US Wins Court Battle to Extradite Kim Dotcom

Recommended Videos

Shrack

New member
Feb 25, 2013
21
0
0
WaitWHAT said:
No, no, no. The point is that this group was extradited on the most spurious, ridiculous evidence, ever. Natwest (the company they had allegedly embezzled) didn't press charges against them. It was done purely so that the U.S. department of prosecution could add a few more to their kill list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NatWest_Three#Witnesses_controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NatWest_Three#Fair_trial_argument
If the evidence is so weak then the New Zeland High Court has (not had) the right to refuse the extradition. Really, NatWest? Did you read all of it? These guys where in bed with ENRON. And the charge they copped to was Wire Fraud, not embezzelment. And wire fraud charges don't require an aggrived party to file charges. The Federal govt can do so on it's own.