that it ends up eclipsing this one.Sixcess said:It's all spiralled out of the perfect storm of the Hitman trailer, the Tomb Raider E3 trailer and the Tropes vs Women Kickstarter. I think it's some sort of mass psychosis that sweeps the internet every so often.
Personally, although I posted frequently on the Tomb Raider discussions for a while, and there has been some good reading come out of it, I'm hoping this storm blows over sooner rather than later. It's all getting a bit much.
This is a separate event - basically advertisers were not comfortable with the situation, and TVTropes pulled the pages to maintain funding. They almost definitely wouldn't have done this otherwise, because the TVTropes community is basically GSF1 [http://www.plausiblydeniable.com/opinion/gsf.html] taken to horrifying extremes.Baron von Blitztank said:What is with all this rape talk nowadays? Did I miss something important?
Don't get me wrong, rape is an absolutely terrible crime but so is Pedophilia and I still laugh at the odd Pedobear meme or three. Has it really come to the stage right now where the mere mention of the word rape brings down the wrath of Asura?
It's not so much the murder and things like that I have a problem with but I'm confused why the other sexually related stuff hasn't caused an 'explicit' rating. I don't think murder etc is normally rated as explicit and in any case both through the reality of the action and cultural consciousness death is much more acceptable than rape. Perhaps torture should be an issue too, but that's got a military twinge, you get stuff like 24 which glorifies torture in a way that doesn't happen with rape.Eternal_Lament said:The question I'd have next though is why are only articles with rape in the title taken down? Drugs, torture, and murder and are probably just as unsuitable for a 5 year old as rape is, yet all that stuff is still there. It just seems so reactionary, it's hard to see this as a business decision based on negotiation and forecasting and more on just trying to get it over with as soon as possible.
Please, no. Imagine this [http://www.scribd.com/doc/79226017/Anime-is-the-Tie-that-Binds-Us] but with grimdarkrapegrimdark instead of anime.rhizhim said:this is sad. the tropes show how this delicate subject can be implemented in a story.
this is somewhat contra productive....