Mozared said:
steeltrain said:
I believe in California that it's illegal to talk on a cell phone while driving, but you can still text. Not sure how that works out.
That would be pretty stupid, seeing as you actually have to *look* at the phone for texting as well.
Actually, I know people that don't for the actual input of text section. One does have to read what they're replying to, but beyond that, I've watched my sisters input text and not even look at it, and it comes out perfectly fine. Not saying it's s-m-r-t while driving, just possible.
Also, while hands-free does solve many of the problems that comes with doing something else with the hands while driving, it doesn't solve the distraction part. Even
talking to someone else while I'm driving
while they're in the car with me can cause me to miss turns or many, many years ago, run a stop sign.
It's not all about what the hands are doing, it's about what the brain is doing, and that includes the hands. Very simply, it can be extremely difficult to talk and do something else that isn't directly related to what's being talked about. We have a phrase called "auto-pilot" we use when driving, and that's "I went there/did that without consciously thinking about it." This can get me into trouble. I'll auto-pilot towards work when I wanted to go the other way, or towards home when wanting to go to a friend's house. This occurs when the brain is not actively involved in the driving process; it's just letting the feet, eyes, and hands do what they normally do, whether it's correct or incorrect.
Auto-piloting because you're talking to someone else can occur whether your hands are busy or not. Because you're not 100% "there" behind the wheel, it's an increaed potential for accidents. But making a concession towards taking the hands and eyes away from the driving process is a step forward in the correct direction, whether it completely solves the problem or not.
Phones today are more than just audio communication devices. When it's your MP3 player, which is legal to have in your car at that size, then looking at it to switch playlists presents the same danger as looking down at the screen to see who's calling/texting. Using GPS includes the same dangers - you have to take your eyes away from the road in order to read it, whether it's talking to you or not. You also have to take your eyes away from the road in some cases just to use the radio. We still have radios in cars, though, even though they represent a safety risk. Why are they there then? Because as much as possible has been done to them to reduce the risk presented by having the device in the car. It's still a risk, but it's acceptable because of all the steps taken to minimize as much of the potential risk as possible, and it has become small enough to fit within a margin of acceptability.
Just because it doesn't make sense right now doesn't mean it's not a good idea. We begin with small steps - start narrowing down the risk. People aren't just going to stop using their phones - we've let it go too far for too long. But we can scale back on what's acceptable. And eventually we narrow the risk down in order to fit it within that margin of acceptability. That's what this is about - margin of acceptability.