V for Vendetta, gay rights film?

Recommended Videos

JMeganSnow

New member
Aug 27, 2008
1,591
0
0
I enjoyed V for Vendetta a great deal, but I wasn't familiar with the graphic novel going in. I saw the persecution of gays/muslims/etc. more as the fact that totalitarians always go after some "objectionable" group or groups as the first step to consolidating their power. It's the reason why it's necessary to defend the rights of people you don't like--because the jackbooted thugs will be coming for *you* next if you don't.

There's a good poem [http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/articles6/hangman_by_maurice_o.htm] on the subject by Maurice Ogden.
 

Xhumed

New member
Jun 15, 2008
1,526
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil post=18.71035.711611 said:
Xhumed post=18.71035.711567 said:
The story about the lesbian woman is from the graphic novel, Stephen Fry's character has been added by the filmakers. Since Stephen Fry is gay in real life, I suppose it made sense to make his character gay as well.
They've also removed Finch's speech about how he loved the Black people and the Gay men.

They've also removed Helen Heyer, the scheming woman who manipulates a lot of the events.

But lets leave it to Alan Moore (the creator)

Alan Moore said:
[The movie] has been "turned into a Bush-era parable by people too timid to set a political satire in their own country? It's a thwarted and frustrated and largely impotent American liberal fantasy of someone with American liberal values standing up against a state run by neoconservatives?which is not what the comic V for Vendetta was about. It was about fascism, it was about anarchy, it was about England."[10]

Switching to Wiki

He later adds that if the Wachowskis had wanted to protest what was going on in the United States, then they should have used a political narrative that spoke directly at the USA's issues, similar to what Moore had done before with Britain. The film changes the original message by arguably having changed "V" into a freedom fighter instead of an anarchist. An interview with producer Joel Silver suggests that the change may not have been conscious; he identifies the V of the comics as a clear-cut "superhero? a masked avenger who pretty much saves the world," a simplification that goes against Moore's own statements about V's role in the story.
Also the fact that Moore's stories are about Sexuality in general, and mostly Super-Heterosexuality. (See The Watchmen, King Hell, Swamp Thing)
I know, I know. I'm hoping Watchmen is the first Alan Moore film they get right. I'm not holding my breath, but I'm hoping.
Maestro Moore will probably still hate it though.
 

poleboy

New member
May 19, 2008
1,026
0
0
Xhumed post=18.71035.714336 said:
I know, I know. I'm hoping Watchmen is the first Alan Moore film they get right. I'm not holding my breath, but I'm hoping.
Maestro Moore will probably still hate it though.
Could go either way with that director... anyone know what Frank Miller thought about 300? As long as they don't pretty it up too much like they did with the League movie, I think it will be watchable (hur, hur) at least. I still think they should've had Rodriquez do it. He's the only director so far who has proven that he's actually capable of bringing a graphic novel to life.
 

Copter400

New member
Sep 14, 2007
1,813
0
0
The whole gay thing was to demonstrate how the new government was destroying freedom.

Also, V's a dude.